If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job.. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it.. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 11:34*am, Scottum wrote:
On May 11, 12:07*pm, Ted Waldron wrote: In article , *Scottum wrote: On May 10, 5:14*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 2:43*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *Richard Henry wrote: In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or willing to provide any concrete examples. That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition? This already well described: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical. How pathetic. The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them. * Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion. Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly pervert. Which I just did again. Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it burn hotter. Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated. How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the psychopaths of rsa. The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good job of describing a delusion from the "inside." RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes. And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia Since that's all he's thinking about today. No surprise you know what the word means. *First hand experience, eh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You are the one who doesn't stop talking about it, not me. http://tinyurl.com/2d8yrdg "Pop Tarts are what you eat when Bootsie lays a log in your mouth and tells you to swallow." besides probably hundreds of scatological posts by Scooter.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ain't Google a bitch, Scatt?- No. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 12:02*pm, "Bob F" wrote:
Ted Waldron wrote: plonk!! Is that the sound Ted makes when he chomps down on a fresh Pop Tart? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 11:07*am, Ted Waldron wrote:
In article , *Scottum wrote: On May 10, 5:14*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 2:43*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *Richard Henry wrote: In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or willing to provide any concrete examples. That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition? This already well described: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical. How pathetic. The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them.. * Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion. Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly pervert. Which I just did again. Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it burn hotter. Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated. How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the psychopaths of rsa. The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good job of describing a delusion from the "inside." RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes. And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia Since that's all he's thinking about today. No surprise you know what the word means. *First hand experience, eh?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You are the one who doesn't stop talking about it, not me. http://tinyurl.com/2d8yrdg "Pop Tarts are what you eat when Bootsie lays a log in your mouth and tells you to swallow." besides probably hundreds of scatological posts by Scooter Teddy, Teddy. For every time I tell you freaks to go **** yourself, I can find ten where you freaks go scatalogical and accuse me of everything from raping children and mass murder to ****ing Anthea. How hypocritical. How ridiculous. Now normal for Ted Waldron. Show the post, Ted, or lay a log in your mouth and have a Pop Tart. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHA |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 10:33*am, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 11, 9:36*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 10:22*pm, Richard Henry wrote: I guess I should also include "attempts to dominate every thread". How dickless of you, Dickless Henry. *You start a thread that grossly defames me, that lies about me, and then you have the gall to criticize me when I expose you as a pathological liar? Typical psychopathic Dickless Richard Henry behavior. Day 123 of the Embarassment of Richard Henry. *Hey, still waiting for that call from SPD. *Or contact info? EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!! Let's see - so far we have 1. *Accuses others of lying and then is not able or willing to provide any concrete examples. Bull****. That is an outright lie. 2. *Attempts to dominate every thread. Another outright lie. I merely object to your lies. As I do in this post. 3. *When criticized, responds with obscenities and nonsense phrases. If you want to call outright lies, defamations, and threats "criticism", I plead guilty. Here is my favorite nonsense phrase, preceded by an obscenity. Go **** yourself, EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!! Everybody laugh at Richard Henry for getting busted in such a ridiculous chain of bull****. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA HAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHABW HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article om, *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower.... ...and I was right! You are insane. *Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? You are insane. *Get help. And we're down to your cop out. You said you that "LE didn't act on it" where "it" was information regarding Richard Henry. How could you have said that if you didn't contact them? Or were you lying then? No, Baker, we are down to you rationalizing getting busted telling another whopper of a lie, and avoiding taking responsibility for your lies. As usual. A man would man up. But everybody knows you are not a man. Go **** yourself, wack job. What was the lie? The quote I gave? You said that "LE decided not to act on it" where "it" was something you acted on. How you know of that decision and why were they even making a decision in the first place if you hadn't contacted them? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 1:30*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article om, *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying.. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower.... ...and I was right! You are insane. *Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? You are insane. *Get help. And we're down to your cop out. You said you that "LE didn't act on it" where "it" was information regarding Richard Henry. How could you have said that if you didn't contact them? Or were you lying then? No, Baker, we are down to you rationalizing getting busted telling another whopper of a lie, and avoiding taking responsibility for your lies. *As usual. *A man would man up. *But everybody knows you are not a man. Go **** yourself, wack job. What was the lie? The quote I gave? You said that "LE decided not to act on it" where "it" was something you acted on. How you know of that decision and why were they even making a decision in the first place if you hadn't contacted them? You got busted in an outright lie. Man up. Stop making excuses. Stop blaming me. You lied. You got caught. For once in your nutless, pussy life, act like a man. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 1:30*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article m, *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article ps.c om, *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower.... ...and I was right! You are insane. *Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? You are insane. *Get help. And we're down to your cop out. You said you that "LE didn't act on it" where "it" was information regarding Richard Henry. How could you have said that if you didn't contact them? Or were you lying then? No, Baker, we are down to you rationalizing getting busted telling another whopper of a lie, and avoiding taking responsibility for your lies. *As usual. *A man would man up. *But everybody knows you are not a man. Go **** yourself, wack job. What was the lie? The quote I gave? You said that "LE decided not to act on it" where "it" was something you acted on. How you know of that decision and why were they even making a decision in the first place if you hadn't contacted them? You got busted in an outright lie. Man up. Stop making excuses. What lie was that? Stop blaming me. You lied. You got caught. For once in your nutless, pussy life, act like a man. Right after you tell me in straightforward language what you're claiming I lied about... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 11, 1:55*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 1:30*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article m, *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article ps.c om, *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie.. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower..... ...and I was right! You are insane. *Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? You are insane. *Get help. And we're down to your cop out. You said you that "LE didn't act on it" where "it" was information regarding Richard Henry. How could you have said that if you didn't contact them? Or were you lying then? No, Baker, we are down to you rationalizing getting busted telling another whopper of a lie, and avoiding taking responsibility for your lies. *As usual. *A man would man up. *But everybody knows you are not a man. Go **** yourself, wack job. What was the lie? The quote I gave? You said that "LE decided not to act on it" where "it" was something you acted on. How you know of that decision and why were they even making a decision in the first place if you hadn't contacted them? You got busted in an outright lie. *Man up. *Stop making excuses. What lie was that? Amazing. When busted in an outright lie, ignore being caught and keep playing the pppppuuuussssssyyyyyyy game. Stop blaming me. *You lied. *You got caught. *For once in your nutless, pussy life, act like a man. Right after you tell me in straightforward language what you're claiming I lied about... Already have. You ignore being caught, As usual. Here is some straightforward language. You are a pathological liar. You are a stalking, craven coward. You are delusional, mentally ill asshole. Man up, Baker. Stop playing games. Stop lying. Get help, and you will need a lot of it. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 1:55*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 1:30*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 11, 10:08*am, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 8:40*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article om, *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article s.co m, *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article grou ps.c om, *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. *Nothing semantic about it. You lied. *Period. *Admit it. *Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? *Amazing. *You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. *From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower.... ...and I was right! You are insane. *Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? You are insane. *Get help. And we're down to your cop out. You said you that "LE didn't act on it" where "it" was information regarding Richard Henry. How could you have said that if you didn't contact them? Or were you lying then? No, Baker, we are down to you rationalizing getting busted telling another whopper of a lie, and avoiding taking responsibility for your lies. *As usual. *A man would man up. *But everybody knows you are not a man. Go **** yourself, wack job. What was the lie? The quote I gave? You said that "LE decided not to act on it" where "it" was something you acted on. How you know of that decision and why were they even making a decision in the first place if you hadn't contacted them? You got busted in an outright lie. *Man up. *Stop making excuses. What lie was that? Amazing. When busted in an outright lie, ignore being caught and keep playing the pppppuuuussssssyyyyyyy game. I haven't lied. You did claim to have contacted LE regarding Richard Henry. Stop blaming me. *You lied. *You got caught. *For once in your nutless, pussy life, act like a man. Right after you tell me in straightforward language what you're claiming I lied about... Already have. You ignore being caught, As usual. Here is some straightforward language. You are a pathological liar. You are a stalking, craven coward. You are delusional, mentally ill asshole. Man up, Baker. Stop playing games. Stop lying. Get help, and you will need a lot of it. No, you haven't. Say it straight, pussy-boi. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scott Abraham - Banned from RSA | Dick G[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 0 | January 15th 10 08:28 PM |
FAQ about Scott Abraham | A mighty Hungarian warrior | Alpine Skiing | 18 | December 5th 08 04:28 PM |
FAQ of Scott Abraham | Harry Weiner | Alpine Skiing | 4 | March 25th 08 01:16 PM |
Scott Abraham ain't nothing but a thing | Jeff | Alpine Skiing | 1 | October 20th 05 10:05 PM |