Vern93
November 25th 03, 01:56 AM
Bert this is OUTRAGEOUS. Have you lost your everloving mind? First
Ishee gets spammed, and now me. Do not ever send me your spam again.
As I write this, I am in the process of deleting this email account.
Do not ever email me any more of your screed and foul language. This is
inappropriate and in clear violation of the University of Phoenix
Anti-harassment policy "Offensive conduct, verbal or written including
sexually explicit jokes, comments, innuendo, or other tasteless action
that would offend a reasonably sensitive person." (http://www.phoenix.edu/catalog/policy.html)
Additionally it falls under the generally accepted definition of Spam
"Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as
part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially
identical content." ( http://www.monkeys.com/spam-defined/ )
I know when Ishee had this problem she posted her online harassment as
evidence that it was mensbbs and RSA specific and spam. I will do the
same.
Your thoughts on using proprietary servers and resources to send
unwanted and/or inappropriate communication is well documented. (As
many here, including Mr Hobbs and Miss Kerrison, can attest.) I am
currently considering undertaking measures to let the University of
Phoenix know what sort of use to which you are putting their resources.
An IMMEDIATE apology would be a good start.
Ironically, your SPAM is entitled "Re: Reporting Internet Harassment"
This is only one of the offending spams.
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:34:14 PM CST
To: Vern93
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:34:14 PM CST
To: Vern93 >
In article >,
"Bert Hoff" > wrote:
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:38:54 PM CST
To: Vern93 >
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vern93" >
Newsgroups: rec.skiing.alpine
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
>
> >>I haven't posted any Men's transcripts here.
>
> >Maybe/Maybe not. I know it was either you or Scott. It's hard to keep
> >you mensbbs troublemakers straight. Hell, maybe it *was* Scott who was
> >posting mensbbs transcripts. No, that's not right - that incurrs a
> >"LIFETIME BAN" to mesnbbs. But it does seem like it was Scott.
>
> >>Alan the Ass and Richard the Dick keep clamoring for men's posts to be
> >>discussed here.
>
> >Actually, as we've covered at least once already, you and Scott show up
> >in RSA bleating about your mensbbes dirty laundry and then act outraged
> >when folks comment on your stained sheets and and urine stench, and then
> >you two act all outraged "Our menbbs dirty laundry is none of your
> >business!!!! Please don't comment on it!!! Wah!!!!"
> Nope. Richard the Dick keeps on whining about Men's posts and
> wants me to talk about his posts there. Alan the Ass chimes right
> in.
>
> You haven't criticized either one of them
>
> So post your proof.
>
> >>If you weren't such a hypocrite, you would object to their posts.
>
> >Actually I have, today or maybe yesterday. But you mensbbs interlopers
> >are so prolific, I can't comment on ALL your disruptive posts.
>
> Prove it.
>
> >>Of course, if you weren't such a hypocrite you'd object to your *own*
> >>posts
> >>about the kinds of posts that are made to Men's.
>
> >Bert, I have offered and offered to discuss your mensbbs "goings on" in
> >mensbbs or in a suitable ANNEXCAFE group. You ignore this and seem
> >intent on discussing your mensbbs issues here.
> You're the one intent on talking about men's bbs issues here, not me.
>
> You keep on bringing it up, commenting on what's posted there and
> bring men's up in completely unrelated threads, like my post about
> harasser Alex Heney.
>
> >Make up your mind.
>
> >Dave
Ishee gets spammed, and now me. Do not ever send me your spam again.
As I write this, I am in the process of deleting this email account.
Do not ever email me any more of your screed and foul language. This is
inappropriate and in clear violation of the University of Phoenix
Anti-harassment policy "Offensive conduct, verbal or written including
sexually explicit jokes, comments, innuendo, or other tasteless action
that would offend a reasonably sensitive person." (http://www.phoenix.edu/catalog/policy.html)
Additionally it falls under the generally accepted definition of Spam
"Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as
part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially
identical content." ( http://www.monkeys.com/spam-defined/ )
I know when Ishee had this problem she posted her online harassment as
evidence that it was mensbbs and RSA specific and spam. I will do the
same.
Your thoughts on using proprietary servers and resources to send
unwanted and/or inappropriate communication is well documented. (As
many here, including Mr Hobbs and Miss Kerrison, can attest.) I am
currently considering undertaking measures to let the University of
Phoenix know what sort of use to which you are putting their resources.
An IMMEDIATE apology would be a good start.
Ironically, your SPAM is entitled "Re: Reporting Internet Harassment"
This is only one of the offending spams.
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:34:14 PM CST
To: Vern93
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:34:14 PM CST
To: Vern93 >
In article >,
"Bert Hoff" > wrote:
From: Bert Hoff >
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
Date: November 23, 2003 11:38:54 PM CST
To: Vern93 >
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vern93" >
Newsgroups: rec.skiing.alpine
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Reporting Internet Harrassment
>
> >>I haven't posted any Men's transcripts here.
>
> >Maybe/Maybe not. I know it was either you or Scott. It's hard to keep
> >you mensbbs troublemakers straight. Hell, maybe it *was* Scott who was
> >posting mensbbs transcripts. No, that's not right - that incurrs a
> >"LIFETIME BAN" to mesnbbs. But it does seem like it was Scott.
>
> >>Alan the Ass and Richard the Dick keep clamoring for men's posts to be
> >>discussed here.
>
> >Actually, as we've covered at least once already, you and Scott show up
> >in RSA bleating about your mensbbes dirty laundry and then act outraged
> >when folks comment on your stained sheets and and urine stench, and then
> >you two act all outraged "Our menbbs dirty laundry is none of your
> >business!!!! Please don't comment on it!!! Wah!!!!"
> Nope. Richard the Dick keeps on whining about Men's posts and
> wants me to talk about his posts there. Alan the Ass chimes right
> in.
>
> You haven't criticized either one of them
>
> So post your proof.
>
> >>If you weren't such a hypocrite, you would object to their posts.
>
> >Actually I have, today or maybe yesterday. But you mensbbs interlopers
> >are so prolific, I can't comment on ALL your disruptive posts.
>
> Prove it.
>
> >>Of course, if you weren't such a hypocrite you'd object to your *own*
> >>posts
> >>about the kinds of posts that are made to Men's.
>
> >Bert, I have offered and offered to discuss your mensbbs "goings on" in
> >mensbbs or in a suitable ANNEXCAFE group. You ignore this and seem
> >intent on discussing your mensbbs issues here.
> You're the one intent on talking about men's bbs issues here, not me.
>
> You keep on bringing it up, commenting on what's posted there and
> bring men's up in completely unrelated threads, like my post about
> harasser Alex Heney.
>
> >Make up your mind.
>
> >Dave