Amazing ski tip

[Fart2Fart]

I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski
*completely*. It's a technique that is so *simple*, yet so *subtle*,
that hardly *anyone* knows about it. I bet not one person in a
thousand knows anything about it. And yet once you learn it, it's
something you can use every day, because it's something that *everyone*
does all the time, *naturally*.

Does anybody have any idea what is?

It's passing gas.

Yes, passing gas is the key to revolutionizing your skiing. You see,
the extra propulsion you get from breaking wind is *critical* to getting
your skis properly edged, and even more importantly, to *crossover*,
which as we all know, is the *most* important thing in skiing. Farting
might seem like a trivial, even neglible amount of force, but done
right, it has *enormous* effects. The key is to fart in the *middle*
of the turn, where all the action of the turn *really* happens. But not
just any farting. You have to imagine yourself turning around an
imaginary point down the hill, and fart in *that* direction. If you do
it right, that tiny bit of extra force halps put your skis on edge,
*and* launches your body *across* the skis to start the next turn.

Trust me folks, it works.

F2F

[ant]

Fart2Fart wrote:

> Trust me folks, it works.

Gold. 18 carat. Made my day!

ant

[VtSkier]

Fart2Fart wrote:
> I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski
(snip)
>
> Does anybody have any idea what is?
>
> It's passing gas.

Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
before I take my first run. This is not a new thing.
I've been doing for all of my 50 years of skiing. Get
with the program F2F and ask a few questions before you
embarrass yourself by claiming to have invented something
when you really haven't

(snip)

> Trust me folks, it works.

Well, of course it works, it's completely natural.

VtSkier
<Save gas, fart in a jar.>

[JQ]

"VtSkier" > wrote in message
...
> Fart2Fart wrote:
>> I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski
> (snip)
>>
>> Does anybody have any idea what is? It's passing gas.
>
> Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
> I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
> before I take my first run. This is not a new thing.
> I've been doing for all of my 50 years of skiing. Get
> with the program F2F and ask a few questions before you
> embarrass yourself by claiming to have invented something
> when you really haven't
>
> (snip)
>
>> Trust me folks, it works.
>
> Well, of course it works, it's completely natural.
>
> VtSkier
> <Save gas, fart in a jar.>


Yes, it works and it seems to also work for those that are next to you when
you fart. Ask my son and he will attest to it too.

JQ
Dancing on the edge

[foot2foot]

"VtSkier" > wrote in message
...
> Fart2Fart wrote:
>> I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski
> (snip)
>>
>> Does anybody have any idea what is? It's passing gas.
>
> Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
> I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
> before I take my first run. This is not a new thing.
> I've been doing for all of my 50 years of skiing. Get
> with the program F2F and ask a few questions before you
> embarrass yourself by claiming to have invented something
> when you really haven't
>
> (snip)
>
>> Trust me folks, it works.
>
> Well, of course it works, it's completely natural.
>
> VtSkier
> <Save gas, fart in a jar.>

Yes, your and JQ's replies do in fact have a softening
effect on a total crab like me. And it's good to laugh
at one's self given an opportunity, something which most
"regulars" can't and won't *even* do.

So thanks for your input(s).

I've seen this gag before here, but I can't find it. Yea, it's funny
and inncouous on it's face, but I do need to point out "fart2fart" is
the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
to the FBI. He/she has cleverly shown up again and proved my
point. Thinking of course he/she is fooling everyone, but I don't
think so.

Not exactly Mr. Innocent after all, is she/he? Many of the posts
out of nulluser.com *have not* been any kind of innoucuous.
I think this very same person could well be responsible for the
extremely malicious, actually rather sick stuff that has come out
of nulluser.

Truly deranged stuff, really. When a pure nut like that sets in
after me, I think it's time to do something about it.

I don't buy the "I don't know you dude" crap either. It's the
same poster. Look at the style of the first post I reported.
Look at the style of the joke post.

Please. It's the same person. Someone that isn't hitting on
all eight cylinders. The regulars and holders of the "group
agenda" will try to convince otherwise, but I doubt that
there are many people in the world of readers that
believe they aren't the same person. Of course they are.

What kind of person would feel a need to do this? Hire out
an anonymizer and post pure slime (as they've done in the past)?
Who needs to play this kind of game? Someone with a
problem, that's who.

The other intersting side of this is that, as I look back, (I have her
killfiled) I see that when nulluser posts, Anthea Kerrison
immediately answers, nulluser posts again, Kerrison immediately
answers. Golly.

I wonder what that could mean? I also notice she's *still*
been hanging on my posts, and once when I said I considered
the subject of nulluser closed, she posted up "no it isn't".
Then there's something about snake oil salesman.

She can't seem to let go.

In fact, nulluser never posted to me that I can recall, until I
finally cut Anthea Kerrison out of my usenet life, and said so.

Who can wonder why I want nothing to do with
Anthea Kerrison?

One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
anonymizer.

[VtSkier]

foot2foot wrote:
> "VtSkier" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Fart2Fart wrote:
>>
>>>I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>>Does anybody have any idea what is? It's passing gas.
>>
>>Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
>>I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
>>before I take my first run. This is not a new thing.
>>I've been doing for all of my 50 years of skiing. Get
>>with the program F2F and ask a few questions before you
>>embarrass yourself by claiming to have invented something
>>when you really haven't
>>
>>(snip)
>>
>>
>>>Trust me folks, it works.
>>
>>Well, of course it works, it's completely natural.
>>
>>VtSkier
>><Save gas, fart in a jar.>
>
>
> Yes, your and JQ's replies do in fact have a softening
> effect on a total crab like me. And it's good to laugh
> at one's self given an opportunity, something which most
> "regulars" can't and won't *even* do.

It was certainly my intention to give you a chuckle. I
WAS also laughing at myself. You know, the guy who's
been doing it for so long that everything is old hat?

> So thanks for your input(s).
>
(snippage of stuff that's been talked about before. I
still don't think there is much malevolence to this Phlubarb
character except that he/she posts through an anonymous
remailer. I did a quick google on the name and found a few
recent posts and back about 2000, 2001, a number of folks
here having fun with the word, along with the word Phester.
No posts from Phlubarb. I would suspect that P is someone
who has been here in the past, got burnt by the previous
goings-on, left for a while and came back using a handle
which he/she thought was cute and an anonymous remailer.

Again, people who use anonymous remailers here on rsa
were not all that rare in the past. I really don't think
it's a particular issue.)

[Sue White]

In message >, foot2foot
> writes

>the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
>to the FBI. He/she has cleverly shown up again and proved my

Is that the same as making a federal case out of it?

>
>Truly deranged stuff, really. When a pure nut like that sets in
>after me, I think it's time to do something about it.

The more you take them seriously the more they'll swarm round you.
That's why they like Scott.

>I don't buy the "I don't know you dude" crap either. It's the
>same poster. Look at the style of the first post I reported.
>Look at the style of the joke post.

Well, I don't know you, I'm several thousand miles away, and I think
you're overreacting.
>
>Please. It's the same person. Someone that isn't hitting on
>all eight cylinders. The regulars and holders of the "group
>agenda" will try to convince otherwise, but I doubt that
>there are many people in the world of readers that
>believe they aren't the same person. Of course they are.

Quite likely. Scott's fan club used to put quite a lot of effort into
exaggerating their numbers. So what if they are?
>
>What kind of person would feel a need to do this? Hire out
>an anonymizer and post pure slime (as they've done in the past)?
>Who needs to play this kind of game? Someone with a
>problem, that's who.
>
Certainly. But they're looking for someone else with a problem.
You needn't go along with the game if you don't want to.

>The other intersting side of this is that, as I look back, (I have her
>killfiled) I see that when nulluser posts, Anthea Kerrison
>immediately answers, nulluser posts again, Kerrison immediately
>answers. Golly.
>
Wow! Fancy that! It could mean they're within a few hours of the same
time zone! Or that one of them's posting from work - hasn't anyone in
Leftpondia got an actual job to do?

>I wonder what that could mean? I also notice she's *still*
>
>She can't seem to let go.
>
>finally cut Anthea Kerrison out of my usenet life, and said so.
>
>Who can wonder why I want nothing to do with
>Anthea Kerrison?
>
She knows what you're talking about, and she doesn't agree with you.
Maybe you'd be more comfortable posting at length to an inert audience,
but if you want to do that you should do it from a website.
Usenet mainly does discussion, even acrimonious discussion.

>One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
>not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
>anonymizer.
>

Nor do I. But that's a matter of individual choice.

--
Sue ]3(:)

At the last annual count, Britain had 544 breweries and rising.

[foot2foot]

"Sue White" > wrote in message

(some snips)

>
> Is that the same as making a federal case out of it?

It's a federal crime to harass IRL.

>
>>
>>Truly deranged stuff, really. When a pure nut like that sets in
>>after me, I think it's time to do something about it.
>
> The more you take them seriously the more they'll swarm round you. That's
> why they like Scott.

That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.

I'm beginning to wonder more and more about this "anonymous
nuts" thing in here. Perhaps it's time to think about which known
posters in here are behind some of this utter slime being posted.

>>What kind of person would feel a need to do this? Hire out
>>an anonymizer and post pure slime (as they've done in the past)?
>>Who needs to play this kind of game? Someone with a
>>problem, that's who.
>>
> Certainly. But they're looking for someone else with a problem.
> You needn't go along with the game if you don't want to.

They need to go to jail or suffer civil penalty if they play it in real
life, or even go beyond a certain threshold on usenet.

> Wow! Fancy that! It could mean they're within a few hours of the same
> time zone! Or that one of them's posting from work - hasn't anyone in
> Leftpondia got an actual job to do?

Please. The relation between this nulluser poster and Kerrison
seems a bit intimate.

> She knows what you're talking about, and she doesn't agree with you.

Please. She's fixated, she's stalking me and she can't give it
up. It's malicious behavior. "Incompetent snake oil salesman
with verbal diarrhea?" Yea, there's some calm discussion.
She's a malicious individual and that's her intent.

> Maybe you'd be more comfortable posting at length to an inert audience,
> but if you want to do that you should do it from a website.
> Usenet mainly does discussion, even acrimonious discussion.

I'd be more comfortable not being stalked by Anthea Kerrison
who has fixated on me.

>>One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
>>not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
>>anonymizer.
>>
>
> Nor do I. But that's a matter of individual choice.

Sue, it's a matter of not being a really poor example of a human
being. Basically, not being a nut with serious mental problems
of one kind or the other. Anyone who looked at some of those
posts out of nulluser can tell that. Really, anyone who looks at
both these posts out of nulluser as a unit can see someone with
a problem as well. Then throw in the absurd "dude I don't know
who you are and life is too short" nonsense, and my point is made
by the very person opposing it, this "harmless, innocuous" original
poster.

Let's face it, funny or what, the "fart2fart" post out of nulluser was
surely from the same poster that posted the first one. The second
post was an attack, a really juvenile one consisting of third grade
bathroom humor that other posters tried to save because of their
own good intentions. So the first one *wasn't* an attack? However
mildly put? This from an anonymous poster who is *afraid* to put
their own name to the crap they wrote. Not much of a person, are
they? Let's hire out an anonymizer and post against people as we
operate on the intellectual and emotional level of a third grader.

[pigo]

"foot2foot" > wrote in message
...

(mercy snip)

nice try bert.

[ant]

VtSkier wrote:
> Fart2Fart wrote:
>> I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski (snip)
>>
>> Does anybody have any idea what is?
>>
>> It's passing gas.
>
> Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
> I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
> before I take my first run.

Anti-social skiier: someone on twin tips on a powder morning, with a
bellyfull of ski area chili (of doubtful provenance and various vintages).
Ye gods!

ant

[Fart2Fart]

foot2foot wrote:

> I've seen this gag before here, but I can't find it. Yea, it's funny
> and inncouous on it's face, but I do need to point out "fart2fart" is
> the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
> to the FBI.

No I'm not, you stupid twit.

> Truly deranged stuff, really. When a pure nut like that sets in
> after me, I think it's time to do something about it.

"Truly deranged stuff"? Gee, that sounds just like Schattie. Are you
****ing him? That's going to make Bert jealous.

> I don't buy the "I don't know you dude" crap either. It's the
> same poster. Look at the style of the first post I reported.
> Look at the style of the joke post.

Any stylistic similarities are a product of your own imagination. I'm
not sure you could see a style if it bit you on the ass.

> Please. It's the same person. Someone that isn't hitting on
> all eight cylinders.

That sounds like a perfect description of you, wonderboy.

> The regulars and holders of the "group
> agenda" will try to convince otherwise, but I doubt that
> there are many people in the world of readers that
> believe they aren't the same person. Of course they are.

You're an anon yourelf, ****wit.

> One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
> not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
> anonymizer.

So what *is* your name, asshole? I guess "Asshole" will have to do.

Uh-oh, now you're going to report this post to the FBI. Go ahead. I'm
sure they have plenty of time to listen to the paranoid complaints of an
hysterical, insecure mama's boy.

F

[ant]

foot2foot wrote:

> I've seen this gag before here, but I can't find it. Yea, it's funny
> and inncouous on it's face, but I do need to point out "fart2fart" is
> the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
> to the FBI.

Pleasepleaseplease Foot, tell us that you've sent the fart2fart post to the
FBI! Pleeeeeeeeze.

> The other intersting side of this is that, as I look back, (I have her
> killfiled) I see that when nulluser posts, Anthea Kerrison
> immediately answers, nulluser posts again, Kerrison immediately
> answers. Golly.

What?! You're reading my posts? I thought you'd sent me to Coventry.

btw, why are you using my full name, while claiming that I and others are
stalking you? Don't you realise that if law enforcement did look at this,
the conclusion they'd draw is the opposite? Such an action can actually be
claimed as harassment, something you are complaining others are doing to
you. Your case won't work, Foot, if you are seen to be doing things that you
are complaining about.

> She can't seem to let go.

I think you are wonderful, Foot.

> One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
> not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
> anonymizer.

You don't have a name. No one knows who you are.
OTOH, you are posting my full name in your posts. Now, if I was to complain
to law enforcement, who do you think would have a case?

I'll say this about you: you really aren't very bright.

ant

[ant]

foot2foot wrote:

> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.

More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name repeatedly
in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure Bert.

ant

[VtSkier]

ant wrote:
> VtSkier wrote:
>
>>Fart2Fart wrote:
>>
>>>I have am *amazing* ski tip that will change the way you ski (snip)
>>>
>>>Does anybody have any idea what is?
>>>
>>>It's passing gas.
>>
>>Of course. I do that all the time. In fact that's why
>>I have a HUGE bowl of SkiAreaChili(tm) every morning
>>before I take my first run.
>
> Anti-social skiier: someone on twin tips on a powder morning, with a
> bellyfull of ski area chili (of doubtful provenance and various vintages).
> Ye gods!
>
> ant

Well, at least there is NOBODY poaching my line.

[Richard Henry]

"foot2foot" > wrote in message
...
>
> Let's face it, funny or what, the "fart2fart" post out of nulluser was
> surely from the same poster that posted the first one. The second
> post was an attack, a really juvenile one consisting of third grade
> bathroom humor that other posters tried to save because of their
> own good intentions. So the first one *wasn't* an attack? However
> mildly put? This from an anonymous poster who is *afraid* to put
> their own name to the crap they wrote. Not much of a person, are
> they? Let's hire out an anonymizer and post against people as we
> operate on the intellectual and emotional level of a third grader.

I thought Scott was still on your side.

[The Real Bev]

ant wrote:
>
> foot2foot wrote:
>
> > That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
> > Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>
> More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name repeatedly
> in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure Bert.

Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're right. The
hysteria is starting to leak through...

--
Cheers,
Bev
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The Marketing Professional's Motto: "We don't screw the customers. All
we're doing is holding them down while the salespeople screw them."
-- Scott Adams

[ant]

VtSkier wrote:
> ant wrote:

>> Anti-social skiier: someone on twin tips on a powder morning, with a
>> bellyfull of ski area chili (of doubtful provenance and various
>> vintages). Ye gods!

> Well, at least there is NOBODY poaching my line.

On the contrary, they'd all be scrambling to get in front, as the
combination of rooster tails and horrible farts would craze them into
action.

ant

[CParker]

"foot2foot" > wrote in message
...

Snipped

> Let's face it, funny or what, the "fart2fart" post out of nulluser was
> surely from the same poster that posted the first one. The second
> post was an attack, a really juvenile one consisting of third grade
> bathroom humor that other posters tried to save because of their
> own good intentions. So the first one *wasn't* an attack? However
> mildly put? This from an anonymous poster who is *afraid* to put
> their own name to the crap they wrote. Not much of a person, are
> they? Let's hire out an anonymizer and post against people as we
> operate on the intellectual and emotional level of a third grader.
>

Hey, Foot, I haven't seen you putting your name on any of your posts.
How about it, put up or shut up!
My name is on all of my posts, and I don't have any problem telling you that
you are acting like a paranoid idiot.

C.

[ant]

The Real Bev wrote:
> ant wrote:
>>
>> foot2foot wrote:
>>
>>> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>
>> More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name
>> repeatedly in posts, while screeching about harassment and
>> stalking.... Pure Bert.
>
> Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're
> right. The hysteria is starting to leak through...

Use of asterisks and inverted commas as well, and the way he yells about
people doing stuff to him, while he's actually doing that stuff... It's very
Bertish. And it was me and Dave S wondering if he was Bert that got him
going in the first place.

Well, at least now we have a name to put in OUR posts!

ant

[ant]

tm wrote:
> "foot2foot" > wrote:
>
>> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>
> She once responded to one of my posts and i reported her to the Senate
> Governmental Affairs Redirection Page.
> <http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/psi.htm>
> It seemed to help.

[Jumps around, waves hands in air, sticks out tongue]

It didn't work!

ant

[foot2foot]

"Fart2Fart" > wrote in message


>> I've seen this gag before here, but I can't find it. Yea, it's funny
>> and inncouous on it's face, but I do need to point out "fart2fart" is
>> the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
>> to the FBI.
>
> No I'm not, you stupid twit.

Yes you are.

>> Truly deranged stuff, really. When a pure nut like that sets in
>> after me, I think it's time to do something about it.
>
> "Truly deranged stuff"? Gee, that sounds just like Schattie. Are you
> ****ing him? That's going to make Bert jealous.

Please. This *isn't* Anthea, or one of her brood? Sure sounds
like Anthea to me, all this "Bert" crap in several posts, some
from "ant" and some from this peabrain. This person is one
filthy item. I'm not really even comfortable quoting this, but
I went ahead. It's in print somewhere anyway.

Sweetie, I'm not Bert. *You* are an extremely
disturbed individual.

>> I don't buy the "I don't know you dude" crap either. It's the
>> same poster. Look at the style of the first post I reported.
>> Look at the style of the joke post.
>
> Any stylistic similarities are a product of your own imagination. I'm
> not sure you could see a style if it bit you on the ass.

Aw, GEE, that sounds familiar.

>> Please. It's the same person. Someone that isn't hitting on
>> all eight cylinders.
>
> That sounds like a perfect description of you, wonderboy.

Well, the wonderboy doesn't seem to fit as well...

>> The regulars and holders of the "group
>> agenda" will try to convince otherwise, but I doubt that
>> there are many people in the world of readers that
>> believe they aren't the same person. Of course they are.
>
> You're an anon yourelf, ****wit.
>
>> One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
>> not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
>> anonymizer.
>
> So what *is* your name, asshole? I guess "Asshole" will have to do.

A Scott imitation. Uh oh. You, this filthy, malevelent creature is
calling *me* such a name?

> Uh-oh, now you're going to report this post to the FBI. Go ahead. I'm
> sure they have plenty of time to listen to the paranoid complaints of an
> hysterical, insecure mama's boy.
>
> F

There are apparently already people in here who know who I am.

I'm about done with "fart2fart", but since we're all guessing
each other's names, doesn't this *really* sound like
Anthea Kerrisson?

You've got the "twit", you've got the "****wit", you've got the
"insecure momma's boy" and the "paranoid" (of course that is
getting pretty common terminology lately).

You know what, deranged idiot that posts through nulluser
dot com and is indeed *a pure coward*, besides a filty, useless
malicious nut case?

You *have* been reported, you *are* being watched, and
you'd better not do anything in real life or your cowardly,
malicious, juvenile, basically worthless self will end up in
jail, just like you keep wishing on "schattie". Gee, where
have I heard this schattie thing before? In some of the slimiest
posts that have appeared here. Wonder who's been making
these anonymous posts? Who, from the time our "arguments"
began, has been trying to associate *me* up with the whole
"Scott" thing. Well, you know I think that's Anthea Kerrison.

Who *do* you think you're fooling?

Who else could this moron possibly be, but Anthea or one
of the cheering section? Please. My vote is Anthea herself.

None of *this* stuff started happening until I "offended"
Ms. Anthea. Is there, or is there not something extremely
wrong with this woman?

"Anonymous nuts", my toepiece. It's Kerrison, or one of
her little pals, and she knows perfectly well who if it isn't
her.

She's fixated on me, she's obsessive and she can't let it go.
How much more obvious this could be, I don't know.

[VtSkier]

ant wrote:
> VtSkier wrote:
>
>>ant wrote:
>
>
>>>Anti-social skiier: someone on twin tips on a powder morning, with a
>>>bellyfull of ski area chili (of doubtful provenance and various
>>>vintages). Ye gods!
>
>
>>Well, at least there is NOBODY poaching my line.
>
>
> On the contrary, they'd all be scrambling to get in front, as the
> combination of rooster tails and horrible farts would craze them into
> action.
>
> ant

You don't know my farts very well, do you? Staying in front
just isn't an option. Must take a whole different trail.

[VtSkier]

tm wrote:
> The Real Bev wrote:
>
>>ant wrote:
>>
>>>foot2foot wrote:
>
>
>>>>That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>>Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>
>>>More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name repeatedly
>>>in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure Bert.
>>
>>Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're right. The
>>hysteria is starting to leak through...
>
>
> It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you may
> not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
> 'VtSkier' for quite some time.

Oh man, so that was you "poaching my line" <wink,wink,nudge,nudge>

I've Alan Baker a couple of times (easy because my dad was
Canadian). I do the "go ootside" kind of thing pretty well.
I tried Alex, but even though I visited the UK last fall, I
still don't have it down right.

I haven't tried ant because I'm sure I can't get that shrillness,
and Mr Urrrk is too smooth and witty. I just can't keep up.

[ant]

tm wrote:
> The Real Bev wrote:
>> ant wrote:
>>> foot2foot wrote:
>
>>>> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>
>>> More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name
>>> repeatedly in posts, while screeching about harassment and
>>> stalking.... Pure Bert.
>>
>> Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're
>> right. The hysteria is starting to leak through...
>
> It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you may
> not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
> 'VtSkier' for quite some time.

I thought the stockings and heels were quite becoming, but I'm not sure
about that bright orange wollen hat.

ant

[ant]

tm wrote:
> ant wrote:
>> tm wrote:
>
>>> She once responded to one of my posts and i reported her to the
>>> Senate Governmental Affairs Redirection Page.
>>> <http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/psi.htm>
>>> It seemed to help.
>>
>> [Jumps around, waves hands in air, sticks out tongue]
>>
>> It didn't work!
>
> Time of response noted.

oh ****

[runs away wildly]

ant

[Mary Malmros]

tm wrote:

> The Real Bev wrote:
>
>>ant wrote:
>>
>>>foot2foot wrote:
>
>
>>>>That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>>Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>
>>>More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name repeatedly
>>>in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure Bert.
>>
>>Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're right. The
>>hysteria is starting to leak through...
>
>
> It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you may
> not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
> 'VtSkier' for quite some time.

WHAT??!?!??

And here I thought it was the beer...

--
Mary Malmros
Some days you're the windshield, other days you're the bug.

[VtSkier]

ant wrote:
> tm wrote:
>
>>The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>>>ant wrote:
>>>
>>>>foot2foot wrote:
>>
>>>>>That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>>>Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>>
>>>>More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name
>>>>repeatedly in posts, while screeching about harassment and
>>>>stalking.... Pure Bert.
>>>
>>>Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're
>>>right. The hysteria is starting to leak through...
>>
>>It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you may
>>not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
>>'VtSkier' for quite some time.
>
>
> I thought the stockings and heels were quite becoming, but I'm not sure
> about that bright orange wollen hat.

with stocking and heels? It's really quite a fashion statement.

[Lisa Horton]

ant wrote:
>
> tm wrote:
> > The Real Bev wrote:
> >> ant wrote:
> >>> foot2foot wrote:
> >
> >>>> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
> >>>> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
> >>>
> >>> More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name
> >>> repeatedly in posts, while screeching about harassment and
> >>> stalking.... Pure Bert.
> >>
> >> Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're
> >> right. The hysteria is starting to leak through...
> >
> > It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you may
> > not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
> > 'VtSkier' for quite some time.
>
> I thought the stockings and heels were quite becoming, but I'm not sure
> about that bright orange wollen hat.
>

At least the hat matched the shorts, yes? :)

Lisa

[Olaf Timandahaff]

In article >, foot2foot had this to
say about that...
[~~~]
>
> She's fixated on me, she's obsessive and she can't let it go.
> How much more obvious this could be, I don't know.
>
Can you spell "hypocirite"?

[Dick Gozinya]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:18:32 -0700, "Scott Abraham"
> wrote:

>
>"ant" > wrote in message
...
>> foot2foot wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen this gag before here, but I can't find it. Yea, it's funny
>>> and inncouous on it's face, but I do need to point out "fart2fart" is
>>> the same "phlubarb" poster out of nulluser.com that I reported
>>> to the FBI.
>>
>> Pleasepleaseplease Foot, tell us that you've sent the fart2fart post to
>> the FBI! Pleeeeeeeeze.
>
>Please do. Invite them to investigate Kerrison's history. She'll never get
>back in this country again...or if she does, she will be arrested and tried.
>>
>>> The other intersting side of this is that, as I look back, (I have her
>>> killfiled) I see that when nulluser posts, Anthea Kerrison
>>> immediately answers, nulluser posts again, Kerrison immediately
>>> answers. Golly.
>>
>> What?! You're reading my posts? I thought you'd sent me to Coventry.
>
>Typical of Kerrison to laugh at her victims.
>>
>> btw, why are you using my full name, while claiming that I and others are
>> stalking you?
>
>Because you are stalking and harassing him.
>
>> Don't you realise that if law enforcement did look at this, the conclusion
>> they'd draw is the opposite?
>
>Hardly. You really don't realize how transparent you are, do you? You got
>away with lying to the cops once. It won't happen again.
>
>> Such an action can actually be claimed as harassment, something you are
>> complaining others are doing to you. Your case won't work, Foot, if you
>> are seen to be doing things that you are complaining about.
>
>Truly amazing. She stalked me, harassed me, threatened me, then lied to the
>cops and accused me of doing that to her. She got away with it. She thinks
>she can do it again. Truly delusional.
>>
>>> She can't seem to let go.
>>
>> I think you are wonderful, Foot.
>
>I think you are a psychopath, Kerrison.
>>
>>> One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
>>> not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
>>> anonymizer.
>>
>> You don't have a name. No one knows who you are.
>> OTOH, you are posting my full name in your posts. Now, if I was to
>> complain to law enforcement, who do you think would have a case?
>
>Foot. You stupid, sick ****: you really don't realize how easy it is to
>spot you as the psychopath you are.
>>
>> I'll say this about you: you really aren't very bright.
>
>I'll say this about you: you're a psychopathic criminal.
>
What drivel. Scott you are such an ass.


"I am Homer of Borg. You will be assim...ooooohhh, donut"!

[Sue White]

In message >, VtSkier
> writes
>ant wrote:
>> VtSkier wrote:
>>
>>>ant wrote:
>>
>>>>Anti-social skiier: someone on twin tips on a powder morning, with a
>>>>bellyfull of ski area chili (of doubtful provenance and various
>>>>vintages). Ye gods!
>>
>>>Well, at least there is NOBODY poaching my line.
>> On the contrary, they'd all be scrambling to get in front, as the
>>combination of rooster tails and horrible farts would craze them into
>>action.
>> ant
>
>You don't know my farts very well, do you? Staying in front
>just isn't an option. Must take a whole different trail.


The fart that moves faster than a speeding skier is potential military
technology, especially if it kills people but leaves buildings standing.

The Conspiracy will pay you millions for the formula if you send it -
[NO CARRIER]

--
Sue ]X(:)

Set 'hypocirite' on your secret decoder ring

[Sue White]

In message >, foot2foot
> writes
>"Sue White" > wrote in message
>
>(some snips)
>
>>
>> Is that the same as making a federal case out of it?
>
>It's a federal crime to harass IRL.

What injury exactly are you alleging they've done you?
>
>That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.

Ant hasn't a history of obsessive behaviour, so that's unlikely.

>
>I'm beginning to wonder more and more about this "anonymous
>nuts" thing in here. Perhaps it's time to think about which known
>posters in here are behind some of this utter slime being posted.

You're assuming the posters who don't like you must have a stake in the
group.
There's no evidence for this, and some against it.
When they were trying to start a fight with me, one of them tried to
insult me by claiming that I couldn't actually ski (then I'd try to
defend my skiing, they'd refuse to believe me and the argument would
become open ended.) If he'd been reading RSA for even a couple of
months (or done a quick search) he'd have known that I'm an
inexperienced skier without much motivation or aptitude.
He probably had dozens of groups to insult his way round each day, but
like a replacement-window salesman, he was trying to make his standard
pitch seem personal to the target.


>They need to go to jail or suffer civil penalty if they play it in real
>life, or even go beyond a certain threshold on usenet.

Why? What tangible harm do they do?
Nobody's forced to play with them rather than killfile them, laugh them
off, leave them unanswered.

>
>> Wow! Fancy that! It could mean they're within a few hours of the same
>> time zone! Or that one of them's posting from work - hasn't anyone in
>> Leftpondia got an actual job to do?
>
>Please. The relation between this nulluser poster and Kerrison
>seems a bit intimate.

A series of ping-pong posts doesn't create a relationship. It just
means two or more people are on at the same time and either it's out of
Leftpondian hours or they're physically not far apart, so that
propagation delays aren't too long.
I've been in exchanges like that occasionally, but never with anyone I
knew socially.

>
>> She knows what you're talking about, and she doesn't agree with you.
>
>Please. She's fixated, she's stalking me and she can't give it
>up. It's malicious behavior. "Incompetent snake oil salesman
>with verbal diarrhea?"

That's a straightforward insult. She was saying you aren't a good
skiing instructor and your posts are too long, and she was putting it
colourfully for comic effect. Here, if you sued her for libel she could
claim fair comment. (NB fair comment means it's an opinion she has a
right to hold, not that she's necessarily right.)

>Yea, there's some calm discussion.
>She's a malicious individual and that's her intent.

On Usenet she doesn't seem to mind who she offends, but maybe that's a
reaction to having to be nice to tedious clients all day. When I did
customer service I was *much* more hostile on Usenet than I am now.
Malicious? Ant? I'd let her join my beginners' class.
>
>I'd be more comfortable not being stalked by Anthea Kerrison
>who has fixated on me.

Could I just mention that stalking is something you do *without* the
prey being aware of it? One moment they're browsing happily on the hill
(or in the Cafe Royal) and the next moment, BLAT, they're dead.
>
>>>One thing I will never do, is post anything that I would
>>>not mind having my name connected with. I don't need an
>>>anonymizer.
>>>
>>
>> Nor do I. But that's a matter of individual choice.
>
>Sue, it's a matter of not being a really poor example of a human
>being. Basically, not being a nut with serious mental problems

This is Usenet, we're all nuts.
The average person's 50% f*cked up (by definition) and most Usenet
posters are more f*cked up than average. You aren't aware of those who
share your own personality problems because they seem normal to you, but
remember if they seem totally weird to you, you seem totally weird to
them.
Try to be as tolerant as you can manage, it's less stressful that way.

>
>Let's face it, funny or what, the "fart2fart" post out of nulluser was
>surely from the same poster that posted the first one. The second
>post was an attack, a really juvenile one consisting of third grade

It was a crude lampoon, suggesting that someone wanted the approval of
those who find your posts irritating. You can't afford to admit you're
offended by it though, because not having a sense of humour is closely
linked with lack of general good sense, and that loses you respect.

It's not impossible for more than one person to use the same remailer,
there seem to be fashions in those. Best to keep an open mind on that
point.
Watch for people posting from free throwaway accounts, too - they're
effectively anonymous. Hotmail would be first in line for Attack of the
Killer Rabbits if I had my way.

>bathroom humor that other posters tried to save because of their
>own good intentions. So the first one *wasn't* an attack? However
>mildly put? This from an anonymous poster who is *afraid* to put
>their own name to the crap they wrote. Not much of a person, are

Well, yours haven't got your name on either, and you went apesh*t when
someone wanted to post your name.

IMO Foot isn't Bert. Bert couldn't stick to a point for an entire
paragraph, never mind the whole of a post long enough to cure insomnia.

--
Sue ]3(:)

At the last annual count, Britain had 544 breweries and rising.

[Sue White]

In message >, Mary Malmros
> writes
>tm wrote:
>
>> The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>>>ant wrote:
>>>
>>>>foot2foot wrote:
>>
>>>>>That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>>>Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>>
>>>>More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name repeatedly
>>>>in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure Bert.
>>>
>>>Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're right. The
>>>hysteria is starting to leak through...
>> It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you
>>may not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros' *and*
>>'VtSkier' for quite some time.
>
>WHAT??!?!??
>
>And here I thought it was the beer...
>

You're not Horvath! What've you done with him?

--
Sue ]3(:)

Poster in town this week: "VOTE LABOUR" with photo of grinning George II Bush...

[Mary Malmros]

Sue White wrote:
> In message >, foot2foot
> > writes
[snip]
>> I'd be more comfortable not being stalked by Anthea Kerrison
>> who has fixated on me.
>
>
> Could I just mention that stalking is something you do *without* the
> prey being aware of it? One moment they're browsing happily on the hill
> (or in the Cafe Royal) and the next moment, BLAT, they're dead.

Correction: this isn't always true, or even perhaps true in the majority
of cases. There are many, many cases of stalking where the stalker
wants to have an effect on the stalkee: you see this in disgruntled-ex
stalking, and you see it in celebrity stalking too. So your definition
is a little off.

Having said that, I should also say that stalking is a horrible crime,
and calling someone a stalker is some serious fightin' words -- like,
say, calling someone a terrorist. IOW, it's not a term to be tossed
around lightly or casually applied to any-ol'-body who disagrees with you.

--
Mary Malmros
Some days you're the windshield, other days you're the bug.

[Mary Malmros]

Sue White wrote:

> In message >, Mary Malmros
> > writes
>
>> tm wrote:
>>
>>> The Real Bev wrote:
>>>
>>>> ant wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> foot2foot wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> That's it. I'm not so sure it's the "they", I think it's more that
>>>>>> Anthea Kerrison has fixated on me and she can't give it up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> More and more, you remind me of Bert. Using someone's full name
>>>>> repeatedly
>>>>> in posts, while screeching about harassment and stalking.... Pure
>>>>> Bert.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Foot writes better than Bert, but I'm beginning to think you're
>>>> right. The
>>>> hysteria is starting to leak through...
>>>
>>> It is actually quite easy to post unknown to usenet. Many of you
>>> may not have noticed, but i have been posting as 'Mary Malmros'
>>> *and* 'VtSkier' for quite some time.
>>
>>
>> WHAT??!?!??
>>
>> And here I thought it was the beer...
>>
>
> You're not Horvath! What've you done with him?

Look in the deepfreeze...

--
Mary Malmros
Some days you're the windshield, other days you're the bug.

[Olaf Timandahaff]

>, Scott Abraham floated this notion:

>
> "Olaf Timandahaff" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> In article >, foot2foot had this to
>> say about that...
>> [~~~]
>>>
>>> She's fixated on me, she's obsessive and she can't let it go.
>>> How much more obvious this could be, I don't know.
>>>
>> Can you spell "hypocirite"?
>
> Can you spell "asshole"?

Nono, I said "hypocirite"
Spell me yams now, Sc0tchie!

[Richard Henry]

"Olaf Timandahaff" > wrote in message
. ..
> In article >, foot2foot had this to
> say about that...
> [~~~]
> >
> > She's fixated on me, she's obsessive and she can't let it go.
> > How much more obvious this could be, I don't know.
> >
> Can you spell "hypocirite"?

I thought Bert would have figured out how to delete that posting from the
archive by now, he being an internet expert and all.

But google groups still finds the original "hypocirite", from May 19, 2002.

[lal_truckee]

Sue White wrote:
>
> IMO Foot isn't Bert. Bert couldn't stick to a point for an entire
> paragraph, never mind the whole of a post long enough to cure insomnia.

!!!!!

[Richard Henry]

"Scott Abraham" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Richard Henry" > wrote in message
> news:u_jae.8373$EX4.7702@fed1read01...
> >
> > "Olaf Timandahaff" > wrote in message
> > . ..
> >> In article >, foot2foot had this to
> >> say about that...
> >> [~~~]
> >> >
> >> > She's fixated on me, she's obsessive and she can't let it go.
> >> > How much more obvious this could be, I don't know.
> >> >
> >> Can you spell "hypocirite"?
> >
> > I thought Bert would have figured out how to delete that posting from
the
> > archive by now, he being an internet expert and all.
> >
> > But google groups still finds the original "hypocirite", from May 19,
> > 2002.
>
> All the vile lies, all the false allegations of molesting children, all
the
> real life felonies committed to harass Bert, and Richard Henry complains
> about spelling. That tells a decent person all they need to know about
this
> psychopath.

It wasn't just the spelling. It was the context.

"Can you spell 'hypocirite'?"

A usenet classic.

[Dick Gozinya]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:11:21 -0700, "Scott Abraham"
> wrote:

>Thanks. Dick Gozinya and Anthea Kerrison, good buddies.
>"Dick Gozinya" > wrote in message

Scott, given a choice of friendship between you and Ant is
a no brainier.



"I am Homer of Borg. You will be assim...ooooohhh, donut"!

[Sue White]

In message >, ant
> writes
>foot2foot wrote:
>
>> She can't seem to let go.
>
>I think you are wonderful, Foot.
>
>I'll say this about you: you really aren't very bright.
>

Can this be love?

--
Sue ]3(:)

At the last annual count, Britain had 544 breweries and rising.

[Sue White]

In message >, Mary Malmros
> writes
>Sue White wrote:
>>> I'd be more comfortable not being stalked by Anthea Kerrison
>>> who has fixated on me.
>> Could I just mention that stalking is something you do *without*
>>the prey being aware of it? One moment they're browsing happily on
>>the hill (or in the Cafe Royal) and the next moment, BLAT, they're dead.
>
>Correction: this isn't always true, or even perhaps true in the
>majority of cases. There are many, many cases of stalking where the
>stalker wants to have an effect on the stalkee: you see this in
>disgruntled-ex stalking, and you see it in celebrity stalking too. So
>your definition is a little off.
>
You get your tweed coat and your ghillie and your rifle, you crawl
face-down through heath and briar, keeping downwind of your Monarch of
the Glen, you line up a shot from about two miles away, and just as
you're about to squeeze the trigger a party of walkers in red socks
startles your stag and off he goes.
So you shoot the walkers instead, naturally - that's not a crime so long
as you don't eat them.

OK, with a former partner you might want him to know you're after him,
but you still don't want him to smell you coming - you want him to know
he doesn't know whether you're physically nearby or not. Then he's
afraid even when you're in the pub playing dominoes.

But Usenet hasn't got a physical dimension; what you see is all you get.
You can call people names but you can't throw sticks and stones.
The dafter people in this group want to believe that Usenet's coming
after them, presents a physical danger to them. It isn't a realistic
belief, but they cling to it so tightly that it must be an important
security blanket for them.

Why? If their lives are too safe and boring for them they can always go
out and do something dangerous - how many of us can't afford an urban
traffic system and a bicycle?

It's clear that they can't articulate the way they feel. They borrow
each others' vocabulary and bang on about stalkers and terrorists,
seeking to exaggerate the enormity of whatever it is they can't cope
with, but all they do is water the stock of tabloid-paper words.

>Having said that, I should also say that stalking is a horrible crime,
>and calling someone a stalker is some serious fightin' words -- like,
>say, calling someone a terrorist. IOW, it's not a term to be tossed
>around lightly or casually applied to any-ol'-body who disagrees with you.
>
Too late - "terrorist" is already creeping up on "weapons of mass
destruction" for getting a giggle by just using it. And IRL "stalker"
won't get the same reaction as "Bloodsports!" or "I don't give a f*ck
about fox hunting!"
(If you want to be taken seriously, try "fundamentalist". That's got
all the right vibes: violent, irrational, cunning and malevolent.)

Why is this happening in a group for people who whenever it snows, want
to rush up the nearest hill just to slide down it again?

--
Sue ]3(:)

Skiing is silly. So there.

[Olaf Timandahaff]

>, Scott Abraham floated this notion:

>
> "Dick Gozinya" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:11:21 -0700, "Scott Abraham"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks. Dick Gozinya and Anthea Kerrison, good buddies.
>>>"Dick Gozinya" > wrote in message
>>
>> Scott, given a choice of friendship between you and Ant is
>> a no brainier.
>
> A no brainier, eh?
> From Dick Gozinya, words of truth for a change.

Yes, A no brainier, eh!

We use this colloquialism in Eastern Canada quite often, it's from the
french creeping up on us, I'm afrayed, eh?
Shurly you don't think Seattle is the Centre of the known Universe Scotch!
That's a no bRainier, eh?

<Bitez Moi> Sp0ck!

--
In >
"(akula)" > said:

"Newsgroups die when the people who made it worth the subscription leave."

[Dick Gozinya]

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:08:03 -0400, Olaf Timandahaff
> wrote:

>, Scott Abraham floated this notion:
>
>>
>> "Dick Gozinya" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:11:21 -0700, "Scott Abraham"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thanks. Dick Gozinya and Anthea Kerrison, good buddies.
>>>>"Dick Gozinya" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Scott, given a choice of friendship between you and Ant is
>>> a no brainier.
>>
>> A no brainier, eh?
>> From Dick Gozinya, words of truth for a change.
>
>Yes, A no brainier, eh!
>
>We use this colloquialism in Eastern Canada quite often, it's from the
>french creeping up on us, I'm afrayed, eh?
>Shurly you don't think Seattle is the Centre of the known Universe Scotch!
>That's a no bRainier, eh?
>
><Bitez Moi> Sp0ck!
Wasn't there a Star Trek episode entitled "Spock's Brain"?


"I am Homer of Borg. You will be assim...ooooohhh, donut"!