If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 16:51:32 -0800, scottabe
wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/27/03 4:26 PM: On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:07:28 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/25/03 5:21 PM: On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:16:26 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/24/03 1:32 PM: snip Remember, so far as Scott is concerned, two wrongs *do* make a right. Remember, as far as Alex Heney is concerned, reality is highly suspect. Readers can make up their own minds who has a better grasp on reality. Any reader who klnows the truth thinks you are a pathological liar with no grasp on reality. Like I said. They can make up their own minds who has a better grasp of reality. I think your response may have helped them decide. Clue time, wacko. Anyone who has any grasp on reality thinks you're nucking futs. I doubt it. Anyone? Apart from Scott. People may think I am nuts for trying to respond rationally to you. But not for what I have said. He considers that if you do something to him, it is quite fair and reasonable for him to do it back. Really? I missed the part where I threatened his life or falsely accused him or anyone else of molesting children, wacko. That is unsurprising, since there was no such part. That's what you just said, you sick ****. Where? You are insane. In other words, even you cannot find anything which might be taken to mean what you claim I have said, so you just resort to your standard taunt. And how on earth can you say it is what I just said, after saying you had missed it? You snipped it, wacko. Liar. I didn't snip anything. As anybody reading this thread will know. And as Google can easily prove. You missed it because I DIDN'T SAY IT. Bull****. You accused me of doing what your fellow criminals do. Period. Liar. Period. If you can find ANYTHING in what I said that could conceivably be taken as saying you have threatened anyone's life, or falsely accused anyone of molesting children, then you really do need some basic lessons in understanding plain English. You need some basic lessons in requiring it. In other words, once again, you cannot find anything which could mean that, but since you have decided (wrongly) that I did, that means I cannot have written it properly. You are simply wrong. I have never suggested in any way that you have done those things. Bull****. You have repeatedly accused me of things I have never done. Liar. I have NEVER, as far as I can recall, accused you of doing anything you have not said yourself you have done. So if I have ever accused you of doing anything you haven't, then you have lied about what you have done. What is said was that you have SAID it is OK to do back to others what they have done to you. That does NOT mean you have actually DONE any of those things, and it most certainly does NOT mean you have done ALL of them. Seeing as you continue to support those who do those things, and only give me and Bert ****, obviously YOU believe they have a right to commit crimes. Fair is fair, right? Nope. I do not believe anyone has a right to commit crimes. But I also believe it is up to those against whom the crimes are committed to take action over them. And I do not only give you ****, but it is too much trouble to keep on giving people **** over things that happened months or years ago. I also simply did not see many of the accusations you complain about because I have most of those people in my killfiles. As it happens, you have obviously done SOME of the things that have been done to you, as in this instance, where you are accusing Horvath of being in Jail just because he hasn't posted for a few days. More like a month. Read the posts. I can't be bothered. I'll take your word for it. There was a Horvath in jail for indecent exposure in NW Ohio during that time. Since he ain't got the balls to provide a verifiable first name, I assume it is him until he proves differently. And I have no problem with you responding in that way. I actually agree that is fair. Anything I do to that asshole is fair. That depends what "anything" is. Certainly everything I have seen you do is fair. There are still things you *could* do, but almost certainly * won't* do, that would not be fair. It is simple FACT that you have stated on numerous occasions in the past that turnaround is fair game. It is a simple FACT that I have no acted like you and your sick friends, nor have I done what you have done. It is a FACT that you are a pathological liar. You have certainly done a lot more than I personally have. Bull****. You've lied your sick ass off and made false accusations, unlike me. Liar. And as for my "sick friends", I don't know who you are talking about. There are only three people who have ever posted on this newsgroup I have even met, and that was once only, for one evening, and one of them is now dead. The only two people I know are dead from here are pathological liars and terrorists. Your friends. Nope. One of them I never met. the other, I met once, for one evening, and every decent person who met him thinks he was a very good man. I wouldn't presume to call him a friend, based on the little contact I had with him. That does not mean you will do *everything* that has been done to you. Just that you think (and many would agree) that it is fair for you to do so. You are insane. Get help. Do you mean that there is something in the previous paragraph you disagree with? You are insane. Get help. I'll take that as a no, then. If you think there is anything ion that paragraph which could conceivably lead ANYONE who has the slightest grasp on reality to think I am insane, then you are probably way beyond help. You are insane. Get help. I'll take that as meaning you cannot find anything to support your ridiculous accusation then. Many people would agree with him there. Where they would disagree is that he takes it further, and thinks it is also fair and reasonable to do it to people who were not involved, just because they are friends or