Re: Sierra Club sells out!!

[Walt]

lal_truckee wrote:

> Bev is real. Real name, real person, real home town.

And I thought that she was just a figment of my imagination like the
rest of you.

--
//-Walt
// Official Beer Taster for usenet
//

[markharf]

"Brian McGarry" > wrote in message >...
>
> Kewl...I hope Bev posts on RMD a lot more!

....and on RSB a lot less. Enjoy.

[pigo]

"CurtisLemay" > wrote in message
news:cGhhdHBoaWw=.2c4ecf435c6cd21e09db7a3ae00dddea @1057264649.cotse.net.
...
> vlj wrote:
>
> > "CurtisLemay" > sez:
> >
>
> > Well then, he can forget my advice about buying a gun and taking
> care of
> > himself. If he is indeed under a restraining order then he is a
> "prohibited
> > person" and his/her right to own a firearm has been taken away.
> Thank
> > congresscritter Lautenberg for the pleasure. His right to be a
> numbnuts,
> > however, is still valid without infringement of any kind.
> >
> > VLJ
>
> You're more than a little late, he has already bragged about
> owning firearms without a permit. He has bragged about scaring
> teens with them on his old block. We reserve the right to tell him to
> go **** himself.

And let's not forget this little gem from his brother:

I am Scott Barak Abraham's brother. I started to write a long
rebuttal to his story in Backlash ("Repressed Memory Syndrome,"
The Backlash, March 1995), but then I stopped. No matter what I
say, some will accept, some will not. But there is a thing that
must be said. Scott Barak Abraham was not, I repeat not, abused
within our household. Since this alleged abuse is one of the
pivotal points of the article, I feel it calls the validity of
the whole article into question.
Mr. Abraham was a multiple substance abuser for over twenty
years, I have never used any drugs and haven't had a drink since
I was 15 years old, 27 years ago, and was never drunk even once.
I bring this up not for moral judgment, just for one point. Mr.
Abraham poisoned his mind and body for over twenty years with
mind altering drugs and substances, all of which have been
scientifically proven to affect intelligence, perception and
memory.

Finally, as children, up to my 17th birthday Mr. Abraham molested
me, violently abused me almost daily, and to this day uses words
of derision and insult to attack and intimidate me. He denies
this. If nothing else, I remember him doing this, he denies it.
He says both of us were victims of multiple abusers, and I deny
that with absolutely no hesitation or reservation. Since the
article says False Memory Syndrome doesn't exist, he is quite
wrong, as apparently one of us is the victim of said syndrome.

A last thought. Mr. Abraham's behavior is nothing new, it hasn't
changed ever. He threatened and intimidated when he was six, he
threatened and intimidated when he was 15, he threatened and
intimidated when he was 25, he threatens and intimidates when he
is 43.

I do not use my name at the request of the publisher.

[Vern93]

In article <rQPMa.628$7e.269@fed1read07>,
"Richard Henry" > wrote:

> Hmph. Me grouped with Bert. I knew I was getting old.
>
> I wonder what Scott will have to say about this.

Probably the same thing he has to say about everything.

(cross posts removed)

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.8d9696c7546c54588778b8011c2bf236@1057 358701.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/4/03 3:45 PM:

> Sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>
>
>>
>> No, they just have better things to do.
>
> Like get donuts?

Like use their real names.
>
> The evidence of stalking and death
>> threats are in google. Go find them.
>
> Yeah, like the knee-capping threat made by bobaloobob.

BWHAHAHAHAHAH! You really are insane. What a liar! What a wacko!
>
> You are such a frickin' joke, bob. Not one voice has risen up to
> support you. Why? You figure it out, moron.

Simple. They are afraid an asshole psychopath like you will start stalking
and defaming and lying.

> Have you gotten auto
> insurance yet? Are you still driving without a license? You're just
> scum with a bent melon head, a big mouth and a dead dick.

Yeah, but I can kick your ass, and I'm not a psychopathic coward who hides
and spews filth from anonymity.
Get ****ed.

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.faaa948519fdf84cb00dbe9e783c3a97@1057 431945.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/5/03 12:05 PM:

> sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>> in article
>
>>>> No, they just have better things to do.
>>>
>>> Like get donuts?
>>
>> Like use their real names.
>
> You were writing about the cops, you idiot. Why would the cops be
> afraid of using their real names?


Why are YOU afraid of using your real name, wack job?
>
>
>>> Yeah, like the knee-capping threat made by bobaloobob.
>>
>> BWHAHAHAHAHAH! You really are insane. What a liar! What a
> wacko!
>
> Poachise certainly thought it was a threat (although coming from a
> blithering incompetent moron it really couldn't be taken seriously.
> After all how many crack addicts are going to accept an IOU from
> you).

As I was saying about psychopathic, pathological liars who lie and defame
tell the most insane of lies? Erik Leonard is such a wack job that he
committed a felony and lied in court over this stupid newsgroup.
Clue time, asshole. Anyone isn't psychopathic didn't think it was a threat.
>
>> Simple. They are afraid an asshole psychopath like you will start
> stalking
>> and defaming and lying.
>
> I have a even simpler reason, you're a frickin worthless joke and
> no one can stand you.

I have an even simpler reason. They are afraid an asshole psychopath like
you will start stalking and lying and defaming.
>
>>> Have you gotten auto
>>> insurance yet? Are you still driving without a license? You're
> just
>>> scum with a bent melon head, a big mouth and a dead dick.
>>
>> Yeah, but I can kick your ass, and I'm not a psychopathic coward
> who hides
>> and spews filth from anonymity.
>
> Somehow, bob, your attitude clearly demonstrates why you can't
> hold a job.
>

Somehow, asshole, your attitude clearly demonstrates why you are a coward.
Anytime.
>
>
>> Get ****ed.
>
> Actually I do on a regular basis and my partner is neither latex or
> livestock like yours.
>

Whores and children don't count, asshole. Neither does Kerrison.

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.1a4deaceb3ff7b6828c9959333b33e5d@1057 455416.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/5/03 6:36 PM:

> sponge bob dirty pants
>> in article
>>
>
>>
>> Why are YOU afraid of using your real name, wack job?
>
> At least I'm not running from the cops, bob. You know, like you
> posting as bobaloobob under the restraining order.
>

Running from the cops? You truly are insane. Why are YOU afraid of using
your real name, wack job?
>
>
>> As I was saying about psychopathic, pathological liars who lie
> and defame
>> tell the most insane of lies? Erik Leonard is such a wack job
> that he
>> committed a felony and lied in court over this stupid newsgroup.
>
> He didn't get slapped with a restraining order(s) and he doesn't
> have a criminal record like you.

He lied and committed perjury to get a restraining order, wack job. And I
don't have a criminal record. Period. You lying sack of ****.
>
>
>> Clue time, asshole. Anyone isn't psychopathic didn't think it was
> a threat.
>
> Based upon your past behavior, that would be a dangerous
> assumption.
>

You truly are insane. Lie, lie, and lie some more. YOU sick wack jobs are
the ones who make threats, I simply invite you to show up and try to make
good on your threats. Coward.
>
>> I have an even simpler reason. They are afraid an asshole
> psychopath like
>> you will start stalking and lying and defaming.
>
> Care to name someone, bob, besides yourself. Thought not.

Everybody who left. If I name them, you stalk them.
>
>>> Actually I do on a regular basis and my partner is neither latex
> or
>>> livestock like yours.
>>>
>>
>> Whores
> (at least I've got the money)

What kind of loser spends money on children?

>> and children
> (that's your schtick, **** face, not mine)

Wanna say that in person, coward? More false allegations of child
molestation.

>> don't count asshole. Neither does Kerrison
> (At least she has some taste and wanted to avoid whatever wee
> beasties that are floating around in your blood system).

Shame that psychopathy is not caused by a bug, psychopath.

[Diane]

scottabe > wrote in message >...
> in article
> cGhhdHBoaWw=.1a4deaceb3ff7b6828c9959333b33e5d@1057 455416.cotse.net,
> CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/5/03 6:36 PM:
>
> > sponge bob dirty pants
> >> in article
> >>
>
> >>
> >> Why are YOU afraid of using your real name, wack job?
> >
> > At least I'm not running from the cops, bob. You know, like you
> > posting as bobaloobob under the restraining order.
> >
>
> Running from the cops? You truly are insane. Why are YOU afraid of using
> your real name, wack job?
> >
> >
> >> As I was saying about psychopathic, pathological liars who lie
> and defame
> >> tell the most insane of lies? Erik Leonard is such a wack job
> that he
> >> committed a felony and lied in court over this stupid newsgroup.
> >
> > He didn't get slapped with a restraining order(s) and he doesn't
> > have a criminal record like you.
>
> He lied and committed perjury to get a restraining order, wack job. And I
> don't have a criminal record. Period. You lying sack of ****.
> >
> >
> >> Clue time, asshole. Anyone isn't psychopathic didn't think it was
> > a threat.
> >
> > Based upon your past behavior, that would be a dangerous
> > assumption.
> >
>
> You truly are insane. Lie, lie, and lie some more. YOU sick wack jobs are
> the ones who make threats, I simply invite you to show up and try to make
> good on your threats. Coward.
> >
> >> I have an even simpler reason. They are afraid an asshole
> psychopath like
> >> you will start stalking and lying and defaming.
> >
> > Care to name someone, bob, besides yourself. Thought not.
>
> Everybody who left. If I name them, you stalk them.
> >
> >>> Actually I do on a regular basis and my partner is neither latex
> or
> >>> livestock like yours.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Whores
> > (at least I've got the money)
>
> What kind of loser spends money on children?
>
> >> and children
> > (that's your schtick, **** face, not mine)
>
> Wanna say that in person, coward? More false allegations of child
> molestation.
>
> >> don't count asshole. Neither does Kerrison
> > (At least she has some taste and wanted to avoid whatever wee
> > beasties that are floating around in your blood system).
>
> Shame that psychopathy is not caused by a bug, psychopath.

HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!

[Richard Henry]

Diane > wrote in message
om...
>
> HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
> TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!

Actually, it's not appropriate material for a skiing site, either.
Fruitless complaints to Scott's ISP might make you feel better.

Usually, complaining about newsgroup content just makes it worse. If it
distresses you, learn to use a filter. The key words "false allegations"
will probably work pretty well.

BTW, some people complain about POSTING IN ALL CAPS, TOO!!!!!!

[Alex Heney]

On 5 Jul 2003 23:49:52 -0700, (Diane) wrote:

<snip>
>
>HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
>TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!

It isn't appropriate material for ANY newsgroup.

Please just killfile the protagonists, and forget about them. Most of
the people still responding to Scott don't post anything else, so you
won't miss anything by killfiling them.

--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
This tagline only uses recycled keystrokes.

To reply by email, my address is aDOTjDOTheneyATbtinternetDOTcom

[scottabe]

in article , The Real Bev at
wrote on 7/6/03 11:12 AM:

> Richard Henry wrote:
>>
>> Diane > wrote:
>>>
>>> HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
>>> TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!
>>
>> Actually, it's not appropriate material for a skiing site, either.
>> Fruitless complaints to Scott's ISP might make you feel better.
>>
>> Usually, complaining about newsgroup content just makes it worse. If it
>> distresses you, learn to use a filter. The key words "false allegations"
>> will probably work pretty well.
>>
>> BTW, some people complain about POSTING IN ALL CAPS, TOO!!!!!!
>
> As well as the excessive use of exclamation points.

Some of us take exception to vile ****s like Bev Ashley, who like to falsely
accuse innocent men of implanting memories of childhood abuse. We take
great exception to her despicable, vile lies. Unfortunately, the people of
rsa do NOT take exception to the grossest of defamations.

[scottabe]

in article , Alex Heney at
wrote on 7/6/03 1:54 PM:

> On 5 Jul 2003 23:49:52 -0700, (Diane) wrote:
>
> <snip>
>>
>> HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
>> TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!
>
> It isn't appropriate material for ANY newsgroup.

Hear, hear. So tell me why this sick pathological liar hangs out with those
who falsely accuse innocent men of molesting children, defends them, drinks
with them, skis with them? What a lying hypocrit!
>
> Please just killfile the protagonists, and forget about them. Most of
> the people still responding to Scott don't post anything else, so you
> won't miss anything by killfiling them.

You'll just miss the truth about insane liars like Alex Heney, who denies
that anybody ever falsely accused me of molesting children, despite
THOUSANDS of such posts.

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.0353bfdac3b9bf8b8ca87461577c6f08@1057 529968.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/6/03 3:19 PM:

> The Global Dork wrote:
> <snip>
>
> You won't miss anything by killfiling this fool either. His mind is
> one of the most pedestrian I've ever seen (he's sanctimonious and
> stupid but doesn't know it). He has an opinion on everything but
> knows nothing.
>
>
Sanctimonious?
BWHAHAHAHAHA!
It ain't hard to be sanctimonious around the sewer of usenet, rsa. I've met
hardened cons that had more moral and ethical development than most of the
scumbags who post here.

[Diane]

"Richard Henry" > wrote in message news:<%oQNa.2071$7e.508@fed1read07>...
> Diane > wrote in message
> om...
> >
> > HEY WHY DON'T YOU GUYS TAKE THIS ARGUMENT OFF-LINE...NONE OF US WANT
> > TO SEE IT...IT ISN'T APPROPRIATE MATERIAL FOR A HIKING SITE!!!!!!
>
> Actually, it's not appropriate material for a skiing site, either.
> Fruitless complaints to Scott's ISP might make you feel better.
>
> Usually, complaining about newsgroup content just makes it worse. If it
> distresses you, learn to use a filter. The key words "false allegations"
> will probably work pretty well.
>
> BTW, some people complain about POSTING IN ALL CAPS, TOO!!!!!!

I know what all caps means...I felt it was appropriate in this case!!!!!

[Dave Stallard]

scottabe wrote:
>
> Damn, I wish time could heal the thousands of dollars these sick ****s cost
> me, the unfairly besmirched reputation in the skiing business,

"Unfairly besmirched reputation" is one of my favorite Abrahamian stock
phrases.

Exactly what "reputation" did you think you had in the skiing business,
Schattie?

Dave

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.6f1a7570dc67cced015c25f3f8a77bab@1057 590582.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/7/03 8:09 AM:

> sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Don't forget sane, honest, decent, moral, ethical, and a better
> skier than
>> Vinnie Walker, a certifiably insane (several stays in a mental
> hospital)
>> pathological liar who also likes to make gross defamations and
> false
>> accusations.
>
> Panty sniffer, that guy was talking about the Global Dork. What an
> idiot. I've got to say that you have a real interesting tactic of picking
> on people that you think are weak.

This from a sick cowardly **** who threatens my life from anonymity? How
insane can this asshole get?

> What do they call people like
> that, oh yeah, a bully.

They call you a psychopathic coward.

> I call it being a lazy-assed chicken-**** ****
> face. Loved your fabrications about Boots. cluck, cluck, cluck.

This from a sick cowardly **** who threatens my life from anonymity?

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.9a5018e2c187dd87e2eeb2661d26c9a5@1057 671102.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/8/03 6:31 AM:

> sponge bob dirty pants:
>
>
>> This from a sick cowardly **** who threatens my life from
> anonymity? How
>> insane can this asshole get?
>
> Who is that, **** face? I just call people names. Actually it looks
> like a usual tactic of yours, projection and deflection. Care to
> produce any proof on or offline that I've done any such thing.

This from a sick cowardly **** who threatens my life from anonymity?
>
>
>>
>>> What do they call people like
>>> that, oh yeah, a bully.
>>
>> They call you a psychopathic coward.
>
> How is that related to anything I've said. You being a **** face
> bully has absolutely nothing to do with me.

They call you a psychopathic coward.
>
>>> I call it being a lazy-assed chicken-**** ****
>>> face. Loved your fabrications about Boots. cluck, cluck, cluck.
>>
>> This from a sick cowardly **** who threatens my life from
> anonymity?
>
>
> Show me the threats, you unemployed, lard-ass, brain-dead
> lewzer.

You really are insane, aren't you?

[Walt]

IdaSpode wrote:

> Nah, we just need to get Congress to repeal the Law of Gravity. No
> more avalanches, no more rock slides, no more deadfall to cut each
> spring, no more erosion, yada, yada, yada...

No can do, according to the zeroth amendment: "Congress shall make no
law abridging the laws of physics or the free exercise thereof."

--
//-Walt
// Official Beer Taster for usenet
//

[bdubya]

On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:23:47 -0600, IdaSpode >
wrote:

>On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:12:36 -0500, bdubya >
>wrote:
>
>
>>>> IRKurt wrote:
>>>> > CLIP not to mention catastraphic environmental devastation caused
>>>> > by avalanches!
>>>>
>>>> Wow, you guys are serious! I'm gonna join up. We have to do something
>>>> about Mother Nature abusing the wilderness! Do you think we should
>>>> picket, or just lock the old Babe up?
>
>>Y'know, I'm thinking of those wildly massive avalanche fences that
>>festoon the mountain faces above so many villages in the Alps. Maybe
>>we need some of those in the backcountry?
>
>Nah, we just need to get Congress to repeal the Law of Gravity.
(snip)

Er, please note that this is crossposted to an alpine skiing group,
wherein such a suggestion is anathema of the sort that merits BURNING
AT THE STAKE!!!!

bw

[The Real Bev]

Walt wrote:
>
> IdaSpode wrote:
>
> > Nah, we just need to get Congress to repeal the Law of Gravity. No
> > more avalanches, no more rock slides, no more deadfall to cut each
> > spring, no more erosion, yada, yada, yada...
>
> No can do, according to the zeroth amendment: "Congress shall make no
> law abridging the laws of physics or the free exercise thereof."

But they still do their damnedest anyway!

--
Cheers, Bev
************************************************** **
Gravity -- it's not just a suggestion, it's the LAW.

[Dave Stallard]

pigo wrote:

> "Persuade" by making them *afraid* to make the investment. "Persuade"
> them by making them *afraid* of what might happen next. "Persuade" them
> by *worrying* that someone might get hurt that next time a terrorist
> burns down a building. If you ask me the only difference is, one used
> gas cans, one used jets to start the fire.

That's an obscene equivalence. Not that I have any admiration for the
lynx-lovers at all, but the difference is that one group burned down a
large wooden structure, while the other murdered 3,000 people, and
sought to murder ten times that many. Come on.

The joke is on the lynx people, since Vail rebuilt the thing anyway.
I've been in it since; its just impressive as hell. I can't think of
any wooden building I've been in that was larger. And the food was
great ;).

Dave

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.16113c657db3310e0f914c53ab6e6eab@1057 686342.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/8/03 10:45 AM:

> sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>
>> You really are insane, aren't you?
>
> Sure, why not? Have to be, considering I'm wasting time on you.
> Love your retorts, bob (actually I don't - you are getting
> soooooooooo boring). One thing I don't understand is how you
> equate "**** face" with a threat on your life. bob, in all
> seriousness, if you think for one second I would EVER take a
> chance on going to jail over the likes of a oxygen waste dump like
> you - YOU HAVE TO BE OUT OF YOUR EVER-LOVING MIND! Do
> you understand? O..U..T O..F Y..O..U..R M..I..N..D!
>
>
You really are insane, aren't you?

[scottabe]

in article , Dave Stallard at
wrote on 7/7/03 12:56 PM:

> scottabe wrote:
>>
>> Damn, I wish time could heal the thousands of dollars these sick ****s cost
>> me, the unfairly besmirched reputation in the skiing business,
>
> "Unfairly besmirched reputation" is one of my favorite Abrahamian stock
> phrases.
>

No surprise a defaming pathological liar loves it when I complain about his
vile lies.

> Exactly what "reputation" did you think you had in the skiing business,
> Schattie?

One as a funny, perceptive, witty observer of the ski scene, asshole-not the
filth you smeared me with, ****tie.

[Richard Henry]

scottabe > wrote in message
...
> in article , Dave Stallard at
> wrote on 7/7/03 12:56 PM:
>
> > scottabe wrote:
> >>
> >> Damn, I wish time could heal the thousands of dollars these sick ****s
cost
> >> me, the unfairly besmirched reputation in the skiing business,
> >
> > "Unfairly besmirched reputation" is one of my favorite Abrahamian stock
> > phrases.
> >
>
> No surprise a defaming pathological liar loves it when I complain about
his
> vile lies.
>
> > Exactly what "reputation" did you think you had in the skiing business,
> > Schattie?
>
> One as a funny, perceptive, witty observer of the ski scene, asshole-not
the
> filth you smeared me with, ****tie.
>

The stories about shagging sheep stuck in snow fences - which were those:
witty? perceptive?

They weren't funny.

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.5f476ed2a310dc42bccae15f0b3614a6@1057 842882.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/10/03 6:14 AM:

> sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>
>>>> One as a funny, perceptive, witty observer of the ski scene,
> asshole-not
>>> the
>>>> filth you smeared me with, ****tie.
>>>>
> And your behavior had nothing to do with it, right, **** face. Let's
> ask Petrick about that. Seth Masia ?

My behavior most certainly had something to do with it. I don't like liars,
and I don't like amoral assholes like Seth Masia and Tim Petrick: when you
sick ****s smeared me with your filth, they didn't have the balls to stand
up to your insanity. Why? Because they know you'd do the same thing to
them, and they don't have the balls.
>
>
>> They were VERY funny.
> Only if they were drunk AND posting on RSA. In public and in
> person, they were crude inappropriate and just plain nasty.

Really? Did you ever meet me, asshole?
We
> could ask the employees at Black Diamond how they felt about
> your exhibition. You're just a low class turd. (And this doesn't even
> include the sausage in the pants routine) . You're such a pig.

Hey, asshole? Never happened. Another sick lie from Andrew McLean, who
committed perjury and made false police reports.
Tell ya what, coward. Let's meet in person. Spew your filth to my face.
I'll bet you have a different opinion after that.
>
>
>
>> I've got a far better sense of humor than you will ever have.
> Only in your drug/alcohol addled mind.

You are insane. Get help.
>
> I'm a far
>> better man than you will ever be.
> See above

You are insane. Get help.
>
> And we both know it.
>> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>> You are the sheep with its head stuck in the fence, dumb****.
>
> Yeah, right Trunkie
>

You are insane. Get help.

[Dave Stallard]

scottabe wrote:

> > Exactly what "reputation" did you think you had in the skiing business,
> > Schattie?
>
> One as a funny, perceptive, witty observer of the ski scene, asshole-not the
> filth you smeared me with, ****tie.

"Funny, perceptive, witty" - it's hilarious how you award yourself these
accolades. Has anybody besides yourself ever called you these things? I
don't think so. My dear Schattie, in order to be "witty", you first
have to be clever, and you aren't clever. People like Vern93, Erik
Leonard, and Taku Moero are witty. You are not. As for "perceptive",
well, the only things you perceive are the things inside your head.
It's true you are very good at projecting these things onto others, but
that doesn't make you "perceptive".

One of the attributes you claim for yourself IS true, however, and that
attribute is "funny". I think it's fair to say that even to this day
large numbers of people think you are funny, and derive a great deal of
amusement from your behavior. It may not always be for reasons that you
intend, but nonetheless they do find you funny. I guess one out of
three isn't too bad.

Besides "funny", I think we name a few other attributes of your
reputation in the skiing business (such as it is) which have remained
constant. These are "wannabe", "hanger-on", and "moocher". To which
one would nowadays add "unstable", and "best avoided". So perhaps
"witty" and "perceptive" aren't that much of a loss after all.

Rage on, Schattie.

Dave

[scottabe]

in article , Dave Stallard at
wrote on 7/10/03 10:33 AM:

> scottabe wrote:
>
>>> Exactly what "reputation" did you think you had in the skiing business,
>>> Schattie?
>>
>> One as a funny, perceptive, witty observer of the ski scene, asshole-not the
>> filth you smeared me with, ****tie.
>
> "Funny, perceptive, witty" - it's hilarious how you award yourself these
> accolades.

Funny. Perceptive. Witty. Not my opinion, that of long time readers of
rsa. Readers who think you are psychopathic. Vile. Despicable.

>Has anybody besides yourself ever called you these things?

Hundreds of people. Has anyone besides me ever called you an asshole? I
think so. Hundreds of people, I'll bet.

> I
> don't think so. My dear Schattie, in order to be "witty", you first
> have to be clever, and you aren't clever. People like Vern93, Erik
> Leonard, and Taku Moero are witty.

No surprise that you think pathological liars, sociopathic stalkers, and
criminals are witty. Depends on your sense of humor. Decent people don't
find false allegations of molesting children witty. You do.

> You are not. As for "perceptive",
> well, the only things you perceive are the things inside your head.
> It's true you are very good at projecting these things onto others, but
> that doesn't make you "perceptive".

I perceive you are a psychopathic asshole, a pathological liar, and a
****head.
>
> One of the attributes you claim for yourself IS true, however, and that
> attribute is "funny". I think it's fair to say that even to this day
> large numbers of people think you are funny, and derive a great deal of
> amusement from your behavior. It may not always be for reasons that you
> intend, but nonetheless they do find you funny. I guess one out of
> three isn't too bad.
>
Large numbers of psychopaths, amoral assholes, and wack jobs like you think
I am funny and derive great amusement from smearing me with attacks. People
like you.

> Besides "funny", I think we name a few other attributes of your
> reputation in the skiing business (such as it is) which have remained
> constant. These are "wannabe", "hanger-on", and "moocher".

Wrong again, asshole. Those "attributes" are gross lies you and your sick
friends continue to defame me with.

To which
> one would nowadays add "unstable", and "best avoided". So perhaps
> "witty" and "perceptive" aren't that much of a loss after all.

As I was saying about gross lies you continue to defame me with, asshole?
>
> Rage on, Schattie.

Stalk on, psychopath. You really are deranged. Truly delusional. Get
****ed.

[scottabe]

in article
cGhhdHBoaWw=.def78cc4fc2e33805d85208d5ce3ddb1@1057 864967.cotse.net,
CurtisLemay at wrote on 7/10/03 12:22 PM:

> sponge bob dirty pants wrote:
>
> .
>>
>> Really? Did you ever meet me, asshole?
> In person, fortunately not but from discussions I've had with others,
> they think you're crude rude and a general asshole.
>
>
>
>> Tell ya what, coward. Let's meet in person. Spew your filth to my
> face.
>> I'll bet you have a different opinion after that.
>>>
> I wouldn't bet your next welfare check on it.
>
>
Not only insane, but a coward.

[The Real Bev]

"Tommy T." wrote:
>
> Boy, I hope it snows soon so some of you can get back outside.

Hey, WE'RE not the ones digging up old bones!

--
Cheers,
Bev
*******************************************
My computer doesn't have to be friendly;
civil is entirely sufficient.

[Sue]

In message >, The Real Bev
> writes
>"Tommy T." wrote:
>>
>> Boy, I hope it snows soon so some of you can get back outside.
>
>Hey, WE'RE not the ones digging up old bones!
>

He must've just come into town from rec.backcountry

The whorehouse is over there, OK?
Don't get upwind of us, and we'll see you again in a year or two.

--
Sue ];(:)