A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Alpine Skiing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Scott Abraham Syndrome



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 10th 10, 09:43 PM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
Scottum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 366
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote:

In article
,
*Richard Henry wrote:


In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as
suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular
characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or
willing to provide any concrete examples.


That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations
of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition?


This already well described:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional


Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical.
How pathetic.



The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them. *
Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion.


Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know
the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly
pervert.
Which I just did again.



Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw
into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it
burn hotter.


Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it
gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated.
How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the
psychopaths of rsa.



The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good
job of describing a delusion from the "inside."


RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic
mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes.


And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia
Since that's all he's thinking about today.

Where's the clock, Porkchop?
Ads
  #12  
Old May 10th 10, 11:11 PM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
twobuddha[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,075
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 1:39*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 1:11*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,


*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 12:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,


*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 11:51*am, Richard Henry wrote:
In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster
as
suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *


Translation: you lied and defamed in a futile attempt to diminish my
credibility, while hiding behind your computer like the coward you
are.


No one could possibly diminish your credibility, Scottie.


For once, I agree with you. *Compared to you freaks, I am the gold
standard of credibility.


And your delusions kick in!


Translation: another lie by a pathological liar trying to diminish the
credibility of the truth teller.
What makes this particular lie even more laughable is that a
delusional pathological liar makes the claim.
The same guy that says if he believes a lie, it is not a lie.


No one can diminish your credibility...


...because there is no lower credibility than none.


Clue time, dumb****. *If you didn't believe me, you wouldn't need to
lie about me. *Your very attacks on my credibility reinforce my
credibility. *With honest and sane people, that is.


I don't lie about you, Scottie.







I wonder if SPD agrees with you? *Obviously, not. *Day 124 of the
pathetic embarassment of Dickless Henry.


And by the same standard how many days into the embarrassment of Scott
Abraham, are we now? How many days since you claimed that Richard was
going to jail because he'd been "ratted out".


LOL


Not embarassment, dumb****. *Disappointent. *Unlike Henry, I didn't
lie to LE, and they didn't laugh at me.


Sorry, but since your whole case that SPD laughed at Richard is based on
the claim that you haven't been contacted, the same applies in reverse.


No, it does not, you stupid idiot. *Because I did not lie to LE. *And
Henry did.


Your only "proof" is that you haven't heard from them. He has that same
proof about your discussions with LE about him.



But let me know how that goes when SPD throws you out on your dumb****
ass when you try to claim I threatened your life, idiot.


I will, Scottie: you may be sure of that.


Baker, what is truly scary is that I am sure you will lie to the
police.....but not the police in your own country, where they take an
even dimmer view of making false police reports.


I won't lie to anyone, Scottie. I will present your posts.

Oooooohhhhh, I'm so scared. *Don't go ballistic when they laugh you
out of the precinct.


If you had the balls, you could be there, but I think you'll punk...
...again.







His particular
characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or
willing to provide any concrete examples.


I have caught you lying on hundreds of occasions. *You ignore being
caught, lie some more, lie about being caught, etc.
One thing for su I have not heard from SPD. *They blew you off.
How embarassing for you, lying to the cops and getting laughed at.


And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.

'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '

How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated I had contacted California
LE. Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. You are
insane.



Talk about lying and never providing proof. *I've ca8ught YOU lying
hundreds of times. *You ignore it and just keep on lying.
Call it "RSA Syndrome".


LOL


You just proved my point, you incredibly stupid idiot. *You are
insane. *Get help.


LOL


You are insane. Get help. Caught you lying again, you ignore being
caught and keep on lying.
You'd think Richard Henry would call this Dickless Henry syndrome, or
EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME syndrome.

  #13  
Old May 10th 10, 11:13 PM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
twobuddha[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,075
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 2:16*pm, pigo wrote:
On May 10, 2:39*pm, Alan Baker wrote:

Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '


How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Ohhhhh...Good one! I thought I remembered his talk of contacting
police in Poway. I thought that maybe he left off the pronoun for his
CYA?


Holy ****, Brain Fried Bob Thompson and Wack Job Baker ignoring
reality, ignoring the facts, and continuing to sell the same lie.
Hey, freak?
Didn't hear from the RCMP either. They laughed at you, idiot.
Everybody laugh at Bob Thompson for lying to the cops and getting
blown off.

It will be interesting to watch him scuttle on this one! Well,
probably not. Probably just more of the same ****. C'mon monkeyboy,
dance for us.


Since you mention scuttling, you pathetic pussy, you claimed that your
lies to Canadian LE had gotten me banned from Canada.
Had a great time up there last month.
Everybody laugh at Bob Thompson for claiming he never stated he had
gotten me banned from Canada.

  #14  
Old May 10th 10, 11:14 PM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
twobuddha[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,075
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 2:43*pm, Scottum wrote:
On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote:





On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote:


In article
,
*Richard Henry wrote:


In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as
suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular
characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or
willing to provide any concrete examples.


That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations
of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition?


This already well described:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional


Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical.
How pathetic.


The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them. *
Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion.


Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know
the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly
pervert.
Which I just did again.


Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw
into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it
burn hotter.


Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it
gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated.
How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the
psychopaths of rsa.


The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good
job of describing a delusion from the "inside."


RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic
mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes.


And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia
Since that's all he's thinking about today.


No surprise you know what the word means. First hand experience, eh?
  #15  
Old May 10th 10, 11:17 PM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,864
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of
the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.

'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '

How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated I had contacted California
LE. Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. You are
insane.


And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:

1. How did you know what they decided to do?

2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?

3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).

Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #16  
Old May 11th 10, 12:15 AM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
twobuddha[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,075
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of
the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.


'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '


How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California
LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are
insane.


And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:

1. How did you know what they decided to do?

2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?

3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).

Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.


Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I
had contacted California LE. I did not. I never said I did.
Apologize for lying. Admit you lied. That's what a man would do.
And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.
  #17  
Old May 11th 10, 12:17 AM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,864
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck
of
the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just
got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were
you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already
claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about
it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.


'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '


How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California
LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are
insane.


And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:

1. How did you know what they decided to do?

2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?

3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).

Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.


Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I
had contacted California LE. I did not. I never said I did.


So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really
trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a
California agency, are you?

Apologize for lying. Admit you lied. That's what a man would do.
And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.


How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact
with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place?

Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at!

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #18  
Old May 11th 10, 01:17 AM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
twobuddha[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,075
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,


*twobuddha wrote:
And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck
of
the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just
got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were
you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already
claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about
it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.


'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '


How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California
LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are
insane.


And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:


1. How did you know what they decided to do?


2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?


3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).


Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.


Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I
had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did.


So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really
trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a
California agency, are you?


Baker, deal with getting busted lying. Nothing semantic about it.
You lied. Period. Admit it. Be a man.

Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do.
And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.


How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact
with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place?

Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at!


I punked out? Amazing. You lied, got busted lying, continue to
justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you
talk ****.
Truly amazing. From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler.
You are insane. Get help.
  #19  
Old May 11th 10, 03:40 AM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,864
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,


*twobuddha wrote:
And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's
neck
of
the
woods, then.


Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You
just
got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What
were
you
saying about credibility?


You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already
claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about
it...


Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember
your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never
did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.


Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:


No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.


'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there,
wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried
about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '


How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if
you
never contacted them?


Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted
California
LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are
insane.


And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:


1. How did you know what they decided to do?


2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?


3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).


Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.


Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I
had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did.


So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really
trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a
California agency, are you?


Baker, deal with getting busted lying. Nothing semantic about it.
You lied. Period. Admit it. Be a man.


Where was the lie?

You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You
couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact
with law enforcement.


Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do.
And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.


How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact
with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place?

Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at!


I punked out? Amazing. You lied, got busted lying, continue to
justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you
talk ****.


Yup. Punked out... ...again.

Truly amazing. From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler.


I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower....


....and I was right!

You are insane. Get help.


Can't deal with the questions, huh?

Yeah...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #20  
Old May 11th 10, 05:22 AM posted to rec.skiing.alpine
Richard Henry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,756
Default Scott Abraham Syndrome

I guess I should also include "attempts to dominate every thread".
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scott Abraham - Banned from RSA Dick G[_2_] Alpine Skiing 0 January 15th 10 09:28 PM
FAQ about Scott Abraham A mighty Hungarian warrior Alpine Skiing 18 December 5th 08 05:28 PM
FAQ of Scott Abraham Harry Weiner Alpine Skiing 4 March 25th 08 02:16 PM
Scott Abraham ain't nothing but a thing Jeff Alpine Skiing 1 October 20th 05 10:05 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.