If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 26, 8:38 pm, Dave Cartman wrote:
taichiskiing Look, I don't know what you mean by "give your mutated ego a lick." Are you using "mutated" in the "to change" sense or in the "x-men" sense? "Give your mutated ego a lick"? That was saying you were lip-serving your mutated ego. And what is a "mutated ego"? A mutated ego is a reversed human psychic frequently used by lower/little knowledge to try to win an argument by twisting the facts or through shameless denials, in their mind of course, to present a fake image that they know better. Thank you for clearing that up. Initially it wasn't completely clear what you meant, because none of those words mean anything remotely like that. Dave You're welcome, I did say that you have a small English domain and narrowly defined vocabularies. |
Ads |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 7:57*am, Scottum wrote:
On May 26, 2:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 12:25*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 8:47*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote: On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. An hourly occurrence for you, I'm sure. As I was saying? What about your post about taking a gun to temple? * Sure did. *Do you want to mention the clear death threats, people threatening to shoot me, people claiming to have done drive by's? I'd love for you to provide references to them, yes. But you never will, will you? Here is a clue. *Somebody threatens to kill me, I take precautions. *I am more than capable of defending myself from the agression of rsa terrorists, as you well know. *Because if you didn't believe I could take you easier than stealing candy from a baby, you would have shown up at Copper. LOL Amazing how you freaks never mention your own death threats, then start whining to the cops when I tell you to bring it on, you pathetic pussy. What death threats, Scottie? I've never seen one. The only threat I've seen is you threatening me. That's not the only threat. *He's also threatened me, pigo, Richard, Ted, Dave, Ant, Hobbs and Yabahoobs and I'm sure there are others I've forgotten. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe his threats against me were just bully-posturing, such as when I pointed out that my complaint to SPD seemed to have stopped his written threats, he quickly wrote one. My main fear is that if someone were to actually meet him, he might feel trapped and act out irrationally. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 26, 8:31*pm, taichiskiing
wrote: On May 26, 3:48 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *taichiskiing wrote: On May 25, 5:03 pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *taichiskiing wrote: Not really, that was to say you are only operated in undergrad math; for post PhD program's view (more serious discussion on the fallacy of logic), read "The Problems of Philosophy" by Bertrand Russell; then again, what am I talking about, if you can read that book and understand what is said in there, we would not have this argument.. Nevertheless, for your reference. Bertrand Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" is not a book written for a "post PhD program." *It's in its 17th printing and is available for free online. *Ironically, one of Russell's goals in writing the book was to make philosophy more accessible to anyone. *It's taught as a core text in many undergraduate philosphy courses. That's quite true; nevertheless, that does confirm the fact that "The Problems of Philosophy" itself is a higher level knowledge. No it doesn't. *This is how you keep digging yourself into holes. Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy" is NOT book targeted at and appreciated only in "post PhD programs." No, I didn't say that "'The Problems of Philosophy' is a book targeted at and appreciated only in 'post PhD programs,'" but "The Problems of Philosophy" itself is a higher level knowledge," among other things. You are twisting facts to make your argument. So you are still in denial. Perhaps you could back your claims up with something besides verbosity and flawed reasoning. www.google.comisa good start. Dave Laughable, do you ever heed your own advise?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Having known a few Philosophy majors in my day, I would say that the problem of philophy is 'Do want fries with that?" |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 9:47*am, Richard Henry wrote:
I would put scott in the lost-cause ward as well. I even feel guilty sometimes about enabling his rants. sure I do- It didn't occur to me to conduct the research as an avenue for repair but as a subject of interest. It's so convoluted, such a prime example of projection, so bizarre in it's denial of the obvious. Toecheese is just bizarre. I can't even read it. I try sometimes but find myself have to read outloud and pronounce each word individually to try to make sense of it. And that just give me a headache and I just give up. So far using the intelligable parts, he has nothing to say anyway. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 9:51*am, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 27, 7:57*am, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 2:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 12:25*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 8:47*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote: On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. An hourly occurrence for you, I'm sure. As I was saying? What about your post about taking a gun to temple? * Sure did. *Do you want to mention the clear death threats, people threatening to shoot me, people claiming to have done drive by's? I'd love for you to provide references to them, yes. But you never will, will you? Here is a clue. *Somebody threatens to kill me, I take precautions. *I am more than capable of defending myself from the agression of rsa terrorists, as you well know. *Because if you didn't believe I could take you easier than stealing candy from a baby, you would have shown up at Copper. LOL Amazing how you freaks never mention your own death threats, then start whining to the cops when I tell you to bring it on, you pathetic pussy. What death threats, Scottie? I've never seen one. The only threat I've seen is you threatening me. That's not the only threat. *He's also threatened me, pigo, Richard, Ted, Dave, Ant, Hobbs and Yabahoobs and I'm sure there are others I've forgotten. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe his threats against me were just bully-posturing, such as when I pointed out that my complaint to SPD seemed to have stopped his written threats, he quickly wrote one. It's become apparent that *so far* that's true. But in a civilized society one is not supposed to be allowed to keep bullying and making _empty_ threats up to the point that he goes over the edge and carries one out. One has to extrapolate his "under any circumstances" threat to mean that anytime you walk down any street that someone could walk up behind you and hit you with a stick. And that that is his stated intention. We've had the discussion before about his "threatening behavior". And is in fact the basis for past restraining orders. My main fear is that if someone were to actually meet him, he might feel trapped and act out irrationally. Mine is more that he'd see someone and sneak up behind them. As long as you can mount a defense a big yogi like that should be containable. It would be the AIDS and hepititis that I'd worry about then! |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 9:31*am, pigo wrote:
On May 27, 9:51*am, Richard Henry wrote: On May 27, 7:57*am, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 2:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 12:25*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 8:47*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote: On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. An hourly occurrence for you, I'm sure. As I was saying? What about your post about taking a gun to temple? * Sure did. *Do you want to mention the clear death threats, people threatening to shoot me, people claiming to have done drive by's? I'd love for you to provide references to them, yes. But you never will, will you? Here is a clue. *Somebody threatens to kill me, I take precautions. *I am more than capable of defending myself from the agression of rsa terrorists, as you well know. *Because if you didn't believe I could take you easier than stealing candy from a baby, you would have shown up at Copper. LOL Amazing how you freaks never mention your own death threats, then start whining to the cops when I tell you to bring it on, you pathetic pussy. What death threats, Scottie? I've never seen one. The only threat I've seen is you threatening me. That's not the only threat. *He's also threatened me, pigo, Richard, Ted, Dave, Ant, Hobbs and Yabahoobs and I'm sure there are others I've forgotten. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe his threats against me were just bully-posturing, such as when I pointed out that my complaint to SPD seemed to have stopped his written threats, he quickly wrote one. It's become apparent that *so far* that's true. But in a civilized society one is not supposed to be allowed to keep bullying and making _empty_ threats up to the point that he goes over the edge and carries one out. One has to extrapolate his "under any circumstances" threat to mean that anytime you walk down any street that someone could walk up behind you and hit you with a stick. And that that is his stated intention. We've had the discussion before about his "threatening behavior". And is in fact the basis for past restraining orders. My main fear is that if someone were to actually meet him, he might feel trapped and act out irrationally. Mine is more that he'd see someone and sneak up behind them. As long as you can mount a defense a big yogi like that should be containable. It would be the AIDS and hepititis that I'd worry about then! I think he would run away given the chance, unless he thought he had been seen and recognized. Consider the rattlesnake - lots of noise and an impressive show, but no threat unless you confront them or surprise them and give them no way to escape. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 7:57*am, Scottum wrote:
On May 26, 2:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 12:25*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 8:47*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote: On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. An hourly occurrence for you, I'm sure. As I was saying? What about your post about taking a gun to temple? * Sure did. *Do you want to mention the clear death threats, people threatening to shoot me, people claiming to have done drive by's? I'd love for you to provide references to them, yes. But you never will, will you? Here is a clue. *Somebody threatens to kill me, I take precautions. *I am more than capable of defending myself from the agression of rsa terrorists, as you well know. *Because if you didn't believe I could take you easier than stealing candy from a baby, you would have shown up at Copper. LOL Amazing how you freaks never mention your own death threats, then start whining to the cops when I tell you to bring it on, you pathetic pussy. What death threats, Scottie? I've never seen one. The only threat I've seen is you threatening me. That's not the only threat. *He's also threatened me, pigo, Richard, Ted, Dave, Ant, Hobbs and Yabahoobs and I'm sure there are others I've forgotten. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 7:54*am, Scottum wrote:
On May 26, 2:53*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 12:25*pm, Scottum wrote: On May 26, 8:47*am, twobuddha wrote: On May 26, 7:31*am, pigo wrote: On May 25, 1:44*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Those no rule that says you can't make nutty claims, but for it to be valid or believable, you need to back it up with more than circular reasoning. *You might want to appear silly and nonsensical. *That is certainly your prerogative. And the one thing he appears successful at so far. This from Brain Fried Bob Thompson, who just whined that I am an extremely violent man likely to go postal and harm innocents? The mind boggles. An hourly occurrence for you, I'm sure. As I was saying? What about your post about taking a gun to temple? * Sure did. *Do you want to mention the clear death threats, people threatening to shoot me, people claiming to have done drive by's? Here is a clue. *Somebody threatens to kill me, I take precautions. *I am more than capable of defending myself from the agression of rsa terrorists, as you well know. *Because if you didn't believe I could take you easier than stealing candy from a baby, you would have shown up at Copper. Amazing how you freaks never mention your own death threats, then start whining to the cops when I tell you to bring it on, you pathetic pussy. What death threats? *When have I ever threatened violence against you? *Would you mind providing some backup to these wild acusations? I didn't think so. That sounds like a violent man to me. I most certainly can be violent with people who threaten violence. Got a problem with that? *Of course you do. *Stalking freaks always get all whiny when they think they might get held accountable. *But to equate going postal on innocents with being able and willing to kick the **** out of internet bullies who threaten my life? Examples please? Sounds like YOU are going postal, pppppppuuuuuuusssssssyyyyyy. *Just like your buddy Brain Fried Bob. I've got a lot of training and a lot of experience with violence. *I know how to control myself in dangerous situations. It is insane pppppuuussssiiiieeeesssss like you and Brain Fried who are likely to go postal, idiot. It sounds like you are the one making the threats here. *And what about your brothers Backlash post? *I sure sounds like he agreed that you were a violent man. It sure sounds like he lied his ass off the same way you are lying your ass off. One thing for su YOU aren't a violent man. *Obviously. *Unless we are talking about kids, women, small animals, etc. Here is a clue, dumb****. *You assholes threatened me, I told you what I would do if you tried to harm me and I challenged you to try to make good on your threats. What threats? *Examples please? I have never seen a one of you dickless freaks in eleven years. Which is exactly what I want. *Because if I ever see you, in any circumstances, you will discover if I am capable of violence. Which is why you were too much of a pussy to show up at Copper. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 7:11*am, pigo wrote:
On May 26, 8:39*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Sure, I'd simply direct the reader to your writing in this post and ask them if it seems like the work of a healthy, adjusted person. That gives me an idea. I can see the drivel flying off the screen. You shouldn't talk that way about your friend Pervert Dave. So there has to be a flurry of rediculousness going on. Starting with you not knowing how to spell ridiculous, eh, Brain Fried Bob? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH I wonder if it is not worth studying? Alan didn't have any luck getting trunky to meet him at a psychiatrist's office. Maybe we can bring the office to him? Holy ****, Birther Bob has really lost it. Tell you what, bitch. YOU can be my shrink. Just show up and analyze me. Ooooops forgot. That would take balls. Talk about ridiculous....... I'm pretty sure toecheese is just mental. To invent your own use for words and sentence structure is just weird. And then to hold the hundreds of millions that use English in contempt for not using your "new" language is just retarded. So toecheese = lost cause. Holy ****, irony meter invents a new language. But trunky is a different story. I don't need to see everything. We are all familiar with the repetitiveness and homoerotic fantasies. C'mon, Swift Boat Bob, you can come up with something better than that. But I will cop to repetitivenes. You keep telling the same lies, and I keep telling the truth. Truth is repetitive. You would understand that if you ever told the truth. But surely someone here must have colleagues or fellow students or something of that nature that would find this level of absurdity fasinating? I sure find THIS absurdity fascinating. I think that we all agree here that it's the attention he craves. Even though it's negative. And there's no doubt that this would be negative to him, BUT WOW, how negative! And how much attention. He could have entire college programs, classrooms and _real_ mental health professionals talking about him? After all that one guy that got duped by the recovered memory angle from this professional victim got something going. Maybe something along the same lines only truthful? Holy ****, every time I think Brain Fried Bob Thompson can't get any crazier, he gets crazier. This is a new one. Absurdly fascinating. Case studies on me? Entire classes? Maybe my own section in the DSM- V? Thanks to Brain Fried Bob, I'm going to be a STAR!!!!!!!! I know a few people that contribute here that travel in those circles. Why not talk it up? Couldn't hurt. What circles would that be? NONE of you have any connection whatsoever with any mental health professionals. You avoid perceptive people like the plague. The same way you avoid me, but you don't have to worry about most shrinks kicking your ass, Bob. Absurdly fascinating. |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Taichiskiing
On May 27, 8:47*am, Richard Henry wrote:
On May 27, 7:11*am, pigo wrote: On May 26, 8:39*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: Sure, I'd simply direct the reader to your writing in this post and ask them if it seems like the work of a healthy, adjusted person. That gives me an idea. I can see the drivel flying off the screen. So there has to be a flurry of rediculousness going on. I wonder if it is not worth studying? Alan didn't have any luck getting trunky to meet him at a psychiatrist's office. Maybe we can bring the office to him? I'm pretty sure toecheese is just mental. To invent your own use for words and sentence structure is just weird. And then to hold the hundreds of millions that use English in contempt for not using your "new" language is just retarded. So toecheese = lost cause. But trunky is a different story. I don't need to see everything. We are all familiar with the repetitiveness and homoerotic fantasies. But surely someone here must have colleagues or fellow students or something of that nature that would find this level of absurdity fasinating? I think that we all agree here that it's the attention he craves. Even though it's negative. And there's no doubt that this would be negative to him, BUT WOW, how negative! And how much attention. He could have entire college programs, classrooms and _real_ mental health professionals talking about him? After all that one guy that got duped by the recovered memory angle from this professional victim got something going. Maybe something along the same lines only truthful? I know a few people that contribute here that travel in those circles. Why not talk it up? Couldn't hurt. I would put scott in the lost-cause ward as well. I even feel guilty sometimes about enabling his rants. sure I do- I never feel guilty about enabling YOUR rants, Dickless Henry. I enjoy watching you make a fool out of yourself. Do you realize how stupid you look when you support such deranged bull****? Tell ya what. How about I enable SPD? Contact info? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Let's add them to the list of people doing case studies. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA I feel so guilty about enabling the EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME!!!!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABW HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABWHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HABWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taichiskiing | Stuart[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 39 | May 15th 10 01:41 PM |
Dear taichiskiing guy | Marty | Alpine Skiing | 1 | June 1st 07 12:25 AM |