Judge in Seattle Bans Man From a Newsgroup

!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:48:14 -0500, in uk.local.yorkshire "Carl
Sundquist" wrote:

"!Jones" wrote in message
...
It's odd that a recreational newsgroup would be as vitrolic as this
one is, I say. One usually sees such uncivilized discourse in the
alt.activism.* hierarchy; however, it's quite unusual to find it
dominating a group in the rec.* branch. Of course, you will always
see the odd poster in *any* group who will make an effort to insult
his or her (generally, "his") reader... herein, you have a large
cohort!

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60

Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones


Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:53:02 +0100, in alt.war.vietnam Kermit The Frog
wrote:

!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:48:14 -0500, in uk.local.yorkshire "Carl
Sundquist" wrote:

"!Jones" wrote in message
...
It's odd that a recreational newsgroup would be as vitrolic as this
one is, I say. One usually sees such uncivilized discourse in the
alt.activism.* hierarchy; however, it's quite unusual to find it
dominating a group in the rec.* branch. Of course, you will always
see the odd poster in *any* group who will make an effort to insult
his or her (generally, "his") reader... herein, you have a large
cohort!

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60

Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones


Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........

That's fine; I'm curious what they have to say.

Jones

!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:53:02 +0100, in alt.war.vietnam Kermit The Frog
wrote:

!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:48:14 -0500, in uk.local.yorkshire "Carl
Sundquist" wrote:

"!Jones" wrote in message
...
It's odd that a recreational newsgroup would be as vitrolic as this
one is, I say. One usually sees such uncivilized discourse in the
alt.activism.* hierarchy; however, it's quite unusual to find it
dominating a group in the rec.* branch. Of course, you will always
see the odd poster in *any* group who will make an effort to insult
his or her (generally, "his") reader... herein, you have a large
cohort!

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60
Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones

Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........

That's fine; I'm curious what they have to say.

Jones


I think the judge is making up. There's no
posts from either of these guys Scott Abrahams
or David Hobbs.

Kermit The Frog wrote:
!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:53:02 +0100, in alt.war.vietnam Kermit The Frog
wrote:

!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:48:14 -0500, in uk.local.yorkshire "Carl
Sundquist" wrote:

"!Jones" wrote in message
...
It's odd that a recreational newsgroup would be as vitrolic as this
one is, I say. One usually sees such uncivilized discourse in the
alt.activism.* hierarchy; however, it's quite unusual to find it
dominating a group in the rec.* branch. Of course, you will always
see the odd poster in *any* group who will make an effort to insult
his or her (generally, "his") reader... herein, you have a large
cohort!

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60

Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones

Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........

That's fine; I'm curious what they have to say.

Jones


I think the judge is making up.

No I'm not....

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:26:05 +0100, Kermit The Frog
wrote this crap:


http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60
Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones

Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........

That's fine; I'm curious what they have to say.

Jones


I think the judge is making up. There's no
posts from either of these guys Scott Abrahams
or David Hobbs.


Sure there is.





My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."

Horvath wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:26:05 +0100, Kermit The Frog
wrote this crap:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60
Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones

Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........
That's fine; I'm curious what they have to say.

Jones

I think the judge is making up. There's no
posts from either of these guys Scott Abrahams
or David Hobbs.


Sure there is.




They are not showing on AIOE

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:25:02 +0100, Kermit The Frog
wrote this crap:


I think the judge is making up. There's no
posts from either of these guys Scott Abrahams
or David Hobbs.


Sure there is.




They are not showing on AIOE


They'll be there.


Q: Who is Scott Abraham?
A: Scott Abraham, also known as "Schattie," "Buddha," "The Talking
Urinal," "SA," and some names so foul as to prohibit mentioning them
to newcomers, is a disgusting whacko from Seattle Washington. He
became infamous for being the only person ever kicked off the
internet.

Q: Why does everyone hate him?
A: Scottie has an early history of telling lies. When he was found
out he lost his marbles.

Q: Why does he hate everybody?
A: He lives in a basement, has no job, no life, no money, no career,
no future, he steals his food from a soup kitchen, and goes skiing
without lift tickets. He's a whacked-out psycho, who looks up to
everyone from his sewer. Since he can't crawl out of the gutter, he
tries to pull everyone down to his level.

Q: He says that only losers and terrorists post here. So why does he
stay?
A: He has no life. Having everyone hate him is the only
entertainment he gets.





My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."

Horvath wrote:

Q: Why does everyone hate him?
A: Scottie has an early history of telling lies. When he was found
out he lost his marbles.

Here's one of the funniest posts Scooter has made:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.s...1?dmode=source

I got my early training in violence as a boxer.
Then my mother worked for the Navy, and I lived next to the SEAL
training base and took an advanced course in applied mayhem.
Then I went to Nam (journalist, not soldier) and spent a lovely time
ducking bullets from people who were trying to kill me while I was
busy doing the same thing to them.
Got down to hand to hand at one point, Jeremiah. Loser dies. I'm
alive. Two bullet holes, but alive.
No, Jeremiah. You do not know how I fight, because I do not fight.
Fighting is for dumb**** morons like you.
I'm an ex-cop. Bodyguard. Security. 15 years experience in dealing
with stupid dumb punks like you who think youth matters.
I am a professional, Jeremiah. You would last less than ten seconds,
and the only question would be if you lived or not. I'm getting old
and fat, so I can't afford to take chances.....which means you go
down, go down fast, and I don't worry about whether you will ever ski
again...or walk, or see, or ****.
Before you run into someone like me who is in a mood to teach you some
manners, I suggest you shut your stupid dumb**** mouth, and quit
challenging folks who believe in dispensing some social darwinism
personally.

LMFAO!

On Jun 15, 2:15 pm, Sharky wrote:
Horvath wrote:
Q: Why does everyone hate him?
A: Scottie has an early history of telling lies. When he was found
out he lost his marbles.

Here's one of the funniest posts Scooter has made:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.s...1303cc619a1181...

I got my early training in violence as a boxer.
Then my mother worked for the Navy, and I lived next to the SEAL
training base and took an advanced course in applied mayhem.
Then I went to Nam (journalist, not soldier) and spent a lovely time
ducking bullets from people who were trying to kill me while I was
busy doing the same thing to them.
Got down to hand to hand at one point, Jeremiah. Loser dies. I'm
alive. Two bullet holes, but alive.
No, Jeremiah. You do not know how I fight, because I do not fight.
Fighting is for dumb**** morons like you.
I'm an ex-cop. Bodyguard. Security. 15 years experience in dealing
with stupid dumb punks like you who think youth matters.
I am a professional, Jeremiah. You would last less than ten seconds,
and the only question would be if you lived or not. I'm getting old
and fat, so I can't afford to take chances.....which means you go
down, go down fast, and I don't worry about whether you will ever ski
again...or walk, or see, or ****.
Before you run into someone like me who is in a mood to teach you some
manners, I suggest you shut your stupid dumb**** mouth, and quit
challenging folks who believe in dispensing some social darwinism
personally.

LMFAO!

ROFLMAO...wow. I don't think that's been linked to in RSA for at
least three years, so that's the first time I've seen it. That is so
priceless I bookmarked it. I will need it later to provide proof of
his claims.

Can I just Xpost this to alt.fan.scarecrow. They are usually
quite good at this sort of thing.



Kermit The Frog wrote:
!Jones wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:48:14 -0500, in uk.local.yorkshire "Carl
Sundquist" wrote:

"!Jones" wrote in message
...
It's odd that a recreational newsgroup would be as vitrolic as this
one is, I say. One usually sees such uncivilized discourse in the
alt.activism.* hierarchy; however, it's quite unusual to find it
dominating a group in the rec.* branch. Of course, you will always
see the odd poster in *any* group who will make an effort to insult
his or her (generally, "his") reader... herein, you have a large
cohort!

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C1A96F9582 60


Hummm... now, *that* piques my interest! I have not heard of that
happening before. The courts (quite rightly, IMO) are very reluctant
to referee Usenet squabbles as they usually don't ever motivate any
physical act.

I changed the title and cross-posted... if you trim the headers in any
replies, then it won't hurt my feelings any.

Jones


Everyone over to rec.skiing.alpine then........