RGPM watered down...

"Peg Smith" wrote in message
...

I won't vote for anything that
would make you happy.

Yes, well, that's a good reason.

As far as I know, the last usenet group that spawned off a moderated
daughter was rec.skiing.alpine - rec.skiing.alpine.moderated a little over
a year ago. If you want to see the value of a moderated group, look at the
difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by one or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.

Note: rsam may not yet be carried on your news server. It is caried on
google groups, however.

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
news:Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02...

difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by one
or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content
there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.


Great! I'm so damned happy for RSA I could spit! If ever there was a case
for moderation that was surely it.

RGP is not.

JT

in article Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02, Richard Henry at
wrote on 3/11/04 12:00 PM:


"Peg Smith" wrote in message
...

I won't vote for anything that
would make you happy.

Yes, well, that's a good reason.

As far as I know, the last usenet group that spawned off a moderated
daughter was rec.skiing.alpine - rec.skiing.alpine.moderated a little over
a year ago. If you want to see the value of a moderated group, look at the
difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by one or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.

Note: rsam may not yet be carried on your news server. It is caried on
google groups, however.



RSA.Terrorist is censored, and no one can tell the truth about the criminal
acts of the moderators and participants. Richard Henry is one of the worst
of the stalking criminals.
If you want to see a bunch of criminals censoring the truth about their
felonies and depravities, while continuing to harass on an uncensored
newsgroup, try rsa.terrorist.
As for perverting threads, check out the false allegations of molesting
children, death threats, and sick defamations Richard Henry and his buddies
spew on a regular basis.

in article , JTAutry at
wrote on 3/11/04 4:56 PM:

"Richard Henry" wrote in message
news:Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02...

difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by one
or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content
there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.


Great! I'm so damned happy for RSA I could spit! If ever there was a case
for moderation that was surely it.

So you think the very people who ruin a newsgroup with stalking, criminal
acts, defamation, threats, and real life harassment should be rewarded with
their own private newsgroup? Because that's exactly what happened.

"scottabe" wrote in message
...
in article Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02, Richard Henry at
wrote on 3/11/04 12:00 PM:


"Peg Smith" wrote in message
...

I won't vote for anything that
would make you happy.

Yes, well, that's a good reason.

As far as I know, the last usenet group that spawned off a moderated
daughter was rec.skiing.alpine - rec.skiing.alpine.moderated a little
over
a year ago. If you want to see the value of a moderated group, look at
the
difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by
one or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now
RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content
there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.

Note: rsam may not yet be carried on your news server. It is caried on
google groups, however.

RSA.Terrorist is censored, and no one can tell the truth about the
criminal
acts of the moderators and participants. Richard Henry is one of the
worst
of the stalking criminals.
If you want to see a bunch of criminals censoring the truth about their
felonies and depravities, while continuing to harass on an uncensored
newsgroup, try rsa.terrorist.
As for perverting threads, check out the false allegations of molesting
children, death threats, and sick defamations Richard Henry and his
buddies
spew on a regular basis.

Thus we see the need for RSA Moderated.

You can always count on Scott to bark when needed.

in article y%84c.4073$uh.2080@fed1read02, Richard Henry at
wrote on 3/11/04 6:11 PM:


"scottabe" wrote in message
...
in article Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02, Richard Henry at
wrote on 3/11/04 12:00 PM:


"Peg Smith" wrote in message
...

I won't vote for anything that
would make you happy.

Yes, well, that's a good reason.

As far as I know, the last usenet group that spawned off a moderated
daughter was rec.skiing.alpine - rec.skiing.alpine.moderated a little
over
a year ago. If you want to see the value of a moderated group, look at
the
difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by
one or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now
RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content
there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.

Note: rsam may not yet be carried on your news server. It is caried on
google groups, however.

RSA.Terrorist is censored, and no one can tell the truth about the
criminal
acts of the moderators and participants. Richard Henry is one of the
worst
of the stalking criminals.
If you want to see a bunch of criminals censoring the truth about their
felonies and depravities, while continuing to harass on an uncensored
newsgroup, try rsa.terrorist.
As for perverting threads, check out the false allegations of molesting
children, death threats, and sick defamations Richard Henry and his
buddies
spew on a regular basis.

Thus we see the need for RSA Moderated.

You can always count on Scott to bark when needed.

Richard Henry needs rsa.moderated, because I tell the truth about his
criminal harassment. Of course, he does not object to death threats, false
allegations of molesting children, gross defamation, and all the rest of the
vile tactics used by him and his fellow criminals to control the newsgroup.
No matter how vile or criminal their behavior on rsa, Richard Henry and his
sick psychopathic friends are allowed to post to rsa.terrorist. As long as
they don't tell the truth about rsa.t.

In news.groups Richard Henry wrote:

"scottabe" wrote in message
...
in article Sz34c.4020$uh.623@fed1read02, Richard Henry at
wrote on 3/11/04 12:00 PM:


"Peg Smith" wrote in message
...

I won't vote for anything that
would make you happy.

Yes, well, that's a good reason.

As far as I know, the last usenet group that spawned off a moderated
daughter was rec.skiing.alpine - rec.skiing.alpine.moderated a little
over
a year ago. If you want to see the value of a moderated group, look at
the
difference in postings between those two. RSA whad been afflicted by
one or
two posters who perverted every thread to their personal crusade. Now
RSA
is still open for the flamers (and there is stil much skiing content
there),
while RSAM is purely on topic.

Note: rsam may not yet be carried on your news server. It is caried on
google groups, however.

RSA.Terrorist is censored, and no one can tell the truth about the
criminal
acts of the moderators and participants. Richard Henry is one of the
worst
of the stalking criminals.
If you want to see a bunch of criminals censoring the truth about their
felonies and depravities, while continuing to harass on an uncensored
newsgroup, try rsa.terrorist.
As for perverting threads, check out the false allegations of molesting
children, death threats, and sick defamations Richard Henry and his
buddies
spew on a regular basis.

Thus we see the need for RSA Moderated.

You can always count on Scott to bark when needed.

So Scott is still around? I thought that after he got his rear end
kicked in the RSAM vote he'd crawled back under his rock and disappeared.

--
Wayne Brown (HPCC #1104) | "When your tail's in a crack, you improvise
| if you're good enough. Otherwise you give
| your pelt to the trapper."
"e^(i*pi) = -1" -- Euler | -- John Myers Myers, "Silverlock"