GI Scott?

On Dec 15, 5:58*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,



*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 14, 5:36*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 11:51*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 2:53*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 12, 9:46*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article

om,

*twobuddha wrote:

Fruitcake, I've provided proof time and time again. Every
time I
do,
you ignore reality and keep posting your insane delusions,
Fruitcake.

No, Cupcake. You say you've provided proof every time. You
never
actually provide any.

Hell, you just told a whopper of a lie today. *Since you're
demanding
quotes, find the one where I ever said I would pull out a gun
and
shoot you, Fruitcake. *Ooooops, busted. *Reality sucks, eh,
Fruitcake?
You are insane. *Get help.

LOL

Typical response from Fruitcake Baker. *Busted with a whopper of
a
lie, he LOL's. *Typical insane response. *Does not deal with the
reality of his lies, his delusions, and when confronted with
proof of
lying, laughs. *****, this nutjob is crazy.
I just provided proof you lied. *Discuss, Fruitcake. *Don't LOL.
*Be
a
reasonable, rational, honorable man, admit that you told a lie,
apologize for lying. *That's what a MAN would do, Fruitcake *And
we
all know what you are.

No, you provided no such proof, Cupcake. You provided (let's be
charitable) *assertions* without a shred of proof, and then you
assume
the truth of those assertions to "prove" additional assertions.

Holy ****, you really are insane. *You got busted in a huge lie.
Could not back it up. *Then you run again, ignoring reality, ignoring
the facts, ignoring your own words, and lie some more in a truly
insane way.
****ing crazy, Baker. *HEY, I WILL TYPE SLOW SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND.
SHOW THE QUOTE. *OR ADMIT YOU JUST MADE UP A WHOPPER OF A LIE..

Show the quote where you've threatened me with violence on sight?

Show the quote where I ever threatened you with a gun, Fruitcake. *You
made it up. *You lied. *Busted. *And you whine and rationalize and
duck. *Fruitcake.

What other form of violence were you proposing to do to me at a
distance? Hand to hand would actually require me to have done something
to bring me with in reach, and I don't think you bathe often enough for
that to ever happen, Cupcake.

Please, Cupcake: you know they're there.

Simple, really, freak. *You are so insane you cannot deal with the
reality that you just lied, got busted, and continue to lie. *What a
pathetic pussy you are!!!! *You couldn't be a man on the best day of
your life, Fruitcake. *And I'm supposed to take your word that you
will show up at a meet, when you have lied in the past and you just
got busted lying bigtime, and you continue to lie to cover it up?

I've never lied. I didn't get a simple condition of a meeting
fulfilled,
so there was never an agreement to meet.

Bull****, Fruitcake.

Simple truth, Cupcake.

You asked for a condition to be fulfilled or the meeting was off, and I
fulfilled it.

I asked for a condition to be fulfilled and you failed to meet it. How
could you possibly believe I'd be coming if you weren't going to meet my
condition?

I can only conclude that the prospect was too frightening for you,
Cupcake. After all: in Canada, you couldn't have met me strapped, now
could you?

There you go again, Fruitcake. *You truly are insane.

Yet you failed to fulfill my condition, didn't you, Cupcake?

LOL

You're a pathological liar, Fruitcake. *You don't even know when you
are lying. *How insane. *How Fruitcake Alan Baker.

LOL

I can only conclude you are insane, Fruitcake. *What makes this truly
funny is that a freak who is even more insane when he rationalizes his
cowardice follows you up.
Dickless Bob Thompson and Fruitcake Alan Baker making up ridiculous
excuses for their cowardice. *Amazing.

I'll let you know when I'm coming to Crystal, Cupcake!

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

BTW, Fruitcake, I never negotiated with you. *You are a deranged,
delusional pathological liar. *I''m supposed to negotiate with a freak
who has proven he has no honor, no ethics, no balls? *Who lies like he
breathes and blames me for making him lie? *You are insane.
I negotiate with honest, honorable men. *You do not qualify. *I
challenge freaks. *You qualify.
You got challenged. *You didn't show. *Dickless. *Now go **** yourself.

It has nothing to do with negotiation, just an understanding of reality.

You understand that *you* won't meet until you're satisfied, that means
that other people are going to behave similarly, Cupcake.

I "got challenged", but when I asked for a question to be answered that
would have taken *one* sentence, you wouldn't provide -- I assume you're
claiming on principle, ...

