In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's
neck
of
the
woods, then.

Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You
just
got
busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What
were
you
saying about credibility?

You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already
claimed
to
have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about
it...

Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember
your
lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never
did.
Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying.

Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this:

No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious,
ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to
make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying.

'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there,
wasn't
worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters,
identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably
would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried
about
you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate,
and those asshole ain't got the balls." '

How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if
you
never contacted them?

Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted
California
LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are
insane.

And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise:

1. How did you know what they decided to do?

2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place?

3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be
aware, I can produce the link if needed).

Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I
expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter.

Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I
had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did.

So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really
trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a
California agency, are you?

Baker, deal with getting busted lying. Nothing semantic about it.
You lied. Period. Admit it. Be a man.

Where was the lie?

You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You
couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact
with law enforcement.


Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do.
And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie.

How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact
with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place?

Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at!

I punked out? Amazing. You lied, got busted lying, continue to
justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you
talk ****.

Yup. Punked out... ...again.

Truly amazing. From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler.

I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower....


....and I was right!

You are insane. Get help.

Can't deal with the questions, huh?

Yeah...

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg