Would somebody please take Abraham up on his offer

The observer will note that this sick, pathological liar snipped my post,
ommitting the area in which he said his friends, boss, and administrator of
the league in which he coaches CHILDREN know about his participation on rsa
and have read what he wrote.
He was challenged to prove the lie.
He ignores it.
That's what a psychopath does.
In reality, he posts from anonymity and continues to lie and mislead those
around him. Do you want someone who defends child molesters working with
children? Doens't ANYONE here have a conscience? Doesn't ANYONE here know
where he works, where he lives, so we can protect children from this
supporter of child molesters?

in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at
wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article A43Ra.7618$Bp2.4816@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 7:51 PM:

My internet habits are coffee-room and
practice-field topics of conversation on a regular basis (as in "You
still
arguing with that fat skier?").

Bull****. Prove it. Let me contact the people who trust you with their
children and show them how you defend child molesters.

I have looked over my postings of the last few days, and I can't find any
posts where I even mention real child molesters. Instead, I was defending
those _falsely accused_ of being child molesters. I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego RM-fraud
victim.

Here a few nuggets gleaned from a google search on "Dale Akiki":

From http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witch...ases/akiki.htm (all from LA
Times reports on the case)

Some children said Akiki brought an elephant and a giraffe
to class, killing them both as a way of warning his pupils not
to reveal his crimes.
...
Akiki said he had spent a lifetime trying to overcome the
stigma of his odd appearance, which he admitted frightens
children and adults.
...
For two years Dale Akiki has languished in San
Diego County Jail, unjustly accused, say his scores of
supporters, because of his odd appearance and a witch hunt by
the district attorney.
...
Akiki has a disfigured head
...
he has an IQ of 79.

from http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_akiki.htm

There are allegations that the grandfather of some of the alleged victims is
a prominent citizen of San Diego who had financially supported the District
Attorney, Ed. Miller. After a alleged personal meeting with Miller, the case
was reassigned to Deputy District Attorney Mary Avery who brought charges
against Akiki.
...
During an extensive series of therapy sessions, the children began to tell
stories of Akiki mutilating and/or killing a baby, an elephant, [!] a
giraffe and rabbits in their presence. They also said that he had kidnapped
them, taken them in his car, raped them, dunked them in feces-filled
toilets, sodomized them with curling irons and toy firetruck ladders, forced
them to play naked sex games, hung them upside down, threatened them with
guns and knives, urinated on them, and assaulted them with blood torture
rituals. All of this abuse allegedly occurred during a series of 90 minute
Sunday school classes.
...
Due to a genetic defects, Dale is developmentally handicapped, his chest is
concave, and his head is unusually large.
...
Akiki spent 30 months behind bars waiting for a trial. After a 7 month
trial, the jury deliberated for 7 hours and acquitted him of 35 charges
involving dozens of children. The jury lashed out at the prosecutors for
bringing the case to trial in spite of the complete lack of physical
evidence. It was the longest and most expensive trial in San Diego history.
Six months later, District Attorney Ed Miller was turned out of office after
receiving only 11% of the popular vote.

in article , lal_truckee at
wrote on 7/16/03 9:18 AM:

Richard Henry wrote:


Does he ski?

No surprise that a fellow psychpath and pathological liar ignores Richard
Henry defending and supporting child molesters.
He know him. He knows where he lives. And this sick asshole could care
less that Richard Henry supports child molesters.

Hey scooter,

your Pal,

Tina


lal_truckee wrote in message ...
Richard Henry wrote:


Does he ski?

scottabe wrote in message
...
in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:

...
I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that
you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the
plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego
RM-fraud
victim.

I would think that if you were concerned about people who were falsely
accused, you would have condemned your buddies who have falsely accused me
on thousands of occasions. But never a peep from you. Never a word. As
I
was saying about a dishonest, manipulative liar?
If you were being honest about it, you would have mentioned the hundreds
of
thousands of DOCUMENTED cases of recovered memory being verified by real,
hard evidence. But no. Like the child molesters, you use the phrase
"RM-fraud".

That's because I cited three cases of RM-fraud. You are now invited to cite
a hundred thousand genuine documented RM cases.

By the way, I looked up a few genuine recovered memory sites. The serious
ones require more proof than just the purported victim's word, or that of
his therapist. Too easily subject to abuse, as my three little examples
show. They need some corroborating physical evidence, a confession by the
alleged perpetrator, or confirmation by an otherwise disinterested third
party. Does you case have any of those?

Like the child molesters, you take a few cases out of context and ignore
the
overwhelming reality of the vast majority of the cases.
Like the child molesters, you lie and defame and stalk.
Like the child molesters, you taunt molestation victims and mock
molestation
victims, and support those who do.

I'm afraid I don't know what the child molesters do.

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:46:39 -0700, "Richard Henry"
wrote:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:

...
I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that
you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the
plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego
RM-fraud
victim.

I would think that if you were concerned about people who were falsely
accused, you would have condemned your buddies who have falsely accused me
on thousands of occasions. But never a peep from you. Never a word. As
I
was saying about a dishonest, manipulative liar?
If you were being honest about it, you would have mentioned the hundreds
of
thousands of DOCUMENTED cases of recovered memory being verified by real,
hard evidence. But no. Like the child molesters, you use the phrase
"RM-fraud".

That's because I cited three cases of RM-fraud. You are now invited to cite
a hundred thousand genuine documented RM cases.

By the way, I looked up a few genuine recovered memory sites. The serious
ones require more proof than just the purported victim's word, or that of
his therapist. Too easily subject to abuse, as my three little examples
show. They need some corroborating physical evidence, a confession by the
alleged perpetrator, or confirmation by an otherwise disinterested third
party. Does you case have any of those?

Like the child molesters, you take a few cases out of context and ignore
the
overwhelming reality of the vast majority of the cases.
Like the child molesters, you lie and defame and stalk.
Like the child molesters, you taunt molestation victims and mock
molestation
victims, and support those who do.

I'm afraid I don't know what the child molesters do.



You apparently aren't a big fan of the "circular reasoning" school of
NG posting.

OT

"I'll sleep when I'm dead"

W. Zevon

Richard Henry wrote:
lal_truckee wrote in message
...

Richard Henry wrote:

Does he ski?



Who he? Me he? Him he?
CLIP


Dale Akiki - does he ski? Elsewise, why the essay about him?

BTW - he COULD ski, even with the described difficulties - see:
http://www.dalebootusa.com/gif/test/feet_small.gif

Richard Henry wrote:

I guess Mr. Akiki could do whatever he wants. After his acquittal, he sued
San Diego County, his church, and the therapist and won several million
dollars. I thought his case would raise some sympathy in Scott - false
accusations of child molestation, unusual appearance, etc,

Yes, I thought there were some similarities until I read that Mr.
Akiki's IQ was 79 which was much too high. Now if that had been a waist
measurement....

scottabe wrote:
I am **** on Scott's shoe.

Don't be so hard on yourself.

Armin

in article , tina at
wrote on 7/16/03 4:02 PM:

Hey scooter,

your Pal,

Tina


lal_truckee wrote in message
...
Richard Henry wrote:


Does he ski?
Hey, Tina?
Wanna tell me again how I used the power of being a leader of the Cult of
Vail to abuse and exploit innocent young females?
Get any therapy since the last time you stalked me?

in article KlmRa.8578$Bp2.7005@fed1read07, Richard Henry at
wrote on 7/16/03 5:46 PM:


scottabe wrote in message
...
in article Wq6Ra.7940$Bp2.1753@fed1read07, Richard Henry at

wrote on 7/15/03 11:39 PM:

...
I would think that since
the central theme of your current on-line existence is your claim that
you
yourself have been so falsely accused, you would be sensitive to the
plight
of others in that situation, especially Dale Akiki, the San Diego
RM-fraud
victim.

I would think that if you were concerned about people who were falsely
accused, you would have condemned your buddies who have falsely accused me
on thousands of occasions. But never a peep from you. Never a word. As
I
was saying about a dishonest, manipulative liar?
If you were being honest about it, you would have mentioned the hundreds
of
thousands of DOCUMENTED cases of recovered memory being verified by real,
hard evidence. But no. Like the child molesters, you use the phrase
"RM-fraud".

That's because I cited three cases of RM-fraud. You are now invited to cite
a hundred thousand genuine documented RM cases.

Plenty of them out there, friend of baby rapers. Go cite them yourself. In
the meantime, addresses and names of your boss and the supervisor of the
youth league you coach in, stalker.

By the way, I looked up a few genuine recovered memory sites. The serious
ones require more proof than just the purported victim's word, or that of
his therapist. Too easily subject to abuse, as my three little examples
show. They need some corroborating physical evidence, a confession by the
alleged perpetrator, or confirmation by an otherwise disinterested third
party. Does you case have any of those?

Hundreds of thousands of such cases, including mine. As you well know.

Like the child molesters, you take a few cases out of context and ignore
the
overwhelming reality of the vast majority of the cases.
Like the child molesters, you lie and defame and stalk.
Like the child molesters, you taunt molestation victims and mock
molestation
victims, and support those who do.

I'm afraid I don't know what the child molesters do.

For someone who sounds like a child molester......

BTW, once again, why have you failed to object to thousands of false
allegations against Bert and myself, but continue to defend child molesters?
Inquiring minds want to know why you are so choosy about who you defend.
Apparently, when you or one of your sick buddies make a false allegation,
you have no moral or ethical qualms about it. But you have no problem
spouting the child molester defense line.......