...but that claim falls apart on the fact that you happily provided it
*after* the meeting time had passed.

If you'd really wanted to complete your challenge, you would have met my
very minor condition.

But you didn't, did you, Cupcake?

What part of "I do not meet the conditions of pathological liars,
freaks, insane stalkers, and dickless rsa cowards" didn't you
understand then and don't you understand now, Fruitcake? I was
there. No doubt about where I set the meet, unless you are a weasel
weaseling his dickless way out of showing up. You didn't show.
Fact. Coward. You are insane, Fruitcake. Get help.
Understand reality. You are not a man. You are not worthy of
respect. You are ****, a pathetic, miserable excuse of a dickless
coward. I do not negotiate with or meet condiitons of stalkers and
usenet terrorists.
I tell you where I will be and challenge you to show up and spew your
**** in person. You didn't. Now go **** yourself, freak.

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On Dec 15, 5:58*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,



*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 14, 5:36*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 11:51*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 2:53*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article

om,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 12, 9:46*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article

ps.c
om,

*twobuddha wrote:

Fruitcake, I've provided proof time and time again. Every
time I
do,
you ignore reality and keep posting your insane
delusions,
Fruitcake.

No, Cupcake. You say you've provided proof every time. You
never
actually provide any.

Hell, you just told a whopper of a lie today. *Since
you're
demanding
quotes, find the one where I ever said I would pull out a
gun
and
shoot you, Fruitcake. *Ooooops, busted. *Reality sucks,
eh,
Fruitcake?
You are insane. *Get help.

LOL

Typical response from Fruitcake Baker. *Busted with a whopper
of
a
lie, he LOL's. *Typical insane response. *Does not deal with
the
reality of his lies, his delusions, and when confronted with
proof of
lying, laughs. *****, this nutjob is crazy.
I just provided proof you lied. *Discuss, Fruitcake. *Don't
LOL.
*Be
a
reasonable, rational, honorable man, admit that you told a
lie,
apologize for lying. *That's what a MAN would do, Fruitcake
*And
we
all know what you are.

No, you provided no such proof, Cupcake. You provided (let's be
charitable) *assertions* without a shred of proof, and then you
assume
the truth of those assertions to "prove" additional assertions.

Holy ****, you really are insane. *You got busted in a huge lie.
Could not back it up. *Then you run again, ignoring reality,
ignoring
the facts, ignoring your own words, and lie some more in a truly
insane way.
****ing crazy, Baker. *HEY, I WILL TYPE SLOW SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND.
SHOW THE QUOTE. *OR ADMIT YOU JUST MADE UP A WHOPPER OF A LIE.

Show the quote where you've threatened me with violence on sight?

Show the quote where I ever threatened you with a gun, Fruitcake.
*You
made it up. *You lied. *Busted. *And you whine and rationalize and
duck. *Fruitcake.

What other form of violence were you proposing to do to me at a
distance? Hand to hand would actually require me to have done something
to bring me with in reach, and I don't think you bathe often enough for
that to ever happen, Cupcake.

Please, Cupcake: you know they're there.

Simple, really, freak. *You are so insane you cannot deal with
the
reality that you just lied, got busted, and continue to lie.
*What a
pathetic pussy you are!!!! *You couldn't be a man on the best day
of
your life, Fruitcake. *And I'm supposed to take your word that
you
will show up at a meet, when you have lied in the past and you
just
got busted lying bigtime, and you continue to lie to cover it up?

I've never lied. I didn't get a simple condition of a meeting
fulfilled,
so there was never an agreement to meet.

Bull****, Fruitcake.

Simple truth, Cupcake.

You asked for a condition to be fulfilled or the meeting was off, and I
fulfilled it.

I asked for a condition to be fulfilled and you failed to meet it. How
could you possibly believe I'd be coming if you weren't going to meet
my
condition?

I can only conclude that the prospect was too frightening for you,
Cupcake. After all: in Canada, you couldn't have met me strapped,
now
could you?

There you go again, Fruitcake. *You truly are insane.

Yet you failed to fulfill my condition, didn't you, Cupcake?

LOL

You're a pathological liar, Fruitcake. *You don't even know when
you
are lying. *How insane. *How Fruitcake Alan Baker.

LOL

I can only conclude you are insane, Fruitcake. *What makes this truly
funny is that a freak who is even more insane when he rationalizes
his
cowardice follows you up.
Dickless Bob Thompson and Fruitcake Alan Baker making up ridiculous
excuses for their cowardice. *Amazing.

