A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » European Ski Resorts
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ski Speedometer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 06, 10:51 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ski Speedometer

OK all, here is the challenge, come up with a viable way of measuring
your speed on skis.

I have heard tell of using GPS, but since it will only get your
horizontal speed component, and not the verticla, it will always read
low.

What else can you think of?

Ads
  #2  
Old January 18th 06, 11:56 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 18 Jan 2006 02:51:50 -0800, "fat_boy" wrote:

OK all, here is the challenge, come up with a viable way of measuring
your speed on skis.

I have heard tell of using GPS, but since it will only get your
horizontal speed component, and not the verticla, it will always read
low.


Not so. They work in 3D so will be accurate on a slope too.

--
Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
Ski Club of Great Britain - http://www.skiclub.co.uk
All opinions expressed are personal and in no way represent those of the Ski Club.
  #3  
Old January 18th 06, 12:53 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How? If a GPS devices prime role is to give the lat and long, it will
give you your position in terms of a flat grid on the earths surface.

For it to calculate speed, it measures the change in distance over time
relative to that flat grid.

So, unless the GPS unit ALSO measures altitude, and can add a vertical
component to the calculation, it can not work for skiing.

  #4  
Old January 18th 06, 12:55 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I saw this on half baked, and it spiraled into a discussion on the
granularity of the surface of the piste.

What will really work though?

  #5  
Old January 18th 06, 12:58 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And not only that, because air is compressible its density with respect
to altitude is not constant, so the device would need calibrating (at
set altitude) to get an accurate change in altitude.

  #6  
Old January 18th 06, 01:33 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fat_boy wrote:
How? If a GPS devices prime role is to give the lat and long, it will
give you your position in terms of a flat grid on the earths surface.

For it to calculate speed, it measures the change in distance over time
relative to that flat grid.

So, unless the GPS unit ALSO measures altitude


they do
  #7  
Old January 18th 06, 01:42 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



On Wed 18 Jan '06 at 10:51 "fat_boy" wrote:

OK all, here is the challenge, come up with a viable way of measuring
your speed on skis.

I have heard tell of using GPS, but since it will only get your
horizontal speed component, and not the verticla, it will always read
low.

What else can you think of?


Agree it does 3-d, but besides, your max speed will likely be on the
horizontal, i.e. when you bottom out of the run...

They claim to measure speed pretty well:

http://www.garmin.com/products/etrexVista/spec.html

Velocity: 0.05 meter/sec steady state

(that's about +/- 1.1mph)

Remember, it has the big error on your exact location, but velocity is
measured between two locations with the same error, thus that error is
removed.


My friend clocked 91.5mph last week. I'm not sure if that's good or not...



A.
  #8  
Old January 18th 06, 01:51 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

91? Thats extraordinary. Does he often get that speed with GPS or is
it a freak result?

  #9  
Old January 18th 06, 02:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:33:17 +0100, davidof
wrote:

fat_boy wrote:
How? If a GPS devices prime role is to give the lat and long, it will
give you your position in terms of a flat grid on the earths surface.

For it to calculate speed, it measures the change in distance over time
relative to that flat grid.

So, unless the GPS unit ALSO measures altitude


they do


And devices such as the Garmin Geko 300 also contain an altimeter to
assist the accuracy problems with altitude detection. Also very
portable. I am not sure how it would stand up to the cold. The
batteries will certainly be rubbish in such temperatures.
  #10  
Old January 18th 06, 02:04 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"fat_boy" wrote in message
oups.com...
How? If a GPS devices prime role is to give the lat and long, it will
give you your position in terms of a flat grid on the earths surface.

For it to calculate speed, it measures the change in distance over time
relative to that flat grid.

So, unless the GPS unit ALSO measures altitude, and can add a vertical
component to the calculation, it can not work for skiing.


Considering the GPS system is primarily a military system used for aiming
missiles I think that the altitude is probably an important part of the
position!


--
Paul Schofield



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speedometer Peter Snowboarding 8 January 1st 04 11:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.