Re: Fair and Balanced or Liberal Nonsense

[Walt]

jvwalker51 wrote:

> PS: For you UK assholes that are intent upon telling us how to live, ****
> You. Why do you think we threw you dickheads out in the first place. We
> have done quite nicely without you. I've been in your country. I like mine
> much better. Mind your own ****ing business and keep your opinions about us
> to yourself or expect to get crammed right down your throat.

Thank you for that insightful comment. I'm sure you have done much to
convert those who are still forming an opinion...

--
//-Walt
//
// "...the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
// That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being
// attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
// exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
// - Herman Goering

[lal_truckee]

jvwalker51 wrote:
> To address the matter of the credibility of the media - The column in the
> Wall Street Journal about the BBC was written by Gerald Kaufman -Labor Party
> member of parliament.

Labor?! LABOR!? Whoops. Automatic disqualification. Laborers don't even
ski. Clearly confused priorities. Obviously we must locate the skiers
surreptitiously embedded in Parlament by the great Ullr/Skadi Cabal, now
ready to rise up and throw off the yoke of demented politics and get on
with the business of building ski lifts; or, in the UK, building dry slopes.

[Walt]

lal_truckee wrote:
> jvwalker51 wrote:
> > To address the matter of the credibility of the media - The column in the
> > Wall Street Journal about the BBC was written by Gerald Kaufman -Labor Party
> > member of parliament.
>
> Labor?! LABOR!? Whoops. Automatic disqualification.

Yep. There's no such thing as the Labor Party in the UK. Let's see,
we've got

Labour Party
Conservative Party (Torries)
Social Democrat Party
Silly Party
Very Silly Party
Stark-Monster-Raving-Loony Party

But, no Labor Party.
Sorry to be a party pooper.
(sorry for that pun. )
((sorry for that appology. ))


> Laborers don't even ski.

Whadaya mean? A laborer is anybody who works for a living. I work for
a living. I ski.

I think what you meant to say is Laborers don't ski at Vail.


--
//-Walt
//
// ...your sig here...

[Walt]

lal_truckee wrote:
>
> Walt wrote:
>
> >>Laborers don't even ski.
> >
> >
> > Whadaya mean? A laborer is anybody who works for a living. I work for
> > a living. I ski.
> >
> > I think what you meant to say is Laborers don't ski at Vail.
>
> Nonsense. Laborers don't ski. Laborers fix the road to the ski slopes.
> Laborers shovel avalanche debris. Laborers are lifties. Therefore
> laborers snowboard. They don't ski.
>
> By definition, you can't be a laborer. Unless you're a secret
> snowboarder? Are you? Have I been inadvertently polite to a snowboarder?
> The horror - the horror. Is your real name Kurtz?

No, it's Korzeniowski. Why do you ask?


--
//-Walt
//
//

[Walt]

bdubya wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:29:10 -0700, lal_truckee

> >Nonsense. Laborers don't ski. Laborers fix the road to the ski slopes.
> >Laborers shovel avalanche debris. Laborers are lifties. Therefore
> >laborers snowboard. They don't ski.
> >
> >By definition, you can't be a laborer. Unless you're a secret
> >snowboarder? Are you? Have I been inadvertently polite to a snowboarder?
> >The horror - the horror. Is your real name Kurtz?
>
> Hmm....there may be a geographic disparity in play here. I remember
> how long the liftlines at Pine Knob would get after the day shift
> ended at the Fiero plant. Maybe if Tahoe had more of a manufacturing
> base.....

You got a point there - round here Carharts outnumber Bogners (and ski
about as well...)

--
//-Walt
//
// ...sig space for rent...

[lal_truckee]

Walt wrote:
> lal_truckee wrote:
>
>>Walt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Laborers don't even ski.
>>>
>>>
>>>Whadaya mean? A laborer is anybody who works for a living. I work for
>>>a living. I ski.
>>>
>>>I think what you meant to say is Laborers don't ski at Vail.
>>
>>Nonsense. Laborers don't ski. Laborers fix the road to the ski slopes.
>>Laborers shovel avalanche debris. Laborers are lifties. Therefore
>>laborers snowboard. They don't ski.
>>
>>By definition, you can't be a laborer. Unless you're a secret
>>snowboarder? Are you? Have I been inadvertently polite to a snowboarder?
>>The horror - the horror. Is your real name Kurtz?
>
>
> No, it's Korzeniowski. Why do you ask?

Good to meet you, Teodor ...

[Sue]

In message >, lal_truckee
> writes
>
>Labor?! LABOR!? Whoops. Automatic disqualification. Laborers don't even
>ski.

No, but the Labour Government isn't made up of labourers, it's
frightfully middle class and the only thing that keeps it from skiing is
its fear of loss of control.

>Clearly confused priorities. Obviously we must locate the skiers
>surreptitiously embedded in Parlament

You'll find them somewhere expensive, Davos/Klosters say.

>get on with the business of building ski lifts; or, in the UK, building
>dry slopes.
>
Snowdomes, mate. They're still no fun, we want spectacular mountain
scenery, solid regional food and local beer. We're expanding the EC's
ski resources by taking in Turkey, the CR and Bulgaria.
--
Sue ];(:)

[Dave Stallard]

jvwalker51 wrote:

> It's all bull**** from morons intent on removing the current administration.
> It's fine to dislike the guy or his policies but this intellectually
> dishonest bull**** and the "ends justify the means" crap clearly
> demonstrates YOUR ethics and morals. And to put it mildly, there ain't no
> way in hell, I'm allowing "liberals" like you to rule my life. So stick it
> up your ass.

Here's some more liberal nonsense for you, from that well-known liberal
Pat Buchanan.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33709

Dave

[bdubya]

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:05:27 -0400, Dave Stallard >
wrote:

>jvwalker51 wrote:
>
>> It's all bull**** from morons intent on removing the current administration.
>> It's fine to dislike the guy or his policies but this intellectually
>> dishonest bull**** and the "ends justify the means" crap clearly
>> demonstrates YOUR ethics and morals. And to put it mildly, there ain't no
>> way in hell, I'm allowing "liberals" like you to rule my life. So stick it
>> up your ass.
>
>Here's some more liberal nonsense for you, from that well-known liberal
>Pat Buchanan.
>
>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33709
>

ITYM "well-known lunatic". Have you read his stance on ski safety?
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W1A025565

bw

[uglymoney]

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:41:00 -0500, bdubya
> wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:05:27 -0400, Dave Stallard >
>wrote:
>
>>jvwalker51 wrote:
>>
>>> It's all bull**** from morons intent on removing the current administration.
>>> It's fine to dislike the guy or his policies but this intellectually
>>> dishonest bull**** and the "ends justify the means" crap clearly
>>> demonstrates YOUR ethics and morals. And to put it mildly, there ain't no
>>> way in hell, I'm allowing "liberals" like you to rule my life. So stick it
>>> up your ass.
>>
>>Here's some more liberal nonsense for you, from that well-known liberal
>>Pat Buchanan.
>>
>>http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33709
>>
>
>ITYM "well-known lunatic". Have you read his stance on ski safety?
>http://makeashorterlink.com/?W1A025565
>
>bw

Ahahhhhaaha!

Very funny piece.

It is well known that Al Gore is an avid waterskier. One of
his daughters competed competitively in college. Also,
during the last campaign, he rode the Delta Queen up through
Iowa, and watched a waterski show across the river in Praire
Du Chen, WI, put on by some folks I know.

The seat belts on chairlifts thing is great. Nader would
have a fit if he ever went to France. I don't know how many
lifts I got on that had nobody attending the thing at all.
Nader prolly just go nuts at that.

nate

[InMyTree]

> PS: For you UK assholes that are intent upon telling us how to live, ****
> You. Why do you think we threw you dickheads out in the first place. We
> have done quite nicely without you. I've been in your country. I like
mine
> much better. Mind your own ****ing business and keep your opinions about
us
> to yourself or expect to get crammed right down your throat.
>

I will mind my own business if you mind your own. I don't care what America
does domestically, just internationally. Stop starting wars, stop
restricting trade, stop giving weapons to countries to they can blow up
other countries that America doesn't like, stop allowing American
corporations to take advantage of the poorest people in the world in pursuit
of profits, and stop placing puppet governments in place to suit your
own needs and maybe then I will stop complaining about America.

Gee.. that sounds really liberal and left wing. You know, before September
11 I had completely different opinions about all this stuff, I would say I
was even right wing. But after watching Bush, I can see my own right wing
tendancy's exagerated 100 times, and I don't like the outcome. Bush is teh
best thing that has happened to me and a lot of people I know in a
"political view" sense. He has shown us how ugly the republican mindset
(which is duplicated world wide) can be.

[InMyTree]

I read that speech.. its a load of crap..

"pigo" > wrote in message
...
>
> http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.18111/news_detail.asp
>
> This is Cheney's speech from 7-24-03.
>
> It makes the case as well as any. It's a little bit long but it's to the
> point.
>
> If you want to argue it, please quote a whole paragraph. I don't see how
> one could but let's not use that lame DNC trick and leave the front of
> the sentence off to make it support your view.
>
>
>
>

[InMyTree]

I didn't pick, for example, a particular paragraph and point out what was
wrong because I told you I'm not going to go into long winded discussions on
this newsgroup, if I can help myself.. copy the speech, put it in an email
to newsgroups_at_andrewhutchinson.net and I will gladly tell you why it is
crap..

And I like top posting. We've had this discussion before, and I still think
top posting is better.. so I'm going to continue to do it..

"pigo" > wrote in message
...
>
> "BrritSki" > wrote in message
> ...
> > InMyTree wrote:
> >
> > > "pigo" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > > http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.18111/news_detail.asp
> > > >
> > > > This is Cheney's speech from 7-24-03.
> > > >
> > > > It makes the case as well as any. It's a little bit long but it's
> to the
> > > > point.
> > > >
> > > > If you want to argue it, please quote a whole paragraph. I don't
> see how
> > > > one could but let's not use that lame DNC trick and leave the
> front of
> > > > the sentence off to make it support your view.
> > > >
> >
> > <top-posting and apostrophe fixed>
> >
> > > I read that speech.. it's a load of crap..
> >
> > An intellectual tour-de-force. You've convinced me alright.
>
> I wonder why he didn't pick, for example, a particular paragraph and
> dispute exact points?
>
>