I'll let you know when I'm coming to Crystal, Cupcake!

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

BTW, Fruitcake, I never negotiated with you. *You are a deranged,
delusional pathological liar. *I''m supposed to negotiate with a freak
who has proven he has no honor, no ethics, no balls? *Who lies like he
breathes and blames me for making him lie? *You are insane.
I negotiate with honest, honorable men. *You do not qualify. *I
challenge freaks. *You qualify.
You got challenged. *You didn't show. *Dickless. *Now go **** yourself.

It has nothing to do with negotiation, just an understanding of reality.

You understand that *you* won't meet until you're satisfied, that means
that other people are going to behave similarly, Cupcake.

I "got challenged", but when I asked for a question to be answered that
would have taken *one* sentence, you wouldn't provide -- I assume you're
claiming on principle, ...

...but that claim falls apart on the fact that you happily provided it
*after* the meeting time had passed.

If you'd really wanted to complete your challenge, you would have met my
very minor condition.

But you didn't, did you, Cupcake?

What part of "I do not meet the conditions of pathological liars,
freaks, insane stalkers, and dickless rsa cowards" didn't you
understand then and don't you understand now, Fruitcake? I was
there. No doubt about where I set the meet, unless you are a weasel
weaseling his dickless way out of showing up. You didn't show.

You knew what you had to do to get me to show, Cupcake. You showed
afterwards that you weren't somehow incapacitated or unwilling to do
what was necessary.

You just safely waited until the meeting had passed.

Fact. Coward. You are insane, Fruitcake. Get help.
Understand reality. You are not a man. You are not worthy of
respect. You are ****, a pathetic, miserable excuse of a dickless
coward. I do not negotiate with or meet condiitons of stalkers and
usenet terrorists.

Since I'm neither, what has that to do with me, Cupcake?

I tell you where I will be and challenge you to show up and spew your
**** in person. You didn't. Now go **** yourself, freak.

You made your appearance conditional and I showed my willingness to be
there by fulfilling your condition. You can hardly be surprised if
failing to meet my condition means I'm not going to show.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Dec 15, 11:23*pm, Ted Waldron wrote:
In article

,
*Dave Cartman wrote:

In article ,
*Ted Waldron wrote:

In article
,
*twobuddha wrote:

*You're insane, but
you're not crazy.

Paradox, HTH.

Scott is sort of the "Tai Chi Skiing" of the psychiatric community. *He
really likes the words but doesn't care for their meanings, so he
substitutes his own.

* He can substitute all the meanings he wants to his delusional mind's
content, it still is a paradoxical statement. *Much like for years, he
didn't know the difference between "slander" and libel. *he likes to use
"Slander" because it sounds much more outrageous.

* I just like how he idiotically uses "insane", and I doubt he knows the
only professional that can label someone as "insane". Here is a hint,
Scooter It isn't a medical doctor. "Insane" isn't a medical term.

Insane is a description. Fits you to a T. Show the post, Ted.
As for knowing the difference between slander and libel, **** if I
care. All I know is that you lie your ass off. Commit felony
perjury.
Tell you what, you insane dickless freak.
Was falsely accusing me of threatening you, in court, slander or
libel?
Show the post, Ted.

On Dec 15, 8:30*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,



*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 15, 5:58*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 14, 5:36*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 11:51*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 13, 2:53*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article

om,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 12, 9:46*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article

ps.c
om,

*twobuddha wrote:

Fruitcake, I've provided proof time and time again. Every
time I
do,
you ignore reality and keep posting your insane
delusions,
Fruitcake.

No, Cupcake. You say you've provided proof every time.. You
never
actually provide any.

Hell, you just told a whopper of a lie today. *Since
you're
demanding
quotes, find the one where I ever said I would pull out a
gun
and
shoot you, Fruitcake. *Ooooops, busted. *Reality sucks,
eh,
Fruitcake?
You are insane. *Get help.

LOL

Typical response from Fruitcake Baker. *Busted with a whopper
of
a
lie, he LOL's. *Typical insane response. *Does not deal with
the
reality of his lies, his delusions, and when confronted with
proof of
lying, laughs. *****, this nutjob is crazy.
I just provided proof you lied. *Discuss, Fruitcake. *Don't
LOL.
*Be
a
reasonable, rational, honorable man, admit that you told a
lie,
apologize for lying. *That's what a MAN would do, Fruitcake
*And
we
all know what you are.

No, you provided no such proof, Cupcake. You provided (let's be
charitable) *assertions* without a shred of proof, and then you
assume
the truth of those assertions to "prove" additional assertions.

Holy ****, you really are insane. *You got busted in a huge lie.
Could not back it up. *Then you run again, ignoring reality,
ignoring
the facts, ignoring your own words, and lie some more in a truly
insane way.
****ing crazy, Baker. *HEY, I WILL TYPE SLOW SO YOU CAN
UNDERSTAND.
SHOW THE QUOTE. *OR ADMIT YOU JUST MADE UP A WHOPPER OF A LIE.

Show the quote where you've threatened me with violence on sight?

Show the quote where I ever threatened you with a gun, Fruitcake.
*You
made it up. *You lied. *Busted. *And you whine and rationalize and
duck. *Fruitcake.

What other form of violence were you proposing to do to me at a
distance? Hand to hand would actually require me to have done something
to bring me with in reach, and I don't think you bathe often enough for
that to ever happen, Cupcake.

Please, Cupcake: you know they're there.

Simple, really, freak. *You are so insane you cannot deal with
the
reality that you just lied, got busted, and continue to lie..
*What a
pathetic pussy you are!!!! *You couldn't be a man on the best day
of
your life, Fruitcake. *And I'm supposed to take your word that
you
will show up at a meet, when you have lied in the past and you
just
got busted lying bigtime, and you continue to lie to cover it up?

I've never lied. I didn't get a simple condition of a meeting
fulfilled,
so there was never an agreement to meet.

Bull****, Fruitcake.

Simple truth, Cupcake.

You asked for a condition to be fulfilled or the meeting was off, and I
fulfilled it.

I asked for a condition to be fulfilled and you failed to meet it.. How
could you possibly believe I'd be coming if you weren't going to meet
my
condition?

I can only conclude that the prospect was too frightening for you,
Cupcake. After all: in Canada, you couldn't have met me strapped,
now
could you?

There you go again, Fruitcake. *You truly are insane.

Yet you failed to fulfill my condition, didn't you, Cupcake?

LOL

You're a pathological liar, Fruitcake. *You don't even know when
you
are lying. *How insane. *How Fruitcake Alan Baker.

LOL

I can only conclude you are insane, Fruitcake. *What makes this truly
funny is that a freak who is even more insane when he rationalizes
his
cowardice follows you up.
Dickless Bob Thompson and Fruitcake Alan Baker making up ridiculous
excuses for their cowardice. *Amazing.

I'll let you know when I'm coming to Crystal, Cupcake!

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

BTW, Fruitcake, I never negotiated with you. *You are a deranged,
delusional pathological liar. *I''m supposed to negotiate with a freak
who has proven he has no honor, no ethics, no balls? *Who lies like he
breathes and blames me for making him lie? *You are insane.
I negotiate with honest, honorable men. *You do not qualify. *I
challenge freaks. *You qualify.
You got challenged. *You didn't show. *Dickless. *Now go **** yourself.

It has nothing to do with negotiation, just an understanding of reality.

You understand that *you* won't meet until you're satisfied, that means
that other people are going to behave similarly, Cupcake.

I "got challenged", but when I asked for a question to be answered that
would have taken *one* sentence, you wouldn't provide -- I assume you're
claiming on principle, ...

...but that claim falls apart on the fact that you happily provided it
*after* the meeting time had passed.

If you'd really wanted to complete your challenge, you would have met my
very minor condition.

But you didn't, did you, Cupcake?

What part of "I do not meet the conditions of pathological liars,
freaks, insane stalkers, and dickless rsa cowards" didn't you
understand then and don't you understand now, Fruitcake? *I was
there. *No doubt about where I set the meet, unless you are a weasel
weaseling his dickless way out of showing up. *You didn't show.

You knew what you had to do to get me to show, Cupcake. You showed
afterwards that you weren't somehow incapacitated or unwilling to do
what was necessary.

You just safely waited until the meeting had passed.

Fact. *Coward. *You are insane, Fruitcake. *Get help.
Understand reality. *You are not a man. *You are not worthy of
respect. *You are ****, a pathetic, miserable excuse of a dickless
coward. *I do not negotiate with or meet condiitons of stalkers and
usenet terrorists.

Since I'm neither, what has that to do with me, Cupcake?

I tell you where I will be and challenge you to show up and spew your
**** in person. *You didn't. *Now go **** yourself, freak.

You made your appearance conditional and I showed my willingness to be
there by fulfilling your condition. You can hardly be surprised if
failing to meet my condition means I'm not going to show.

Just can't reason with you, Fruitcake. Go **** yourself.

On Dec 18, 1:23*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:

snip



...but that claim falls apart on the fact that you happily provided it
*after* the meeting time had passed.

If you'd really wanted to complete your challenge, you would have met
my
very minor condition.

But you didn't, did you, Cupcake?

What part of "I do not meet the conditions of pathological liars,
freaks, insane stalkers, and dickless rsa cowards" didn't you
understand then and don't you understand now, Fruitcake? *I was
there. *No doubt about where I set the meet, unless you are a weasel
weaseling his dickless way out of showing up. *You didn't show.

You knew what you had to do to get me to show, Cupcake. You showed
afterwards that you weren't somehow incapacitated or unwilling to do
what was necessary.

You just safely waited until the meeting had passed.

No answer, of course.



Fact. *Coward. *You are insane, Fruitcake. *Get help.
Understand reality. *You are not a man. *You are not worthy of
respect. *You are ****, a pathetic, miserable excuse of a dickless
coward. *I do not negotiate with or meet condiitons of stalkers and
usenet terrorists.

Since I'm neither, what has that to do with me, Cupcake?

Well, Cupcake?

You are insane, Fruitcake. I do not negotiate with or meet conditions
of pathological liars, either....and you are certainly that. Nor do I
negotiate with the mentally ill. You, Fruitcake. You have proven
beyond any doubt that you have no honor, that you are so delusional
you forget reality if it conflicts with your insane delusions.



I tell you where I will be and challenge you to show up and spew your
**** in person. *You didn't. *Now go **** yourself, freak.

You made your appearance conditional and I showed my willingness to be
there by fulfilling your condition. You can hardly be surprised if
failing to meet my condition means I'm not going to show.

Just can't reason with you, Fruitcake. *Go **** yourself.

What you mean to say is, you don't actually have an explanation that
will withstand the smell test (much like your wares on eBay, I'm sure)
and so you'll just declare I'm "insane"...

I just reasoned with you. You ignored it. That is insane.

LOL

You are insane, Fruitcake.

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On Dec 18, 1:23*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:

snip



...but that claim falls apart on the fact that you happily provided
it
*after* the meeting time had passed.

If you'd really wanted to complete your challenge, you would have
met
my
very minor condition.

But you didn't, did you, Cupcake?

What part of "I do not meet the conditions of pathological liars,
freaks, insane stalkers, and dickless rsa cowards" didn't you
understand then and don't you understand now, Fruitcake? *I was
there. *No doubt about where I set the meet, unless you are a weasel
weaseling his dickless way out of showing up. *You didn't show.

You knew what you had to do to get me to show, Cupcake. You showed
afterwards that you weren't somehow incapacitated or unwilling to do
what was necessary.

You just safely waited until the meeting had passed.

No answer, of course.

LOL




Fact. *Coward. *You are insane, Fruitcake. *Get help.
Understand reality. *You are not a man. *You are not worthy of
respect. *You are ****, a pathetic, miserable excuse of a dickless
coward. *I do not negotiate with or meet condiitons of stalkers and
usenet terrorists.

Since I'm neither, what has that to do with me, Cupcake?

Well, Cupcake?

You are insane, Fruitcake. I do not negotiate with or meet conditions
of pathological liars, either....and you are certainly that. Nor do I
negotiate with the mentally ill. You, Fruitcake. You have proven
beyond any doubt that you have no honor, that you are so delusional
you forget reality if it conflicts with your insane delusions.

LOL




I tell you where I will be and challenge you to show up and spew your
**** in person. *You didn't. *Now go **** yourself, freak.

You made your appearance conditional and I showed my willingness to be
there by fulfilling your condition. You can hardly be surprised if
failing to meet my condition means I'm not going to show.

Just can't reason with you, Fruitcake. *Go **** yourself.

What you mean to say is, you don't actually have an explanation that
will withstand the smell test (much like your wares on eBay, I'm sure)
and so you'll just declare I'm "insane"...

I just reasoned with you. You ignored it. That is insane.

No, Cupcake. Reasoning involves statements that support your
proposition; evidence, etc.

You just bleat.


LOL

You are insane, Fruitcake.

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg