Crossover and Crossunder

Scott Abraham wrote:
"yunlong" wrote in message
Glad to hear it; a foul mouth, reflects a dirty mind, doesn't not
make you a better skier but a pathetic human being.


Couldn't agree with you more. A truly dirty mind, a psychopathic
mind, a pathetic human being.

I thought Yunlong was your friend! That's not very nice.

ant

Ted Waldron wrote:
In article .com,
"yunlong" wrote:

Bob Lee wrote:
yunlong wrote:
Bob Lee wrote:
yunlong wrote:
Bob Lee wrote:
[...]
[...]
"What I'm running here (a temple) is a general store, if you
come looking for gold, I'll give you the gold; if you come
looking for mouse ****, I'll give you the mouse ****."
-Yang Shan Hui Ji, a Chan master-

From a Monty Python Sketch

Whistler: Your Highness, you are also like a stream of bat's ****.
Prince of Wales: What?
Whistler: It was one of Wilde's. One of Wilde's.
Oscar Wilde: It sodding was not! It was Shaw!
George Bernard Shaw: I ... I merely meant, Your Majesty, that
you shine out like a shaft of gold when all around is dark.

It sounded like a mundane small talk.

To see how low you wanna go.

I'm not going down with you, if that's what you're waiting to
see.

Glad to hear it; a foul mouth, reflects a dirty mind,
doesn't not make you a better skier but a pathetic human
being.

Given that this is Usenet, home of foul mouths and pathetic
human beings, I am wondering why you are posting here,

Panning gold among some useless pebbles?

when you could be hanging out with much more higher forms of
humans on the Nevada Side of South Lake Tahoe, or in that
temple of higher learning, Carson City.

You mean those flashing [neon] lights, endless noise making [slot]
machines, and mindless small talks of money/casino cultured so-called
"high society"? Spare me. I'm confused what you mean by "higher forms
of humans."


IS


-ted

bdubya wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant"
wrote:


Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and they are
way too big. You mark my words.


If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

Well, since Airbus fixed their early airplane fly-by-wire software
problems (at least the obvious ones) their early designs don't crash
nearly as often.

So: Who wants to be the test subjects for this latest incarnation of an
Airbus massive fly-by-wire software project? I say give them a few years
to fix the easy bugs using the French as test subjects, then the rest of
us can take the risk.

"bdubya" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant"
wrote:


Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and they are
way too big. You mark my words.

If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

Isn't that Quantas claim to fame?
("Rainman")

"Scott Abraham" wrote in message
...

"yunlong" wrote in message
Glad to hear it; a foul mouth, reflects a dirty mind, doesn't not make
you a better skier but a pathetic human being.


****IRONY ALERT****


Couldn't agree with you more. A truly dirty mind, a psychopathic mind, a
pathetic human being. The kind of pathetic freak who commits felonies
over
a stupid newsgroup.

"ant" wrote in message
...
bdubya wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant"
wrote:


Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and
they are way too big. You mark my words.

If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

I'd much rather make my 14 hour flights in planes that haven't crashed
much
in the past, as opposed to ones that're going to crash like hell in the
future, and kill 800 people per time.

How many times did Concordes crash?

"lal_truckee" wrote in message
news
bdubya wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant"
wrote:


Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and they
are
way too big. You mark my words.


If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

Well, since Airbus fixed their early airplane fly-by-wire software
problems (at least the obvious ones) their early designs don't crash
nearly as often.

You are referring to this demonstration?

http://www.simradar.com/Feature/2315...n_Airshow.html

The audio is especially good.

So: Who wants to be the test subjects for this latest incarnation of an
Airbus massive fly-by-wire software project? I say give them a few years
to fix the easy bugs using the French as test subjects, then the rest of
us can take the risk.

bdubya wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant" wrote:

Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and they are
way too big. You mark my words.

If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

That Howard Hughes plane, the Spruce Goose, is never going to crash.
Course, it'll never fly either, but you didn't specify that.

What do I win?

--
// Walt
//
// There is no Volkl Conspiracy

, Scott Abraham floated this notion:
[~~]
No evidence after six years.
Delusional, deranged paranoia is a Kerrison specialty.

Where's my evidence that I'm part of a conspiracy?

#317

Walt wrote:

bdubya wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:57:29 +1000, "ant" wrote:

Those airbuses are going to crash, they are not trustworthy, and they are
way too big. You mark my words.

If you can name an airliner that's never going to crash, I'd love to
hear about it.

That Howard Hughes plane, the Spruce Goose, is never going to crash.
Course, it'll never fly either, but you didn't specify that.

What do I win?

Nothing, unless you add "again" to your statement. Curiously enough, my
parents and I were down at the beach when it happened. I was too little to
remember, which is sad.

BTW, I wonder how many of us are at the MIT Time Traveler Convention.

May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC)
(events start at 8:00pm)
East Campus Courtyard, MIT
3 Ames St. Cambridge, MA 02142
42:21:36.025?N, 71:05:16.332?W
(42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)

http://web.mit.edu/adorai/timetraveler/

--
Cheers, Bev
================================================== ===============
"A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person
or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even
possibly incurring losses." -- C.M.Cipolla