Would somebody please take Abraham up on his offer

in article , Olaf Timandahaff at
wrote on 7/16/03 7:22 PM:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:46:39 -0700, "Richard Henry"
wrote:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:

...
I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that
you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the
plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego
RM-fraud
victim.

I would think that if you were concerned about people who were falsely
accused, you would have condemned your buddies who have falsely accused me
on thousands of occasions. But never a peep from you. Never a word. As
I
was saying about a dishonest, manipulative liar?
If you were being honest about it, you would have mentioned the hundreds
of
thousands of DOCUMENTED cases of recovered memory being verified by real,
hard evidence. But no. Like the child molesters, you use the phrase
"RM-fraud".

That's because I cited three cases of RM-fraud. You are now invited to cite
a hundred thousand genuine documented RM cases.

By the way, I looked up a few genuine recovered memory sites. The serious
ones require more proof than just the purported victim's word, or that of
his therapist. Too easily subject to abuse, as my three little examples
show. They need some corroborating physical evidence, a confession by the
alleged perpetrator, or confirmation by an otherwise disinterested third
party. Does you case have any of those?

Like the child molesters, you take a few cases out of context and ignore
the
overwhelming reality of the vast majority of the cases.
Like the child molesters, you lie and defame and stalk.
Like the child molesters, you taunt molestation victims and mock
molestation
victims, and support those who do.

I'm afraid I don't know what the child molesters do.



You apparently aren't a big fan of the "circular reasoning" school of
NG posting.

You apparently aren't a big fan of ethics, morals, or decency.

in article , BrritSki at wrote
on 7/17/03 7:13 AM:

Richard Henry wrote:

I guess Mr. Akiki could do whatever he wants. After his acquittal, he sued
San Diego County, his church, and the therapist and won several million
dollars. I thought his case would raise some sympathy in Scott - false
accusations of child molestation, unusual appearance, etc,

Yes, I thought there were some similarities until I read that Mr.
Akiki's IQ was 79 which was much too high. Now if that had been a waist
measurement....

A confessed perjurer once again makes jokes about molesting children.

in article , Armin at
wrote on 7/17/03 4:26 PM:

scottabe wrote:
I am **** on Scott's shoe.

Don't be so hard on yourself.

Anytime, asshole.

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:18:39 -0700, scottabe
wrote:

in article , Olaf Timandahaff at
wrote on 7/16/03 7:22 PM:

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:46:39 -0700, "Richard Henry"
wrote:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:

...
I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that
you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the
plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego
RM-fraud
victim.

I would think that if you were concerned about people who were falsely
accused, you would have condemned your buddies who have falsely accused me
on thousands of occasions. But never a peep from you. Never a word. As
I
was saying about a dishonest, manipulative liar?
If you were being honest about it, you would have mentioned the hundreds
of
thousands of DOCUMENTED cases of recovered memory being verified by real,
hard evidence. But no. Like the child molesters, you use the phrase
"RM-fraud".

That's because I cited three cases of RM-fraud. You are now invited to cite
a hundred thousand genuine documented RM cases.

By the way, I looked up a few genuine recovered memory sites. The serious
ones require more proof than just the purported victim's word, or that of
his therapist. Too easily subject to abuse, as my three little examples
show. They need some corroborating physical evidence, a confession by the
alleged perpetrator, or confirmation by an otherwise disinterested third
party. Does you case have any of those?

Like the child molesters, you take a few cases out of context and ignore
the
overwhelming reality of the vast majority of the cases.
Like the child molesters, you lie and defame and stalk.
Like the child molesters, you taunt molestation victims and mock
molestation
victims, and support those who do.

I'm afraid I don't know what the child molesters do.



You apparently aren't a big fan of the "circular reasoning" school of
NG posting.

You apparently aren't a big fan of ethics, morals, or decency.

I am too.

It is definately not ethical, moral or decent to disrupt this NG for
5+ years, with ranting, raving and circular reasoning.
This means that I am decent ethical and moral and you are not.
You would understand these truths if you were.
I truly hope you find some ethics, morals & decency before another
decade passes. I am an ethical, patient, moral person besides being a
good & decent man , I will wait.



OT

scottabe wrote in message
...
in article hmxRa.8968$Bp2.555@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/17/03 6:18 AM:

And I find S's threats to complain to my youth sports organization
ironically amusing. The president of the club (the one to whom he would
logically make a complaint) is a lawyer from whom I have sought informal
advise about newsgroup libel. As a result, he already knows some
details of
the case. His advice was that there was little that could be done until
there was some actual attempt to damage me, such as by lodging a false
complaint.

More lies, more evasion, more psychopathic manipulations.
What a liar!

How perceptive! There actually is one false statement in the paragraph
above. The rest of the paragraph is quite true.

Can you find the lie?

Anytime you want to sue me, asshole, go for it. I'd LOVE to get your sick
psychopathic ass in front of a jury. In fact, if you would care to give
me
a verifiable name and address, I'll make sure to try and give you enough
cause.

Usually, cases of this type do not involve a jury. But you know that
already.

Just called your bluff, asshole. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA

My name, address, occupation, and youth sports affiliation are all public
information. But you know that already.

in article fe3Sa.9356$Bp2.1940@fed1read07, Richard Henry at
wrote on 7/18/03 8:50 PM:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article hmxRa.8968$Bp2.555@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/17/03 6:18 AM:

And I find S's threats to complain to my youth sports organization
ironically amusing. The president of the club (the one to whom he would
logically make a complaint) is a lawyer from whom I have sought informal
advise about newsgroup libel. As a result, he already knows some
details of
the case. His advice was that there was little that could be done until
there was some actual attempt to damage me, such as by lodging a false
complaint.

More lies, more evasion, more psychopathic manipulations.
What a liar!

How perceptive! There actually is one false statement in the paragraph
above. The rest of the paragraph is quite true.

Can you find the lie?

Everything you write.
Just another example of a psychopath laughing about he manipulates the
truth.
Names. Adresses. Liar.

Anytime you want to sue me, asshole, go for it. I'd LOVE to get your sick
psychopathic ass in front of a jury. In fact, if you would care to give
me
a verifiable name and address, I'll make sure to try and give you enough
cause.

Usually, cases of this type do not involve a jury. But you know that
already.

Sue me.

Just called your bluff, asshole. BWHAHAHAHAHAHA

My name, address, occupation, and youth sports affiliation are all public
information. But you know that already.

Another lie. How transparent can this psychopath get? If it is such common
knowledge, post it. Just like you posted MY name and home address in my
hometown newsgroup encouraging nutcases to do violence. Like the cowardly
psychopath you are.

scottabe wrote in message
...
in article , Alan Baker at
wrote on 7/18/03 10:53 PM:

You still want to claim they bought out another dating service?

Yep.
You still want to claim I molest children?

Wait a minute, there. I don't remember Alan ever accusing you of molesting
children. I object to your false accusation of false accusations of child
molestation.

In article ,
scottabe wrote:

Go back to Auschwitz, you belong there.

What makes you think Olaf is Jewish? Regardless, that is an awful thing
to say and you should apologize. That kind of blatant antisemitism
doesn't belong here or anywhere.

You suck.

Dave

In message , Vern93
writes
In article ,
scottabe wrote:

Go back to Auschwitz, you belong there.

What makes you think Olaf is Jewish? Regardless, that is an awful thing
to say and you should apologize. That kind of blatant antisemitism
doesn't belong here or anywhere.

It's not antisemitic just to mention Auschwitz; it's the home of a
museum recording some atrocities (no longer the world's worst) that took
place before any of us was born. The victims were not exclusively
Jewish.
Logically, the remark would mean Olaf should educate himself about the
history of intolerance - whether it's justified would still be open to
discus^H^H^H argument, of course.
--
Sue ]|(

Hey Scooter,

Nice to see that after all this time there are still a crowd of people
that want to kick your obese ass.

Unfortunately over time you have lost all your creativity and now can
just spew.

I guess it just proves that insanity is a progressive disease if left
untreated.

Nice to know you are loved by so many.

Your pal,

Tina