If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
On Jan 1, 7:16*pm, twobuddha wrote:
On Jan 1, 12:02*pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Jan 1, 11:31*am, twobuddha wrote: On Dec 22 2008, 9:30*pm, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Yeah like your Rabbi. The one that was investigated for fraud. Nice. Whatever happened to him? And cleared. *Well respected. *Fine guy. *There is no point in describing my social circles to you. I guess you definition of "cleared" includes admission of guilt, promise to repay, fleeing town, and then renegging on the promise. Way to make up some more ridiculous lies, freak!!!!!!! *None of it is true. *How ridiculous. *How pathetic. *How Dickless Henry Did I miss anything? You didn't accuse him of molesting children. *You're slipping, freak. "In a meeting of Temple de Hirsch Sinai's congregants and in a letter which was sent to them, Rosen announced that Starr had agreed to pay back the diverted funds over a period of several years, and that no further action would be necessary. Temple members expressed their shock, sense of betrayal, pain, disappointment, and sadness in widely published reports. Still, it appeared that the tragic chapter in the 103-year-old Temple's history was about to close. On June 20, however, Rosen sent another letter to Temple members telling them that Starr reneged on his agreement to repay the funds." http://archive.seattlepressonline.com/article-9880.html |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
On Jan 1, 7:34*pm, Richard Henry wrote:
On Jan 1, 7:16*pm, twobuddha wrote: On Jan 1, 12:02*pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Jan 1, 11:31*am, twobuddha wrote: On Dec 22 2008, 9:30*pm, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Yeah like your Rabbi. The one that was investigated for fraud. Nice. Whatever happened to him? And cleared. *Well respected. *Fine guy. *There is no point in describing my social circles to you. I guess you definition of "cleared" includes admission of guilt, promise to repay, fleeing town, and then renegging on the promise. Way to make up some more ridiculous lies, freak!!!!!!! *None of it is true. *How ridiculous. *How pathetic. *How Dickless Henry Did I miss anything? You didn't accuse him of molesting children. *You're slipping, freak. "In a meeting of Temple de Hirsch Sinai's congregants and in a letter which was sent to them, Rosen announced that Starr had agreed to pay back the diverted funds over a period of several years, and that no further action would be necessary. Temple members expressed their shock, sense of betrayal, pain, disappointment, and sadness in widely published reports. Still, it appeared that the tragic chapter in the 103-year-old Temple's history was about to close. On June 20, however, Rosen sent another letter to Temple members telling them that Starr reneged on his agreement to repay the funds." http://archive.seattlepressonline.com/article-9880.html Rosen is a lying piece of **** that got badly embarassed in court. They ended up paying damages. Rosen belongs he as big a fraud as I've ever met. Rabbi never agreed, and he never paid them a cent. Period. Typical: one liar gets quoted in the press, another liar quotes him. Sorta like the stories those lazy ****s did on this ********. What is even more pathetic is that you are reaching back ten years in your attempt to discredit me. And you still get busted lying. Again. Fleeing? Busted. Reneged? Busted. Everything you said is a lie. Richard Henry, Dickless Freak. Don't you have an emergency soccer game? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
In article
, twobuddha wrote: "In a meeting of Temple de Hirsch Sinai's congregants and in a letter which was sent to them, Rosen announced that Starr had agreed to pay back the diverted funds over a period of several years, and that no further action would be necessary. Temple members expressed their shock, sense of betrayal, pain, disappointment, and sadness in widely published reports. Still, it appeared that the tragic chapter in the 103-year-old Temple's history was about to close. On June 20, however, Rosen sent another letter to Temple members telling them that Starr reneged on his agreement to repay the funds." http://archive.seattlepressonline.com/article-9880.html Rosen is a lying piece of **** that got badly embarassed in court. They ended up paying damages. Rosen belongs he as big a fraud as I've ever met. Rabbi never agreed, and he never paid them a cent. Period. Typical: one liar gets quoted in the press, another liar quotes him. Sorta like the stories those lazy ****s did on this ********. What is even more pathetic is that you are reaching back ten years in your attempt to discredit me. And you still get busted lying. Again. Fleeing? Busted. Reneged? Busted. Everything you said is a lie. Richard Henry, Dickless Freak. Don't you have an emergency soccer game? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA Hmmmm, they left those details out of this story too, written by his biggest (well second biggest) fan: http://www.seattleweekly.com/2002-05...llen-starr.php "The media have been remarkably kind to the man, emphasizing his community work‹marching with Martin Luther King Jr., growing the temple membership, his openness to other religions, and educating believers and goyim alike on what it means to be a Jew. (In fact, the temple membership has been even more kind, not bringing Starr up on formal charges and allowing him to repay the money over time.) My fundamental impulse is to hold this man in my arms and say, "You are forgiven, dear sir, but perhaps the clergy was never your real calling. Try something else. Find another way to make amends." But he's run off to Phoenix, in declining health and apparently not wanting to face individual congregants about the details of his alleged misdemeanors." (end quote) Man I'd love to commit a couple of $400,000 misdemeanors! I'd be there with a orange jumpsuit on, picking up trash on the side of the road on three consecutive weekends, and when the shoplifters and DWIs asked what they got me on, I'd smile and say, "I stole $400,000 from a synagogue" and they'd say, "Only three weekends for $400,000!!!!" And I'd say, yeah, they went easy on me because it was all in pledges. (thank you, I'll be here all week |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