relatives of the ones who did it to him. You truly are insane, Heney. You just accused me of what you sick ****s do, what I have refrained from doing. You are a vile, demented, indecent lying asshole. Please explain exactly what your deluded mind thinks I have accused you of here. What you just said, you sick ****. No. Pleas point out EXACTLY which words of mine you think were accusing you of any of these things. Just saying "what you just said" is meaningless. You are insane. Get help. OK. Since I didn't use those words, I'll assume that means you cannot find any such words again. I know, and anybody else reading this knows, that I have made no such accusations. I'm reading it. You lie. Get help. Liar. you have still entirely failed to point out where I have made any such accusations. And I have not snipped ANYTHING from this thread. If you could point out which words you think were making such accusations, perhaps the misunderstanding could be cleared up. No misunderstanding. You are a deranged pathological liar who continues his pattern of lies....while never holding his fellow terrorists liable. Liar. And if there was no misunderstanding, then you KNOW that I did not say the things you accuse me of. If you think I did, then there must be a misunderstanding, since I KNOW I said no such thing, and therefore you have misinterpreted something I said. Again, it is simple, verifiable fact that you have stated in this newsgroup that you think it fair to go after the friends of people who have gone after you and your friends, regardless of whether those people had anything to do with it. This was part of your "fair is fair" campaign. Fair is fair. You don't mind if I falsely accuse you of molesting children in your hometown newsgroup, do you. Of course I would. If I had a "hometown" newsgroup. You just accused me of doing so, might as well be guilty of it. Liar. You are insane. I don't think so. I have NEVER accused you of molesting children. Nor would I ever do so. As far as I know, you have never molested any children, and I have always thought, and have several times said, that I think it is vile to accuse anyone of doing so, unless they have actually been convicted of a crime involving such. Then why are you civil with those who do it, wacko? I'm not, generally. But then what you consider to be such an accusation is just plain ridiculous. What I consider to be such an accusation is somebody actually stating that you have done those things. As far as I am aware, this does not apply to you, and I think all such accusations deserve condemnation. A little moral lesson. You don't meet people who falsely accuse people of molesting children. You shun them. Clue time, wacko. I never have met anyone who has made any such accusation. Now please retract YOUR vile lie that I have accused you of such. Unless, again, you can point out the EXACT words which you think could be construed as an accusation that you have done such vile deeds. Kiss my ass, you insane nutcase. I don't see any point in continuing this, since you jut make up insane lies about what I have posted, when everyone can see that I have posted no such things. Trying to have a rational conversation with you is like trying to catch the ocean in a sieve. -- Alex Heney, Global Villager If at first you don't succeed, work for Microsoft. To reply by email, my address is aDOTjDOTheneyATbtinternetDOTcom |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
"Scottabe" wrote in message m... scottabe wrote in message news:BC136913.C80A% Kiss my ass, you insane nutcase. Say Scott, where does Alex accuse you of all the things that you say he does? I've been reading this group a long time and I have never seen him make accusations of child molestation. In fact, he does quite the opposite. You want people to speak up against those practices and he is the only one I see doing that on a regular basis, yet you constantly make false accusations against him anyway. What gives? I would think you would cut him some slack since he is constantaly standing up for you. He says he won't answer questions if he doesn't have a certain information about the asker. When I ask the question, he has all that information about me, he *still* won't answer. Not that it's a surprise to anyone. You can use that for an example of his ethics. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
in article , pigo at
wrote on 12/28/03 6:29 PM: "Scottabe" wrote in message m... scottabe wrote in message news:BC136913.C80A% Kiss my ass, you insane nutcase. Say Scott, where does Alex accuse you of all the things that you say he does? I've been reading this group a long time and I have never seen him make accusations of child molestation. In fact, he does quite the opposite. You want people to speak up against those practices and he is the only one I see doing that on a regular basis, yet you constantly make false accusations against him anyway. What gives? I would think you would cut him some slack since he is constantaly standing up for you. He says he won't answer questions if he doesn't have a certain information about the asker. Wrong again, asshole. When I ask the question, he has all that information about me, he *still* won't answer. Not that it's a surprise to anyone. You can use that for an example of his ethics. Yeah. I don't play sick games with a criminal like Bob Thompson who fronts for his anonymous buddies. I am happy to answer all the questions. I merely require verifiable names and addresses of all anonymous terrorists. Simple, really. The mere fact that I know Bob Thompson merely means one of many is out of the closet. You can take this insane logic as an example of Bob Thompson's ethics. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
I'm not even going to bother, except for one observation: Alex Heney never
takes his fellow liars and terrorists to task. He only obsesses over Bert and me. So many wackos, so much filth, and silence from Alex Heney, wack job. in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/28/03 5:56 PM: On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 16:51:32 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/27/03 4:26 PM: On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:07:28 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/25/03 5:21 PM: On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:16:26 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/24/03 1:32 PM: snip Remember, so far as Scott is concerned, two wrongs *do* make a right. Remember, as far as Alex Heney is concerned, reality is highly suspect. Readers can make up their own minds who has a better grasp on reality. Any reader who klnows the truth thinks you are a pathological liar with no grasp on reality. Like I said. They can make up their own minds who has a better grasp of reality. I think your response may have helped them decide. Clue time, wacko. Anyone who has any grasp on reality thinks you're nucking futs. I doubt it. Anyone? Apart from Scott. People may think I am nuts for trying to respond rationally to you. But not for what I have said. He considers that if you do something to him, it is quite fair and reasonable for him to do it back. Really? I missed the part where I threatened his life or falsely accused him or anyone else of molesting children, wacko. That is unsurprising, since there was no such part. That's what you just said, you sick ****. Where? You are insane. In other words, even you cannot find anything which might be taken to mean what you claim I have said, so you just resort to your standard taunt. And how on earth can you say it is what I just said, after saying you had missed it? You snipped it, wacko. Liar. I didn't snip anything. As anybody reading this thread will know. And as Google can easily prove. You missed it because I DIDN'T SAY IT. Bull****. You accused me of doing what your fellow criminals do. Period. Liar. Period. If you can find ANYTHING in what I said that could conceivably be taken as saying you have threatened anyone's life, or falsely accused anyone of molesting children, then you really do need some basic lessons in understanding plain English. You need some basic lessons in requiring it. In other words, once again, you cannot find anything which could mean that, but since you have decided (wrongly) that I did, that means I cannot have written it properly. You are simply wrong. I have never suggested in any way that you have done those things. Bull****. You have repeatedly accused me of things I have never done. Liar. I have NEVER, as far as I can recall, accused you of doing anything you have not said yourself you have done. So if I have ever accused you of doing anything you haven't, then you have lied about what you have done. What is said was that you have SAID it is OK to do back to others what they have done to you. That does NOT mean you have actually DONE any of those things, and it most certainly does NOT mean you have done ALL of them. Seeing as you continue to support those who do those things, and only give me and Bert ****, obviously YOU believe they have a right to commit crimes. Fair is fair, right? Nope. I do not believe anyone has a right to commit crimes. But I also believe it is up to those against whom the crimes are committed to take action over them. And I do not only give you ****, but it is too much trouble to keep on giving people **** over things that happened months or years ago. I also simply did not see many of the accusations you complain about because I have most of those people in my killfiles. As it happens, you have obviously done SOME of the things that have been done to you, as in this instance, where you are accusing Horvath of being in Jail just because he hasn't posted for a few days. More like a month. Read the posts. I can't be bothered. I'll take your word for it. There was a Horvath in jail for indecent exposure in NW Ohio during that time. Since he ain't got the balls to provide a verifiable first name, I assume it is him until he proves differently. And I have no problem with you responding in that way. I actually agree that is fair. Anything I do to that asshole is fair. That depends what "anything" is. Certainly everything I have seen you do is fair. There are still things you *could* do, but almost certainly * won't* do, that would not be fair. It is simple FACT that you have stated on numerous occasions in the past that turnaround is fair game. It is a simple FACT that I have no acted like you and your sick friends, nor have I done what you have done. It is a FACT that you are a pathological liar. You have certainly done a lot more than I personally have. Bull****. You've lied your sick ass off and made false accusations, unlike me. Liar. And as for my "sick friends", I don't know who you are talking about. There are only three people who have ever posted on this newsgroup I have even met, and that was once only, for one evening, and one of them is now dead. The only two people I know are dead from here are pathological liars and terrorists. Your friends. Nope. One of them I never met. the other, I met once, for one evening, and every decent person who met him thinks he was a very good man. I wouldn't presume to call him a friend, based on the little contact I had with him. That does not mean you will do *everything* that has been done to you. Just that you think (and many would agree) that it is fair for you to do so. You are insane. Get help. Do you mean that there is something in the previous paragraph you disagree with? You are insane. Get help. I'll take that as a no, then. If you think there is anything ion that paragraph which could conceivably lead ANYONE who has the slightest grasp on reality to think I am insane, then you are probably way beyond help. You are insane. Get help. I'll take that as meaning you cannot find anything to support your ridiculous accusation then. Many people would agree with him there. Where they would disagree is that he takes it further, and thinks it is also fair and reasonable to do it to people who were not involved, just because they are friends or relatives of the ones who did it to him. You truly are insane, Heney. You just accused me of what you sick ****s do, what I have refrained from doing. You are a vile, demented, indecent lying asshole. Please explain exactly what your deluded mind thinks I have accused you of here. What you just said, you sick ****. No. Pleas point out EXACTLY which words of mine you think were accusing you of any of these things. Just saying "what you just said" is meaningless. You are insane. Get help. OK. Since I didn't use those words, I'll assume that means you cannot find any such words again. I know, and anybody else reading this knows, that I have made no such accusations. I'm reading it. You lie. Get help. Liar. you have still entirely failed to point out where I have made any such accusations. And I have not snipped ANYTHING from this thread. If you could point out which words you think were making such accusations, perhaps the misunderstanding could be cleared up. No misunderstanding. You are a deranged pathological liar who continues his pattern of lies....while never holding his fellow terrorists liable. Liar. And if there was no misunderstanding, then you KNOW that I did not say the things you accuse me of. If you think I did, then there must be a misunderstanding, since I KNOW I said no such thing, and therefore you have misinterpreted something I said. Again, it is simple, verifiable fact that you have stated in this newsgroup that you think it fair to go after the friends of people who have gone after you and your friends, regardless of whether those people had anything to do with it. This was part of your "fair is fair" campaign. Fair is fair. You don't mind if I falsely accuse you of molesting children in your hometown newsgroup, do you. Of course I would. If I had a "hometown" newsgroup. You just accused me of doing so, might as well be guilty of it. Liar. You are insane. I don't think so. I have NEVER accused you of molesting children. Nor would I ever do so. As far as I know, you have never molested any children, and I have always thought, and have several times said, that I think it is vile to accuse anyone of doing so, unless they have actually been convicted of a crime involving such. Then why are you civil with those who do it, wacko? I'm not, generally. But then what you consider to be such an accusation is just plain ridiculous. What I consider to be such an accusation is somebody actually stating that you have done those things. As far as I am aware, this does not apply to you, and I think all such accusations deserve condemnation. A little moral lesson. You don't meet people who falsely accuse people of molesting children. You shun them. Clue time, wacko. I never have met anyone who has made any such accusation. Now please retract YOUR vile lie that I have accused you of such. Unless, again, you can point out the EXACT words which you think could be construed as an accusation that you have done such vile deeds. Kiss my ass, you insane nutcase. I don't see any point in continuing this, since you jut make up insane lies about what I have posted, when everyone can see that I have posted no such things. Trying to have a rational conversation with you is like trying to catch the ocean in a sieve. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
In message , Scottabe
writes Say Scott, where does Alex accuse you of all the things that you say he does? I've been reading this group a long time and I have never seen him make accusations of child molestation. In fact, he does quite the opposite. You want people to speak up against those practices and he is the only one I see doing that on a regular basis, yet you constantly make false accusations against him anyway. What gives? I would think you would cut him some slack since he is constantaly standing up for you. Is it possible that you might have misunderstood Scott's position? If he's the *only* decent ethical person, it goes without saying that nobody else can be decent and ethical, so they must all be villains of some sort. This could be seen as a case of words speaking louder than actions. [NB this post aims only to promote understanding of the position: it is not a vote for or against.] -- Sue ]8( |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
scottabe
"Alex Heney" wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:07:28 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/25/03 5:21 PM: On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:16:26 -0800, scottabe wrote: in article , Alex Heney at wrote on 12/24/03 1:32 PM: snip Remember, so far as Scott is concerned, two wrongs *do* make a right. Remember, as far as Alex Heney is concerned, reality is highly suspect. Readers can make up their own minds who has a better grasp on reality. Any reader who klnows the truth thinks you are a pathological liar with no grasp on reality. Like I said. They can make up their own minds who has a better grasp of reality. I think your response may have helped them decide. Yup, they can see your lies and wild accusations. Not that long ago, you e-mailed me some harassing defamatory e-mail making wild accusations that I had signed you up for over 60 e-mail lists. You later had to admit that I had done no such thing. In the meantime, you posted here the lie that you hadn't sent me another harassing e-mail, after I e-mailed you back saying your e-mails were unwelcome. You claimed that you "only" replied to acknowledge my e-mail and tell me why your e-mail came from a disguised e-mail address. You lied, of course. In that e-mail you went on at great length reiterating your wild and groundless accusations. Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's the matter with you idiots?? | TS | Alpine Skiing | 267 | November 26th 03 03:47 AM |
King William I of America. | Inger Skramstad Jørstad | Alpine Skiing | 156 | November 16th 03 01:21 AM |
Park City Lift Tickets | Richard and Barbara | Alpine Skiing | 97 | November 15th 03 05:10 AM |
Would someone please... | ant | Alpine Skiing | 50 | October 25th 03 08:12 PM |
Silence.... | Jay Pique | Alpine Skiing | 10 | August 21st 03 05:54 AM |