On Jan 1, 11:31*am, twobuddha wrote:
On Dec 22 2008, 9:30*pm, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon wrote: On Dec 22, 2:44*pm, twobuddha wrote: On Dec 22, 12:31*am, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon *You have no idea what I can understand. Bull****. *I know you quite well. On the basis of what? *You don't even know how many children I have. On the basis of what you write here. * Okay. So, as I have explained to you a dozen times. what you read here is highly edited text. Some of it is schtick, as when I talk of applying the Wire Brush of Enlightenment (tm) to my Vailized Schlong (tm), and some of it something else, but all of it is concocted. Who you associate with. * I associate with troubled souls. And unlike so many who used to post here, I am associating with you. Associating with people does not equal approving of them, or everything they do. It just means I find them interesting. Easy, really. *I pity your children. *They will be freaks, too. Don't bother pitying them, Scott. They get a father who loves them unconditionally, who corrects them when they are wrong and celebrates them when they succeed. They get a father who is everything your father was not, and everything you could never be. You can ask them about it. they got no complaints. Well, except for the homework. They would appreciate more relaxed homework standards. Damn, that's funny. *A sociopath telling me I have no insight. Geez, I know a whole bunch of shrinks who think I have plenty. *And an ignorant sociopath who tells me I don't. Once again you can say the words, but you cannot abstract their meaning. Once again, you are incapable of understanding the meaning. *Because you are an ignorant sociopath. Makes all kinds of sense to me. *But then again, I'm not a sociopath. You would not understand. You keep saying this word, sociopath, yet you don't seem to realize how well it applies to you. Cite evidence to the contrary. Trying to tell me I don't know is just more douchenozzlery. Clueless. *The evidence is in your post. *And you are too ****ing stupid to know it. *No psychological insight. *Typical of a sociopath. This post is just a bunch of text I'm typing at you late at night. It's not everything I think. It is only the text I am typing. *Please explain how you can infer anything from my post. Trained observer of humanity, freak, and i've had a lot of posts to study, dumb****. *You are a sociopath. You can't even attribute posts properly to the author that wrote them, how do you expect to convince anyone you have successfully studied posts, which we have already established, are designed to create an 'internet persona' rather than being the real thing. This is the problem with you, Ding Dong. You are your internet persona. Loud, crude, misogynistic, stupidly argumentative, and profoundly wrong about almost everything. You would make a great character for a novel. But as a person, you got gaps. More histrionics. Describe your social circles. Don't name them. I don't want to know. Describe them. Then explain to me how they would be able to tell jack **** about me, aside from your girlish wailing. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! *A dickless freak who committed felonies over a stupid newsgroup, and has hid his dickless ass for all this time, calling ME girlish? I'm easy enough to find, Scott. You'll just have to get up off of your dick-filled ass and find me. I can't be expected to present myself at your leisure to be bored to death. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hey, freak? *YOU stalked ME! *YOU committed felonies and participated in a criminal conspiracy that has repeatedly threatened my life! Oh whatever. Anything I have participated in has probably prolonged your life by keeping you away from people that would terminate it. Restraining orders work both ways. They keep people that shouldn't be together from being in the same place. It's good for all parties. How we ended up with an internet ban is beyond me. Clue time, sociopath. *You're a dickless freak, so you don't understand that honor, ethics, and manliness mean YOU have the onus of showing up and making good on your threats. So what? I've offered to take you to a baseball game and to buy you lunch. Given your rather bizarre and incorrect interpretation of the law I won't be knocking on your door to make good on my "threat," but if you are so indigent as to be unable to make it to my threat of lunch, I suppose I could send a cab. I'd send a towncar, but the people I use are Russians and kind of intimidating. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Clue time, girlish sociopath. *There is no point in describing my social circles to you. *They are evolved, spiritual, decent people. Yeah like your Rabbi. The one that was investigated for fraud. Nice. Whatever happened to him? And cleared. *Well respected. *Fine guy. *There is no point in describing my social circles to you. What amazes me is how desperate your freaks get to find anything in anyone's past to discredit them.....while lying and lying your dickless asses off. Yeah I can see how Rabbi Starr would resonate with you, being as how the two of you are "help yourself to everything you can grab kinda" people. But let me guess. They are composed of men. Older men. *Men who have be wronged, and wronged hard, like the protagonist in a Clint Eastwood Movie. Bitter men who turned to bad habits while trying to conceal their hurt. Am I right yet? Absolutely, completely wrong. *Typical sociopath. *How laughable you are, freak. Incomplete sentences again, Scott. You are lying and I am right. How laughable you are, freak. *Busted lying, you continue to defend your lie. ***** yourself, freak. How was I busted lying? Typical of a sociopath, you demand others agree with your assessment of yourself as a superior human being. Oh bull****. I have a negative self image, self destructive tendencies and only show up here to see if you've finally learned enough to deliver a stinging blow. Doing pretty damn good, freak. *Got you foaming at the mouth and lying your ass off. *Amusing. This isn't foaming. You aren't ready to see foaming. This is still me, chewing a a size nine hole in your ass. Don't be ****ing ridiculous. The vast majority of psychologists have bills to pay, and would be happy to take money from me, or my insurer, or whatever. They aren't clergy. They aren't answering the call from God. They are professionals trying to do a compentent job and trying to get paid doing it. Very few of them work with character disordered sociopaths. *Of course, you could try it sometime. *Which you never have. Okay, send a recommendation. I'm not sure why you want me to work with a character disordered sociopath, because, obviously I've already worked with you. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go though life, son. I am happy that you have social circles that accept you and enjoy your personality quirks. Everybody needs friends to help them get by in this world. But you have been banned from: a number of AA meetings (reportedly, though I was not there to witness it). No reportedly about it. *That is an outright lie. *How pathetic. *How laughable. Well, that's why I said "reportedly." Because the people I heard it from are unreliable and prone to half truths. Prone to lie their asses off, you mean. *Care to give me a name about who you heard it from? Honestly? I can't remember. It was ten years ago. Theoretically, I still have the data on a hard drive backup, but It's not something I have ready access too. Of course not. *Probably drunk, anyway. *No surprise they are prone to lying, though. *They know you. They are prone to lying because that's what they do. I'm just used to it and I adjust my level of trust appropriately *On the other hand, your sentences here are kind of short. Are you sure people didn't ask you to leave because of your "mother" rants. *Are you sure you didn't accuse them of violating the traditions? Not in an AA meeting. *Though I frequently do point out where fundamentalists violate the traditions. *I love calling bull**** on assholes. Forgive me if I'm being obtuse here, but Fundamentalist Xtians or Fundamentalist AA-ers? I don't do AA, so I don't know as much about it as I might. As I said, outright lie. *Busted, freak. *And you make excuses for being busted lying. *Typical It's not lying if you add "reportedly." Journalism 101. In fact, you can erode public confidence in an assertion by announcing it as "reportedly." Speaks to the cynicism of the audience. At any rate, it was deliberately honest of me to introduce the accusation with a nod to the dubiousness of the source. I have been banned from: nothing. You are banned from my prescence, for damn sure. *Ain't got the balls. Why are you interested in my balls? That doesn't seem wholesome. Typical remark of a coward without balls. *How pathetic. Typical remark of someone with an unwholesome fixation on my testicles. How unwholesome. Of course that's not really fair because I haven't attempted to join any of your social circles, and I'll bet I'm really missing out, but I'm kinda busy with my own pathetic life, so there you have it. You cannot join any of my social circles, dumb****. *Demands qualities of character you do not have, you pathetic loser. Oh Please! Come on, you used to like me. Let me be one of the cool kids. Never liked you, and never trusted you. *Turned out I was right, too. Anyway, you can't be one of the cool kids. *You can hang out with fellow freaks and try and be cool. Yeah. No one here trusts me. And they shouldn't, really, I mean as far as they really might, because for all they know, I'm just some guy on the internets, but trust is scalable quantity. Some people here, I would trust as far as I could throw them. Some people I would trust as far as I could throw a 59 Cadillac. Some people are too stupid to trust. Other people I would just trust. I ain't naming names. Except to say that I would totally die for Horvath on account of he is Beowulf. But, you know, we're not in high school anymore. "Cool" isn't really anything to anyone anymore. I'm hurt that you say you never liked me. That was a mean girl thing to say. You better have a matching designer outfit on. Best you can do. *Find some sort of respect from people as loathesome as you do, because no decent person will have anything to do with you once they figure out who you are. That's why we have kids. They're almost as dumb as dogs, except you can teach them to feed themselves. And more importantly you can teach them not to sit on the living room carpet licking their own genitalia when company comes over. I wish my parents had taught me this. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
In article
, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon wrote: You would make a great character for a novel. And we could call this character "Ignatius Reilly." |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
In article
, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon wrote: And more importantly you can teach them not to sit on the living room carpet licking their own genitalia when company comes over. I wish my parents had taught me this. Man, that so so awful and embarrassing! So, uh, how'd you get there? Yoga? Gymnastics? I'm, uh... writing a paper. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
On Jan 3, 1:23*am, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article , *Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon *wrote: You would make a great character for a novel. And we could call this character "Ignatius Reilly." You are too funny. I'm waiting for Scott to find employment selling hot dogs. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Thank You RSA
In article
, Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon wrote: On Jan 3, 1:23*am, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *Three Buddha and His Inflatable Dream of Bacon *wrote: You would make a great character for a novel. And we could call this character "Ignatius Reilly." You are too funny. I'm waiting for Scott to find employment selling hot dogs. Or work in a pants factory. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|